Derlemede, refraktif adaptasyon sürecinden (gözlük kullanımı sonrası ilk 18 hafta) sonra planlanacak kapama süresinin ne dozda ve ne kadar süreli olması gerektiği, yayın bilgilerinin değerlendirilmesi doğrultusunda önerilerle ortaya konulmuştur. Yayınlarda ortaya konulan doz-yanıt ilişkisine dair bilgilerdeki büyük farklılıkların nedenlerini anlayabilmek amacıyla, kapama doz monitörleri kullanılarak yapılan 'Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study Cooperative Group (MOTAS), İngiltere Birleşik Krallık' ve 'Randomized Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Cooperative Group (ROTAS), İngiltere Birleşik Krallık' ve monitörizasyon kullanılmadan yapılan 'Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group Amblyopia Treatment Studies (PEDIG ATS), Amerika Birleşik Devletleri (ABD)' ambliyopi çalışmaları irdelenmiş ve karşılaştırılmıştır. Kapamanın monitörize edildiği (MOTAS, ROTAS) çalışmaları, doz-sonuç ilişkisi incelendiğinde, günde 3 ile 6 saat veya 6 ile12 saat kapama reçete edilen (objektif kapama süresi değil) çocuklarda, görme artışı sonuçlarının şaşırtıcı derecede benzer olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışmalar farklı gruplardaki görme keskinliğindeki benzer artış sonuçlarının, daha uzun süreli olarak reçete edilen dozlara uyum eksikliğinden kaynaklanmış olduğunu düşündürmektedir. Gruplar, farklı kapama dozları önerilmiş olmasına rağmen ve hatta 'monitörize edildiklerini de bilmelerine rağmen', aile/çocuğun tedaviye uyumsuzluğu nedeniyle gerçekte benzer objektif kapama dozları almıştır. Hekimler tarafından önerilecek kapama süreleri, MOTAS ve ROTAS yayınları doğrultusunda, ailelerin, monitörize edilmeyeceklerini bildikleri güncel klinik uygulamalarda, kapama sürelerini bu yayınlarda belirlenenlerden de daha az sürelerde uygulayacakları bilgisi ışığında belirlenmelidir. Ambliyopide doz-etkinlik bağlamında yapılan söz konusu çalışmalarda, sonuçların kapama tedavisi başlanmadan sadece refraktif düzeltme ile elde edilen görme artış sonuçları ile karşılaştırılarak değerlendirilmesi de söz konusu olabildiğinden, derlemenin son bölümünde sadece refraktif düzeltme ile oluşan görme artışı dönemi (refraktif adaptasyon dönemi) ayrı bir başlık altında irdelenmiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Ambliyopi; ambliyopi tedavisi; kapama; kapama tedavisi; monitörizasyon
The review provides strategies based on an evaluation of the published data regarding the dosage and duration of the patching time to be planned following the refractive adaptation period (the first 18 weeks after the use of glasses). Amblyopia studies utilizing occlusion dose monitors 'Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study Cooperative Group (MOTAS), United Kingdom' and 'Randomized Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Cooperative Group (ROTAS), United Kingdom' and non-monitoring 'Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group Amblyopia Treatment Studies (PEDIG ATS), United States of America (USA)' methods were reviewed and compared in order to ascertain the reasons for major discrepancies in dose-response information given in publications. Examining the doseoutcome relationship in monitorized occlusion studies (MOTAS, ROTAS) reveals that the results in children prescribed 3 to 6 hours or 6 to 12 hours of occlusion per day (not objective occlusion time) are surprisingly similar. These studies suggest that similar results in visual acuity improvement in different groups were due to a lack of adherence to longer duration prescribed doses. Although different occlusion doses were recommended and 'knowing being monitored', different groups actually received similar objective occlusion doses due to parent/child non-adherence to treatment. Occlusion times to be recommended by physicians should be determined in line with MOTAS and ROTAS publications, in the light of the knowledge that families will apply the occlusion times for less than the ones determined in these publications in current clinical practices, where they know that they will not be monitored. In the aforementioned studies on dose-effectiveness in amblyopia, it is also possible to compare the results to the visual increase observed with refractive correction alone prior to initiating occlusion therapy; thus, in the final section of the review, the visual increase observed with only refractive correction (refractive adaptation period) is discussed separately.
