Amaç: Keratokonus nedeniyle uygulanan penetran keratoplasti (PK) ve derin anterior lameller keratoplasti (DALK) cerrahilerinin uzun dönem sonuçlarını karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: PK ve DALK geçiren keratokonus olgularının tıbbi kayıtları retrospektif olarak tarandı. Olguların ameliyat öncesi ve ameliyat sonrası 5. yılda elde edilen en iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinliği (EİDGK) değerleri, sferik ve silindirik refraktif hata değerleri ile sferik eşdeğerleri kaydedildi. Takip süresi boyunca gelişen greft red reaksiyonları ve komplikasyonlar incelendi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 64 olgunun 64 gözü dâhil edildi. Olgular ortalama 70,41±10,67 (60-96 arası) ay takip edildi. Olguların 33'üne PK, 31'ine DALK uygulandı. Her iki grupta da ameliyat sonrası 5. Yıl ortalama EİDGK değerleri, ameliyat öncesi değerlerden daha yüksek idi (her bir p değeri <0,001). PK uygulanan olguların ameliyat öncesi EİDGK değerleri DALK uygulanan olgulardan daha düşük iken (p=0,002); ameliyat sonrası 5. yıl 2 grubun EİDGK değerleri istatistiksel açıdan benzerdi (p=0,16). Ameliyat sonrası 5. yıl DALK uygulanan olgularda ortalama sferik refraktif hata daha yüksek iken (p=0,048); silindirik refraktif hata ve sferik eşdeğer açısından 2 grup arasında istatistiksel anlamlı fark saptanmadı (sırasıyla p1=0,10, p2=0,12). Beş yıl takip süresi sonunda PK ile %93,9, DALK ile %100 greft sağkalımı elde edildi (p=0,17). Takiplerde en sık karşılaşılan komplikasyon, PK uygulanan olgularda %33, DALK uygulanan olgularda %6,5 oranında görülen göz içi basınç (GİB) artışı idi (p=0,08). Sonuç: Keratokonuslu gözlerde PK ve DALK cerrahilerinin uzun dönem görsel sonuçları benzerdir. GİB artışı ve greft reddi PK sonrası daha sık gözlenmektedir. DALK cerrahisi komplikasyonlar açısından daha güvenli bir seçenektir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Keratokonus; kornea nakli; penetran keratoplasti
Objective: To compare the long-term outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) surgeries performed for keratoconus. Material and Methods: Medical records of keratoconus patients who underwent PK or DALK were reviewed retrospectively. The patients' best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical and cylindrical refractive error values, and spherical equivalent were recorded before surgery and in the postoperative 5th year. Graft rejection reactions and complications developed during the follow-up period were examined. Results: Sixty-four eyes of 64 patients were included in the study. The patients were followed up for an average of 70.41±10.67 (range=60-96) months. PK was applied to 33 of patients, and DALK was applied to 31. The mean BCVA values at the postoperative 5th year were higher than the preoperative values in both groups (each p-value <0.001). While preoperative BCVA values of the patients who underwent PK were lower than those who underwent DALK (p=0.002); in the postoperative 5th year, BCVA values were statistically similar in the 2 groups (p=0.16). While the mean spherical refractive error was higher in the patients who underwent DALK surgery in the 5th postoperative year (p=0.048), there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of cylindrical refractive error and spherical equivalent (p1=0.10, p2=0.12; respectively). At the end of the 5-year follow-up period, graft survival was 93.9% after PK and 100% after DALK (p=0.17). The most common complication during follow-up was increased intraocular pressure (IOP), which was 33% in patients who underwent PK and 6.5% in patients who underwent DALK (p=0.08). Conclusion: Long-term visual outcomes of PK and DALK surgeries are similar in eyes with keratoconus. Increased IOP and graft rejection are observed more frequently after PK. DALK surgery is a safer option in terms of complications.
