Objective: We aimed to investigate user satisfaction and associated factors in geriatrics using a walking aid. Material and Methods: The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 was used to assess the satisfaction of 269 individuals aged ≥65 years using any walking aid. The relationships between satisfaction and age, years of use, body mass index, number of falls in the last year, physical activity level and health-related quality of life were analyzed. Results: The most commonly used walking aid was cane (78.8%). Ease of use was the most satisfied feature, while adjustments was the least satisfied feature. The three most important features were safety, ease of use and weight. Walking aid satisfaction had weak negative correlations with physical activity (r=-0.246) and quality of life (r=-0.131) (p<0.05). In addition, 41.6% of the participants stated that they had fallen at least once in the last year and 70.7% of them did not use a walking aid during the fall. Conclusion: Geriatrics with lower quality of life and physical activity values tend to have higher user satisfaction with walking aids with a weak relationship. Satisfaction results may contribute to the design and selection of appropriate walking aids for this population.
Keywords: Canes; satisfaction; geriatrics; physical activity; quality of life
Amaç: Yürüme yardımcısı kullanan geriatrik bireylerde kullanıcı memnuniyeti ve ilişkili faktörleri araştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Herhangi bir yürüme yardımcısı kullanan 65 yaş ve üstü 269 bireyin memnuniyeti Quebec Yardımcı Teknoloji Kullanıcı Memnuniyeti Değerlendirme 2.0 ile değerlendirildi. Memnuniyet ile yaş, kullanım yılı, beden kİtle indeksi, son bir yıldaki düşme sayısı, fiziksel aktivite seviyesi ve sağlıkla ilgili yaşam kalitesi arasındaki ilişkiler incelendi. Bulgular: En sık kullanılan yürüme yardımcısı bastondu (%78,8). En çok memnun olunan özellik kullanım kolaylığı iken en az memnun olunan özellik ayarlama kolaylığıydı. En önemli görülen üç özellik ise sağlamlık ve güvenliği, kullanım kolaylığı ve ağırlık olarak belirlendi. Yürüme yardımcısı memnuniyeti, fiziksel aktivite (r=-0,246) ve yaşam kalitesi (r=-0,131) değerleri ile negatif yönde zayıf ilişkiye sahipti (p<0,05). Ayrıca katılımcıların %41,6'sı son bir yılda en az bir kez düştüğünü, bunların %70,7'si düşme sırasında yürüme yardımcısı kullanmadığını belirtmiştir. Sonuç: Yaşam kalitesi ve fiziksel aktivite değerleri düşük olan geriatrik bireylerin, zayıf bir ilişki ile yürüme yardımcılarından memnuniyetleri daha yüksektir. Memnuniyet sonuçları, bu popülasyon için uygun yürüme yardımcılarının tasarımına ve seçimine katkıda bulunabilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Baston; memnuniyet; geriatrikler; fiziksel aktivite; yaşam kalitesi
- Loebl WY, Nunn JF. Staffs as walking aids in ancient Egypt and Palestine. J R Soc Med. 1997;90(8):450-4. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Suwannarat P, Thaweewannakij T, Kaewsanmung S, Mato L, Amatachaya S. Walking devices used by community-dwelling elderly: Proportion, types, and associated factors. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2015;33(1):34-41. [Crossref]
- Edwards NI, Jones DA. Ownership and use of assistive devices amongst older people in the community. Age Ageing. 1998;27(4):463-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Härdi I, Bridenbaugh SA, Gschwind YJ, Kressig RW. The effect of three different types of walking aids on spatio-temporal gait parameters in community-dwelling older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2014;26(2):221-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sakano Y, Murata S, Goda A, Nakano H. Factors influencing the use of walking aids by frail elderly people in senior day care centers. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(6):858. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Clarke PJ. The role of the built environment and assistive devices for outdoor mobility in later life. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014;69 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8-15. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Fong KNK, Chung RCK, Sze PPC, Ng CKM. Factors associated with fall risk of community-dwelling older people: a decision tree analysis. Digit Health. 2023;9:20552076231181202. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Stevens JA, Thomas K, Teh L, Greenspan AI. Unintentional fall injuries associated with walkers and canes in older adults treated in U.S. emergency departments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(8):1464-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Liu HH, Eaves J, Wang W, Womack J, Bullock P. Assessment of canes used by older adults in senior living communities. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;52(3):299-303. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Charron PM, Kirby RL, MacLeod DA. Epidemiology of walker-related injuries and deaths in the United States. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;74(3):237-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Salari N, Darvishi N, Ahmadipanah M, Shohaimi S, Mohammadi M. Global prevalence of falls in the older adults: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17(1):334. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Jung D, Shin S, Kim H. A fall prevention guideline for older adults living in long-term care facilities. Int Nurs Rev. 2014;61(4):525-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Carver J, Ganus A, Ivey JM, Plummer T, Eubank A. The impact of mobility assistive technology devices on participation for individuals with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(6):468-77. [PubMed]
- Allen SM, Foster A, Berg K. Receiving help at home: the interplay of human and technological assistance. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001;56(6):S374-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Brännström H, Bäckman M, Santamäki Fischer R. Walking on the edge: meanings of living in an ageing body and using a walker in everyday life - a phenomenological hermeneutic study. Int J Older People Nurs. 2013;8(2):116-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wressle E, Samuelsson K. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices. Scand J Occup Ther. 2004;11(3):143-50. [Crossref]
- Bertrand K, Raymond MH, Miller WC, Martin Ginis KA, Demers L. Walking Aids for enabling activity and participation: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(12):894-903. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- West BA, Bhat G, Stevens J, Bergen G. Assistive device use and mobility-related factors among adults aged ≥65 years. J Safety Res. 2015;55:147-50. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Wessels RD, De Witte LP. Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of QUEST 2.0 with users of various types of assistive devices. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(6):267-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ayvat E, Kilinç M, Kirdi N. The Turkish version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): its cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability. Turk J Med Sci. 2017;47(3):908-15. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Fişek G, Ölmez N, Memiş AK. Form-36 (KF-36)'nın Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği [Reliability and validity of the Turkish Version of Short Form-36 (SF-36)]. İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi. 1999;12(2):102-6. [Link]
- Yakut Y, Yasin Y, Yağci G, Şimşek E. Quebec Yardımcı Teknoloji Kullanıcı Memnuniyeti Değerlendirme 2.0 Anketi'nin protez ve ortez kullanan bireylerde Türkçe adaptasyonu [Turkish adaptation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 with users of prosthetics and orthotics]. JETR. 2020;7(3):284-95. [Link]
- Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technol Disabil. 2002;14(3):101-5. [Crossref]
- Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(5):1763-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Şimşek TT, Yümin ET, Sertel M, Öztürk A, Yümin M. Assistive device usage in elderly people and evaluation of mobility level. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2012;28(3):190-4. [Crossref]
- Resnik L, Allen S, Isenstadt D, Wasserman M, Iezzoni L. Perspectives on use of mobility aids in a diverse population of seniors: implications for intervention. Disabil Health J. 2009;2(2):77-85. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Moschny A, Platen P, Klaassen-Mielke R, Trampisch U, Hinrichs T. Barriers to physical activity in older adults in Germany: a cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:121. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Gülhan Güner S, Ural N. Yaşlılarda düşme: ülkemizde yapılmış tez çalışmaları kapsamında durum saptama [Fall in the elderly people: determining the status within the context of dissertations conducted in Turkey]. İKÇÜSBFD. 2017;2(3):9-15. [Link]
.: Process List