Objective: Technology-based remote communication offers unique opportunities regarding healthcare, and telenutrition provides ambulatory nutrition care equal to or even superior to in-person care. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of different methods used in the telenutrition system in weight loss targeted processes. Material and Methods: Three different intervention methods were examined: interaction group (n=34), monitoring group (n=34), and mail group (n=34). Hundred and two women clients with a body mass index between 18.5 and 25 kg/m2 were monitored for 8 weeks. Each participant conveyed the weekly weight measurements result before eating in the morning. The data were evaluated by SPSS 25.0 software, and the results were considered statistically significant for p<0.05. Results: The highest mean weight loss was observed among participants in the interaction group, and they experienced significantly higher weight loss than those in the mail group. The body mass index changes were more significant among clients in the interaction group with a mean of 2.2±0.4 kg/m2, followed by the monitoring group; 1.9±0.4 kg/m2, and the lowest change was observed in the mail group; 0.9±0.7 kg/m2. Additionally, participants in the interaction group experienced the highest body mass index decrease compared to the monitoring and mail groups (p<0.001). Conclusion: In conclusion, it should be indicated that increased interaction between client and dietitian and within clients may increase the weight loss success. More comprehensive studies evaluating telenutrition counseling with follow-ups and group interventions are required to investigate the exact effects of virtual counseling on weight loss management with a large population.
Keywords: Telemedicine; weight loss; obesity; internet-based intervention
Amaç: Teknolojiye dayalı uzaktan iletişim, sağlık hizmetleri açısından benzersiz fırsatlar sunar ve telebeslenme yüz yüze bakıma eşit, hatta ondan daha üstün bir şekilde uzaktan beslenme bakımı sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, telebeslenme sisteminde kullanılan farklı yöntemlerin ağırlık kaybına yönelik beslenme bakım süreçlerindeki etkinliğini araştırmayı amaçlamıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmada etkileşim grubu (n=34), izlem grubu (n=34) ve mail grubu (n=34) olmak üzere 3 farklı müdahale yöntemi incelenmiştir. Çalışmada, beden kitle indeksi 18,5 ile 25 kg/m2 arasında olan toplamda 102 kadın danışan 8 hafta boyunca izlenmiştir. Tüm katılımcılar, sabah yemekten önce haftalık vücut ağırlığı ölçüm sonucunu iletmiştir. Veriler SPSS 25.0 istatistik programı ile değerlendirilmiş ve sonuçlar p<0,05 için istatistiksel olarak anlamlı kabul edilmiştir. Bulgular: En yüksek ortalama ağırlık kaybı etkileşim grubundaki bireylerde gözlenmiş olup, mail grubuna kıyasla önemli ölçüde daha fazla ağırlık kaybı yaşamışlardır. Beden kitle indeksi değişiklikleri, ortalama 2,2±0,4 kg/m2 ile en fazla etkileşim grubunda olup daha sonra 1,9±0,4 kg/m2 ile izlem grubunda ve en düşük değişiklik 0,9±0,7 kg/m2 ile mail grubunda gözlenmiştir. Ayrıca izlem ve mail gruplarına göre en yüksek beden kitle indeksi düşüşünün etkileşim grubunda olduğu gözlenmiştir (p<0,001). Sonuç: Sonuç olarak danışan ile diyetisyen arasındaki ve danışanlar arası etkileşimin artması ağırlık kaybı sürecinin başarısını artırabilir. Çevrim içi danışmanlığın geniş bir popülasyonda ağırlık kaybı yönetimi üzerindeki kesin etkilerini araştırmak için izlem ve grup müdahaleleri yapılacak daha kapsamlı çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Teletıp; ağırlık kaybı; obezite; internet tabanlı müdahale
- WHO [Internet]. [Cited: December 13, 2021]. Obesity. Available from: [Link]
- Leblanc ES, O'Connor E, Whitlock EP, Patnode CD, Kapka T. Effectiveness of primary care-relevant treatments for obesity in adults: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(7):434-47. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Peregrin T. Telehealth is transforming health care: what you need to know to practice telenutrition. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019;119(11):1916-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Definition of Terms List February 2021 Table of Contents- Categories of Terms. 2021. Available from: [Link]
- Shah ND, Krupinski EA, Bernard J, Moyer MF. The evolution and utilization of telehealth in ambulatory nutrition practice. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021;36(4):739-49. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kaufman-Shriqui V, Sherf-Dagan S, Boaz M, Birk R. Virtual nutrition consultation: what can we learn from the COVID-19 pandemic? Public Health Nutr. 2021;24(5):1166-73. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Brunton C, Arensberg MB, Drawert S, Badaracco C, Everett W, McCauley SM. Perspectives of registered dietitian nutritionists on adoption of telehealth for nutrition care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(2):235. