Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, kar sporlarındaki farklı branşların (alp disiplini, snowboard, kayaklı koşu, biathlon ve kayakla atlama) dikey sıçrama performansı ile anaerobik güç parametrelerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya toplam 40 sporcu katılmıştır ve sporcuların boy ölçümleri Charder boy ölçüm cihazı ve Tanita TBF 300 cihazı ile ölçüldü. Dikey sıçrama testi ise Optojump marka cihaz ile CMJ testi ile anaerobik güç testi ise 894 E marka cihaz ile yapılmıştır. Elde edilen verilerin istatistiksel analizi SPSS for Windows 22.0 paket programı kullanılmıştır. Ölçülen parametrelerin normallik dağılımı Skewness, Kurtosis ve Shapiro-Wilks testleriyle sınandıktan sonra verilerin normal dağılım göstermediği tespit edilmiştir. Veriler normal dağılım göstermediğinden, spor branşları arasındaki farklılıkların tespit edilmesinde Kruskal Wallis testi, post-hoc için ise tek yönlü varyans analizi (Anova) kullanılmıştır. Farklılığın kaynağının tespitinde post-hoc testlerden Tamhane testi uygulanmıştır. Bu çalışmada anlamlılık düzeyi p<0,05 olarak alınmıştır. Bulgular: Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlara göre gruplar arasında karşılaştırılma yapıldığında, zirve güç (W), relative zirve güç (W/kg), ortalama güç (W), minimum güç (W) ve relative minimum güç (W/kg) değerleri arasında herhangi bir anlamlı farklılık saptanmamıştır (p>0,05). Sıçradığı yükseklik ve ürettiği güç değerlerinde kayakla atlama sporcuları ile biathlon ve kayaklı koşu sporcuları arasında kayakla atlama sporcuları lehine, yorgunluk indeksi değerinde ise biathlon ve kayaklı koşu sporcuları ile kayaklı atlama sporcuları arasında biathlon ve kayaklı koşu sporcularının lehine anlamlı bir fark olduğu görülmektedir (p<0,05). Sonuç: Araştırma sonunda elde edilen verilere göre gruplar arasındaki farklılığın sporcuların yaptıkları branş gereği uyguladıkları antrenman metotlarından kaynaklandığı ve bu uygulanan metodun iyi olan motorik özelliğini daha iyi seviyeye getirdiği için kaynaklandığı düşünülmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Kar sporları; dikey sıçrama; wingate; anaerobik performans
Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the vertical jump performance and anaerobic power parameters of different branches in snow sports (alpine skiing, snowboarding, ski running, biathlon and ski jumping). Material and Methods: A total of 40 athletes participated in the study and the height measurements of the athletes were measured with a Charter height measuring device and a Tanita TBF 300 device. The vertical jump test was performed with the Optojump brand device with the CMJ test, and the anaerobic power test with the 894 E brand device. Statistical analysis of the obtained data was SPSS. For Windows 22.0 package program was used. After testing the normality distribution of the measured parameters with the Skewness, Kurtosis and Shapiro-Wilks tests, it was determined that the data did not show normal distribution. Since the data did not show normal distribution, Kruskal Wallis test was used to determine the differences between sports branches, and one-way analysis of variance (Anova) was used for post hoc. Tamhane test, one of the post-hoc tests, was used to determine the source of the difference. In this study, the level of significance was taken as p<0.05. Results: When comparing the groups in our study, no significant difference was found between the values of peak power (W), relative peak power (W/kg), average power (W), minimum power (W) and relative minimum power (W/kg) (p>0.05). It is seen that there is a significant difference between ski jumpers and biathlon and ski runners in favor of ski jumpers in terms of jumping height and power produced, and in favor of biathlon and ski runners between biathlon and ski runners and ski jumpers in fatigue index values (p<0.05). Conclusion: According to the data obtained at the end of the research, the difference between the groups is due to the requirements of the courses given by the athletes, the training methods they apply, and the fact that this methodology is due to the better performance of the motoric feature of this methodology.
