Objective: The study investigated the individual centered benefits of intervention approaches according to the Model of Human Occupation. Material and Methods: Study carried out with the collaboration of Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Ergotherapy and the Ministry of Family and Social Policies. The study included 17 individuals with mental and spiritual problems staying at Hope House and 17 individuals staying at the Saray Rehabilitation Center (institutional). The evaluation of Activity Role Performance was made through Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool (MOHOST) and Performance Process Model. Results: The average age was obtained being 31.65±5.72 at institutional houses and it was 30.76±5.45 years in Hope Houses. A difference in the motivation for activity, activity role pattern, process skills and environmental components of the individuals living at the institution were found. There is a difference in motivation for activity, activity-role pattern, process skills, communication and interaction skills and environmental components scores of the individuals living in Hope House. Among the individuals at Hope House and the institution, when the difference between the preliminary and post test scores were analyzed, a difference in favor of the individuals living at Hope House was found. There is a difference in motivation for, activity-role pattern, communication and interaction skills and environmental components scores of the individuals living in Hope House. The results of Hope Houses were found to be higher than the institution houses. Conclusion: The impact of Ergotherapy interventions was presented for improving the community involvement of the individuals in Hope Homes.
Keywords: Model of human occupation; intervention; client-centered; hope house
Amaç: İnsan Aktivite-Rol Modeli'ne (MOHO) göre uygun müdahale yaklaşımlarının, kişi merkezli faydasını incelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışma Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Ergoterapi Bölümü ile Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı işbirliği ile yapılmıştır. Çalışmaya Umut Evlerinde kalan 17 zihinsel-ruhsal problemli birey ile Saray Rehabilitasyon Merkezinde kalan 17 zihinsel-ruhsal problemli olan birey dâhil edilmiştir. İnsan Aktivite-Rol Modeli Tarama Aracı (İARMTA) ve Performans Süreç Modeli ile Aktivite-rol performansı değerlendirmesi yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Kurum evlerinde kalanların yaş ortalaması 31,65±5,72 yıl, Umut Evlerinde ise 30.76±5.45 yıl olarak tespit edilmiştir. Kurumda yaşayan bireylerin, aktivite-rol için motivasyon, aktivite rol paterni, süreç becerileri ve çevre komponentlerinde fark bulunmuştur (p<0,01).Umut Evinde yaşayan bireylerin, aktivite-rol için motivasyon, aktivite rol paterni, iletişim ve etkileşim becerileri, süreç becerileri ve çevre komponentlerinde fark bulunmuştur. Umut Evi ile Kurum Evinde yaşayan bireyler arasında, ön ve son test fark puanları incelendiğinde; Umut Evindeki bireyler lehine bir fark bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Umut Evinde yaşayan bireylerin, aktive-rol için motivasyon, aktive rol paterni, iletişim etkileşim becerileri ve çevre kompenentlerinde fark bulunmuştur. Umut Evlerinin sonuçları Kurum Evlerine göre daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Umut Evlerinde yaşayan bireylerin toplumsal katılımlarını artırmak için Ergoterapi müdahalelerinin etkisi ortaya çıkmıştır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: İnsan aktivite rol model; müdahale; birey merkezli; umut evi
- Wahlbeck K. Public mental health: the time is ripe for translation of evidence into practice. World Psychiatry. 2015;14(1):36-42. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Bosnjak V, Rajabov T. Study for the mid-term review of the state program on deinstitutionalization and alternative care in Azerbaijan. Final Report; 2011. p.87.
- Sladyk K, Jacobs K, Rae MN. Occupational Therapy Essentials for Clinical Competence. 1st ed. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2010. p.3-10.
- McQuistion HL, Sowers WE, Ranz JM, Feldman JM. Handbook of Community Psychiatry. 1st ed. New York, London: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012. p.632. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kronenberg F, Simo Algado S, Pollard N. Occupational Therapy Withouth Borders Learning from Thespirit of Survivors. 2 nd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone Oxford; 2005. p.461.
- Thornicroft G, Mueser KT. Oxford Textbook of Community Mental Health. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. p.392. [Crossref]
- Hemmings CP, Underwood LA, Bouras N. Services in the community for adults with psychosis and intellectual disabilities: Delphi consultation of professionals? views. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009;53(7):677-84. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Brown C, Stoffel VC. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health: A Vistion for Participation. 1 st ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 2010. p.811.
- Nakamura-Thomas H, Kyougoku M. Application of occupational self assessment in community settings for older people. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2013;31(2):103-14. [Crossref ]
- Kielhofner G. Model of Human Occupation: Theory and Application. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p.565.