Keywords: Amblyopia; amblyopia treatment; patching; patching treatment; monitorization
- Birch EE. Amblyopia and binocular vision. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013;33:67-84. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Repka MX, Beck RW, Holmes JM, Birch EE, Chandler DL, Cotter SA, et al; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial of patching regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(5):603-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Holmes JM, Kraker RT, Beck RW, Birch EE, Cotter SA, Everett DF, et al; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial of prescribed patching regimens for treatment of severe amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(11):2075-87. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Patching regimens. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(5):1063; author reply 1064-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kushner BJ. Patching regimens for amblyopia. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(4):736-7; author reply 737. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Stewart CE, Fielder AR, Stephens DA, Moseley MJ. Design of the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS). Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(8):915-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Fielder AR, Stephens DA; MOTAS Cooperative. Refractive adaptation in amblyopia: quantification of effect and implications for practice. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(12):1552-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Stephens DA, Fielder AR. Treatment dose-response in amblyopia therapy: the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(9):3048-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Stewart CE, Stephens DA, Fielder AR, Moseley MJ; MOTAS Cooperative. Modeling dose-response in amblyopia: toward a child-specific treatment plan. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(6):2589-94. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Stewart CE, Stephens DA, Fielder AR, Moseley MJ; ROTAS Cooperative. Objectively monitored patching regimens for treatment of amblyopia: randomised trial. BMJ. 2007;335(7622):707. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Hrisos S, Clarke MP, Wright CM. The emotional impact of amblyopia treatment in preschool children: randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(8):1550-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Searle A, Norman P, Harrad R, Vedhara K. Psychosocial and clinical determinants of compliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopic children. Eye (Lond). 2002;16(2):150-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Newsham D. A randomised controlled trial of written information: the effect on parental non-concordance with occlusion therapy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(7):787-91. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Hiscox F, Strong N, Thompson JR, Minshull C, Woodruff G. Occlusion for amblyopia: a comprehensive survey of outcome. Eye (Lond). 1992;6 ( Pt 3):300-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Awan M, Proudlock FA, Gottlob I. A randomized controlled trial of unilateral strabismic and mixed amblyopia using occlusion dose monitors to record compliance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(4):1435-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Maconachie GD, Gottlob I. The challenges of amblyopia treatment. Biomed J. 2015;38(6):510-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Holmes JM, Edwards AR, Beck RW, Arnold RW, Johnson DA, Klimek DL, et al; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized pilot study of near activities versus non-near activities during patching therapy for amblyopia. J AAPOS. 2005;9(2):129-36. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Papageorgiou E, Asproudis I, Maconachie G, Tsironi EE, Gottlob I. The treatment of amblyopia: current practice and emerging trends. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(6):1061-78. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial of near versus distance activities while patching for amblyopia in children aged 3 to less than 7 years. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(11):2071-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Alotaibi AG, Fawazi SM, Alenazy BR, Abu-Amero KK. Outcomes of 3 hours part-time occlusion treatment combined with near activities among children with unilateral amblyopia. Saudi Med J. 2012;33(4):395-8. [PubMed]
- Bloch D, Wick B. Differences between strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia: research findings and impact on management. In: Rutstein Rp, ed. Amblyopia. Problems in Optometry. Vol. 3. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1991. p.276-92. ISSN: 1043-6278.
- Cotter SA; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, Edwards AR, Wallace DK, Beck RW, Arnold RW, Astle WF, Barnhardt CN, et al. Treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children with refractive correction. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(6):895-903. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Writing Committee for the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, Cotter SA, Foster NC, Holmes JM, Melia BM, Wallace DK, Repka MX, et al. Optical treatment of strabismic and combined strabismic-anisometropic amblyopia. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(1):150-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Chen PL, Chen JT, Tai MC, Fu JJ, Chang CC, Lu DW. Anisometropic amblyopia treated with spectacle correction alone: possible factors predicting success and time to start patching. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(1):54-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Fielder AR. Amblyopia therapy: an update. Strabismus. 2011;19(3):91-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Scheiman MM, Hertle RW, Beck RW, Edwards AR, Birch E, Cotter SA, et al; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Randomized trial of treatment of amblyopia in children aged 7 to 17 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(4):437-47. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wallace DK, Chandler DL, Beck RW, Arnold RW, Bacal DA, Birch EE, et al; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Treatment of bilateral refractive amblyopia in children three to less than 10 years of age. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(4):487-96. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Clarke MP, Wright CM, Hrisos S, Anderson JD, Henderson J,Richardson SR. Randomised controlled trial of treatment of unilateral visual impairment detected at preschool vision screening. BMJ. 2003;327(7426):1251. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Moseley MJ, Neufeld M, McCarry B, Charnock A, McNamara R, Rice T, et al. Remediation of refractive amblyopia by optical correction alone. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002;22(4):296-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Maconachie G, Farooq S, Bush G, Proudlock FA, Gottlob I. Effect of compliance to glasses wear on the outcome of visual acuity after refractive adaptation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(14):5609. [Link]
- Norris JH, Pilling RF, Hook J. An audit of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists strabismic amblyopia treatment protocol: a departmental review. Strabismus. 2009;17(2):78-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List