Keywords: Snow sports; vertical jump; wingate; anaerobic performance
- Noordhof DA, Skiba PF, de Koning JJ. Determining anaerobic capacity in sporting activities. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;8(5):475-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Arslan C. Relationship between the 30-second wingate test and characteristics of isometric and explosive leg strength in young subjects. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(3):658-66. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Özkan A, Köklü Y, Ersöz G. Wingate anaerobic power test. Journal of Human Sciences. 2010;7(1):207-24. [Link]
- Vanat L. Fréquentation des domaines skiables: Bilan de la saison 2008/09-Suisse 2009. [Link]
- Brügger O, Bianchi G, Schulz D, Kisser R, Rogmans W. Snow-sport helmets: injury prevention, rate of wearers and recommendations. Berne: bfu-Swiss Council for Accident Prevention, EuroSafe Task Force Safety in Sports; 2010. [Link]
- Ozan M, Kiliç M, Çakmakçı O. Assessment of anaerobic power with arm and leg Wingate tests in athletes. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science. 2018;4(3):49-60. [Crossref]
- Zhang M, Li D, He J, Liang X, Li D, Song W, et al. Effects of velocity-based versus percentage-based resistance training on explosive neuromuscular adaptations and anaerobic power in sport-college female basketball players. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(4):623. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ma T, Tan J, Li R, Li J, Gao B. Effects of six weeks of sub-plateau cold environment training on physical functioning and athletic ability in elite parallel giant slalom snowboard athletes. PeerJ. 2023;11:e14770. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Liu H, Li Y. Effects of high-intensity interval training on the anaerobic capacity of wrestlers. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte. 2013;29. [Crossref]
- Villalon-Gasch L, Jimenez-Olmedo JM, Olaya-Cuartero J, Pueo B. Test-retest and between-device reliability of Vmaxpro IMU at hip and ankle for vertical jump measurement. Sensors (Basel). 2023;23(4):2068. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Edwards T, Weakley J, Woods CT, Breed R, Benson AC, Suchomel TJ, et al. Comparison of countermovement jump and squat jump performance between 627 state and non-state representative junior Australian football players. J Strength Cond Res. 2023;37(3):641-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tortu E, Akınoğlu B, Hasanoğlu A, Kocahan T. Kadın ve erkek sporcularda anaerobik performans ve reaktif çeviklik arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: kesitsel bir çalışma [Investigation of the relationship between anaerobic performance and reactive agility in female and male athletes: a cross-sectional study]. 2021;13(3):337-43. [Crossref]
- Sandbakk O, Ettema G, Leirdal S, Jakobsen V, Holmberg HC. Analysis of a sprint ski race and associated laboratory determinants of world-class performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(6):947-57. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Nilsson JE, Holmberg HC, Tveit P, Hallén J. Effects of 20-s and 180-s double poling interval training in cross-country skiers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;92(1-2):121-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Vesterinen V, Mikkola J, Nummela A, Hynynen E, Häkkinen K. Fatigue in a simulated cross-country skiing sprint competition. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(10):1069-77. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Budak C, Dündar ST, Mertoğlu C. Examining of some physical and physiological parameters of 10-18 years old male skiers to seasonal cycles: Examination of some physical and physiological parameters in skiers. Balneo and PRM Research Journal. 2022;13(4):522. [Crossref]
- Zhou N, Fan Y, Wang X, Wang J, Wu H. Acute enteric-coated sodium bicarbonate has negligible effect on anaerobic performance but affects metabolomics and attenuates the gastrointestinal response. Front Physiol. 2022;13:996381. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Huang X, Wang G, Zhen L, Zhao J, Gao B. Dose-response relationship between training load and anaerobic performance in female short-track speed skaters: A prospective cohort study. Physiol Behav. 2022;254:113909. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wang Z, Zhong Y, Wang S. Anthropometric, physiological, and physical profile of elite snowboarding athletes. Strength & Conditioning Journal. 2022;10-1519. [Crossref]
- Hoffman JR, Epstein S, Einbinder M, Weinstein Y. A comparison between the Wingate anaerobic power test to both vertical jump and line drill tests in basketball players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2000;14(3):261-4. [Crossref]
- Woolstenhulme MT, Bailey BK, Allsen PE. Vertical jump, anaerobic power, and shooting accuracy are not altered 6 hours after strength training in collegiate women basketball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(3):422-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Nikolaidis PT, Afonso J, Clemente-Suarez VJ, Alvarado JRP, Driss T, Knechtle B, et al. Vertical jumping tests versus wingate anaerobic test in female volleyball players: the role of age. Sports (Basel). 2016;4(1):9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Sousa S, Rodrigues WRH, Rodrigues EQ. Differences in performance between anaerobic power and vertical jump on football. Revista Brasileira de Futsal e Futebol. 2015;7(26SI):441-7. [Link]
.: Process List