Keywords: Keratoconus; corneal transplantation; penetrating keratoplasty
- Santodomingo-Rubido J, Carracedo G, Suzaki A, Villa-Collar C, Vincent SJ, Wolffsohn JS. Keratoconus: an updated review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2022;45(3):101559. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kennedy RH, Bourne WM, Dyer JA. A 48-year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101(3):267-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Flockerzi E, Xanthopoulou K, Goebels SC, Zemova E, Razafimino S, Hamon L, et al. Keratoconus staging by decades: a baseline ABCD classification of 1000 patients in the Homburg Keratoconus Center. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105(8):1069-75. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hwang S, Lim DH, Chung TY. Prevalence and incidence of keratoconus in South Korea: a nationwide population-based study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;192:56-64. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Singar E. Kornea ektazisine yaklaşım ve tedavi [Approach to corneal ectasia and treatment]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol. 2021;30(1):55-74. [Crossref]
- Wisse RP, Kuiper JJ, Gans R, Imhof S, Radstake TR, Van der Lelij A. Cytokine expression in keratoconus and its corneal microenvironment: a systematic review. Ocul Surf. 2015;13(4):272-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bostancı Ceran B, Kalender Ş, Özateş S, Özdamar A. Epithelial thickness profile change after corneal crosslinking: a retrospective research. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol. 2021;30(4):211-7. [Crossref]
- Şengör T, Aydın Kurna S. Update on contact lens treatment of keratoconus. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2020;50(4):234-44. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Watson SL, Ramsay A, Dart JK, Bunce C, Craig E. Comparison of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(9):1676-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Burcu A. Derin ön lameller keratoplasti. Kornea Naklinde Yenilikler. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2021. p.91-9.
- Chen Y, Hu DN, Xia Y, Yang L, Xue C, Huang Z. Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15:144. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Gadhvi KA, Romano V, Fernández-Vega Cueto L, Aiello F, Day AC, Allan BD. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus: multisurgeon results. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;201:54-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Arnalich-Montiel F, Alió Del Barrio JL, Alió JL. Corneal surgery in keratoconus: which type, which technique, which outcomes? Eye Vis (Lond). 2016;3:2. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Coombes AG, Kirwan JF, Rostron CK. Deep lamellar keratoplasty with lyophilised tissue in the management of keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85(7):788-91. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, Ishioka M, Tsubota K. Randomized clinical trial of deep lamellar keratoplasty vs penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134(2):159-65. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Funnell CL, Ball J, Noble BA. Comparative cohort study of the outcomes of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Eye (Lond). 2006;20(5):527-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ardjomand N, Hau S, McAlister JC, Bunce C, Galaretta D, Tuft SJ, et al. Quality of vision and graft thickness in deep anterior lamellar and penetrating corneal allografts. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(2):228-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kirkness CM, Ficker LA, Steele AD, Rice NS. The success of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Eye (Lond). 1990;4(Pt 5):673-88. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lim L, Pesudovs K, Coster DJ. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: visual outcome and success. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(6):1125-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Amayem AF, Anwar M. Fluid lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(1):76-9; discussion 80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Anwar M, Teichmann KD. Deep lamellar keratoplasty: surgical techniques for anterior lamellar keratoplasty with and without baring of Descemet's membrane. Cornea. 2002;21(4):374-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Henein C, Nanavaty MA. Systematic review comparing penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for management of keratoconus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017;40(1):3-14. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Song Y, Zhang J, Pan Z. Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty versus deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus. Exp Clin Transplant. 2020;18(4):417-28. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Feizi S, Javadi MA, Karimian F, Abolhosseini M, Moshtaghion SM, Naderi A, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty versus deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in children and adolescents with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;226:13-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Acar BT, Esen D, Buttanrı Bİ, Sevim ŞM. Keratokonus tedavisinde derin ön lameller keratoplasti [Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for treatment of keratoconus]. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2010;40(3):171-5. [Crossref]
- Janiszewska-Bil D, Czarnota-Nowakowska B, Krysik K, Lyssek-Boroń A, Dobrowolski D, Grabarek BO, et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes of the lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty approaches in patients with keratoconus. J Clin Med. 2021;10(11):2421. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Koçluk Y, Alyamaç Sukgen E, Burcu A. Comparison of outcomes in patients who underwent deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and those converted to penetrating keratoplasty. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2017;47(2):63-7. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Khattak A, Nakhli FR, Al-Arfaj KM, Cheema AA. Comparison of outcomes and complications of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty performed in a large group of patients with keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38(3):985-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- MacIntyre R, Chow SP, Chan E, Poon A. Long-term outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in Australian keratoconus patients. Cornea. 2014;33(1):6-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kim KH, Choi SH, Ahn K, Chung ES, Chung TY. Comparison of refractive changes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2011;55(2):93-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Javadi MA, Feizi S, Yazdani S, Mirbabaee F. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a clinical trial. Cornea. 2010;29(4):365-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cohen AW, Goins KM, Sutphin JE, Wandling GR, Wagoner MD. Penetrating keratoplasty versus deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for the treatment of keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30(6):675-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Srinivasan S, Ya-Ping J, Slomovic AR, Rootman DS. Comparison of three different techniques of corneal transplantation for keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(6):905-12.e1. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List