- Liu KP, Ng BF. Usefulness of the model of human occupation in the Hong Kong Chinese context. Occup Ther Health Care. 2008;22(23):25-36. [Crossref ] [PubMed]
- Cole F. Physical activity for its mental health benefits: conceptualising participation within the model of human occupation. Br J Occup Ther. 2010;73(12):607-15. [Crossref ]
- Turner N, Lydon C. Psychosocial programming in Ireland based on the model of human occupation: a program evaluation study. Occup Ther Health Care. 2008;22(2-3):105-14. [Crossref ] [PubMed]
- Gibson RW, D?Amico M, Jaffe L, Arbesman M. Occupational therapy interventions for recovery in the areas of community integration and normative life roles for adults with serious mental illness: a systematic review. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65(3):247-56. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Pan AW, Fan CW, Chen YL, Chen TJ, Kielhofner G, Yi Wu M, et al. Examining the validity of the model of human occupation screening tool: using classical test theory and item response theory. Br J Occup Ther. 2011;74(1):34-40. [Crossref ]
- Shinohara K, Yamada T, Kobayashi N, Forsyth K. The model of human occupationbased ıntervention for patients with stroke: a randomised trial. Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2012;22(2):60-9. [Crossref ]
- Parkinson S, Chester A, Cratchley S, Rowbottom J. Application of the model of human occupation screening tool (MOHOST assessment) in an acute psychiatric setting. Occup Ther Health Care. 2008;22(2-3):63-75. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wimpenny K, Forsyth K, Jones C, Matheson L, Colley J. İmplementation of the model of human occupation (MOHO) across a mental health occupational therapy service: communities of practice and a participatory change process. Therapy in Health Care. 2010;23(1). [Crossref]
- Harcourt BE. Reducing mass incarceration: lessons from the deinstitutionalization of mental hospitals in the 1960s. Chicago: The Law School the University of Chicago; 2011. p.36. [Crossref ]
- Dixon L, Goldman H. Forty years of progress in community mental health: the role of evidence-based practices. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2004;31(5):381-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kielhofner G, Morley M, Garnham M, Heasman D, Forsyth K, Lee SW, et al. A psychometric study of the model of human occupation screening tool (MOHOST), Occupational Therapy. 2010;20(2):63-70. [Crossref]
- Vrkljan B, Law M, Ripat J, Le Clair L, Letts L. Occupational Performance Process ModelOverview & Guide The University of Manitoba & Mc Master University CAOT Conference 2009. Ottawa: Ontario McMaster University & University of Manitoba Occupational Therapy; 2009.
- Fearing G, Clark J. Individuals in Context: A Practical Guide to Client-Centred Practice. 1st ed. Thoro Fare, NJ: Slack Incorporated; 2000. p.208.
- Garnham M, Morley M, Forsyth K, Lee SW, Taylor RR, Kielhofner G. Occupational Therapy Care Packages in Mental Health: Preparing for Payment; 2010. p.9.
- Green SB, Salkind NJ, Akey TM. Using SPSS for Windows: Analyzing and Undestanding Data. 2nd ed. Ed. Prenttice Hall, New Jersey; 2000. p.208-32.
- Kramer J, Kielhofner G, Lee SW, Aspole E, Castle L. Utility of the model of human occupation screening tool for detecting client change. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health. 2009;25(2):181-91. [Crossref ]
- Repper J, Carter T. A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. J Ment Health. 2011;20(4):392-411. [Crossref ] [PubMed]
- Ogletree BT, Bruce SM, Finch A, Fahey R, McLean L. Recommended communicationbased interventions for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Commun Disorders Q. 2011;32(3):164-75. [Crossref ]
- Mitchell R, Neish J. The use of a ward-based art group to assess the occupational participation of adult acute mental health clients. Br J Occup Ther. 2007;70(5):215-21. [Crossref]
- Forsyth K, Parkinson S, Kielhofner G, Kramer J, Summerfield ML, Duncan E. The measurement properties of the model of human occupation screening tool and implications for practice. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Theraphy. 2011;58(2):5-13.
- Notoh H, Yamada T, Kobayashi N, Ishii Y, Forsyth K. Examining the psychometric properties of the model of human occupation screening toole Japanese version. Hong Kong. Journal of Occupational Therap. 2013;23(1):26-31. [Crossref ]
- Kåhlin I, Haglund L. Psychosocial strengths and challenges related to work among persons with intellectual disabilities. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health. 2009;25:151-63. [Crossref ]
- Kielhofner G, Forsyth K. Measurement properties of a client self-report for treatment planning and documenting therapy outcomes. Scand J Occup Ther. 2001;8:131-9. [Crossref]
- Kielhofner G, Braveman B, Baron K, Fisher G, Hammel J, Littleton M. The model of human occupation: understanding the worker who is injured or disabled. Work. 1999;12(1):37-45.
- Kielhofner G. Model of Human Occupation: Theory and Application. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2002. p.576.
- Söderback I. International Handbook of Occupational Therapy Interventions. 1st ed. Dordrecht; London: Springer; 2008. p.554.
- Lee SW, Morley M, Taylor RR, Kielhofner G, Garnha M, Heasman D, et al. The development of care pathways andpackages in mental health based on the model of human. Occupation Screening Tool British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2011;74(6). [Crossref ]
- Coniglio FD, Hancock N, Ellis LA. Peer support within clubhouse: a grounded theory study. Community Ment Health J. 2012;48(2):153-60. [Crossref ] [PubMed]
- Bodde AE, Seo DC. A review of social and environmental barriers to physical activity for adults with intellectual disabilities. Disabil Health J. 2009;2(2):57-66. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Asmundsdóttir EE. Creation of new services: collaboration between mental health consumers and occupational therapists. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health. 2009;25(2):115-26. [Crossref ]
- Beart S, Hawkins D, Kroese BS, Smithson PT. Bariers to accessing leisure opportunities for people with learning disabilities. Br J Learn Dis. 2001;29(4):133-8. [Crossref ]
.: Process List