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Appel LJ, Clark JM, Yeh HC, Wang NY, Coughlin JW, Daumit G, et al. Comparative effectiveness of weight-loss interventions in clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(21):1959-68. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Bennett GG, Herring SJ, Puleo E, Stein EK, Emmons KM, Gillman MW. Web-based weight loss in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18(2):308-13. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Johnson KE, Alencar MK, Coakley KE, Swift DL, Cole NH, Mermier CM, et al. Telemedicine-based health coaching is effective for inducing weight loss and improving metabolic markers. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25(2):85-92. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Kuzmar IE, Cortés-Castell E, Rizo M. Effectiveness of telenutrition in a women's weight loss program. PeerJ. 2015;3:e748. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Wu BN, O'Sullivan AJ. Sex differences in energy metabolism need to be considered with lifestyle modifications in humans. J Nutr Metab. 2011;2011:391809. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Appel LJ, Moore TJ, Obarzanek E, Vollmer WM, Svetkey LP, Sacks FM, et al. A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. DASH Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(16):1117-24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Williams RL, Wood LG, Collins CE, Callister R. Effectiveness of weight loss interventions--is there a difference between men and women: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2015;16(2):171-86. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- van Wier MF, Ariëns GA, Dekkers JC, Hendriksen IJ, Smid T, van Mechelen W. Phone and e-mail counselling are effective for weight management in an overweight working population: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Vale MJ, Jelinek MV, Best JD, Dart AM, Grigg LE, Hare DL, et al; COACH Study Group. Coaching patients On Achieving Cardiovascular Health (COACH): a multicenter randomized trial in patients with coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(22):2775-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gabriele JM, Carpenter BD, Tate DF, Fisher EB. Directive and nondirective e-coach support for weight loss in overweight adults. Ann Behav Med. 2011;41(2):252-63. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Leahey TM, Wing RR. A randomized controlled pilot study testing three types of health coaches for obesity treatment: Professional, peer, and mentor. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21(5):928-34. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. Effects of Internet behavioral counseling on weight loss in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289(14):1833-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Eakin EG, Lawler SP, Vandelanotte C, Owen N. Telephone interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(5):419-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Foster GD, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, Makris AP, Rosenbaum DL, Brill C, et al. Weight and metabolic outcomes after 2 years on a low-carbohydrate versus low-fat diet: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(3):147-57. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Renjilian DA, Perri MG, Nezu AM, McKelvey WF, Shermer RL, Anton SD. Individual versus group therapy for obesity: effects of matching participants to their treatment preferences. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69(4):717-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Paul-Ebhohimhen V, Avenell A. A systematic review of the effectiveness of group versus individual treatments for adult obesity. Obes Facts. 2009;2(1):17-24. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Painter SL, Ahmed R, Kushner RF, Hill JO, Lindquist R, Brunning S, et al. Expert coaching in weight loss: retrospective analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(3):e92. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Middleton KR, Anton SD, Perri MG. Long-term adherence to health behavior change. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2013;7(6):395-404. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Burke SM, Carron AV, Shapcott KM. Cohesion in exercise groups: an overview. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008;1(2):107-23. [Crossref]
- Burlingame GM, McClendon DT, Alonso J. Cohesion in group therapy. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2011;48(1):34-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Nackers LM, Dubyak PJ, Lu X, Anton SD, Dutton GR, Perri MG. Group dynamics are associated with weight loss in the behavioral treatment of obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015;23(8):1563-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Taylor SS, Olsen MK, McVay MA, Grubber J, Gierisch JM, Yancy WS Jr, et al. The role of group cohesion in a group-based behavioral weight loss intervention. J Behav Med. 2019;42(1):162-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: Process List