Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, idiyopatik skolyozlu (İS) bireylerin, eğri şiddeti ve gövde asimetrilerine göre sağlıkla ilgili yaşam kalitelerini (SİYK) incelemekti. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya İS'li, yaş ortalaması 14,14±4,03 yıl olan 49 birey dâhil edildi. Çalışma kapsamında bireylerin demografik bilgileri alındıktan sonra röntgen üzerinden eğri paterni ve Cobb açısı, öne eğilme testi ile de aksiyal gövde rotasyonu değerlendirildi. Skolyoz Dış Görünüş Anketi [Scoliosis Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ)] ile gövde asimetrisi, Hasta Tarafından Oluşturulan İndeks (HTOİ) ve Skolyoz Araştırma Cemiyetinin Sağlık İlişkili Yaşam Kalitesi-22 [Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22)] anketi ile SİYK değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Bireylerin torasik Cobb değeri 27,9°±11,1° lumbar Cobb değeri 24,4°±9,8° idi. Torasik gövde rotasyonları 8,59°±4,52° iken, lumbar rotasyonları 6,4°±3,06° idi. Bireylerin torasik Cobb açıları ve torasik rotasyonları ile yaşam kalitesi skorları arasında ilişki yokken (p>0,05); lumbar Cobb açıları ile SRS22 toplam skorları arasında (r=-0,333 ve p=0,044), lumbar Cobb açıları ile ebeveynlerin doldurduğu HTOİ arasında (r=-0,375 ve p=0,045) ve lumbar rotasyonları ile SRS-22 imaj skorları arasında (r=-0,348 ve p=0,019) negatif yönde, orta şiddette bir ilişki vardı. SAQ ile SRS-22 ''ağrı'' (r=-0,396 ve p=0,005), ''fonksiyon'' (r=-0,424 ve p=0,002), ''beden imajı'' (r=-0,417 ve p=0,003) alt grup skorları ve SRS-22 toplam puanı (r=-0,472 ve p=0,001) arasında orta şiddette bir ilişki varken, HTOİ arasında ilişki yoktu (p>0,05). Sonuç: Bu çalışmada, torasik bölgeye kıyasla özellikle lumbar bölgedeki eğri şiddeti, gövde asimetrisi ve şekil bozukluğu arttıkça; ağrı, fonksiyon, beden imajı ve yaşam kalitesinin olumsuz etkilendiği bulundu. Çalışmamıza göre skolyozlu bireylerin rehabilitasyonunda, tedavideki başarıyı artırmak için hem dış görünüşleri hem de beden imaj algıları planlanan tedavi hedefleri arasında yer almalıdır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Fiziksel görünüm; skolyoz; yaşam kalitesi
Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of individuals with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) according to curve severity and trunk asymmetries. Material and Methods: Forty-nine individuals with IS and mean age of 14.14±4.03 years were included in the study. Within the scope of the study, after obtaining the demographic information of the individuals, the curve pattern and Cobb angles on the x-ray, the axial trunk rotation with the forward bending test were evaluated. Body asymmetry with Scoliosis Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ), HRQoL with Patient Generated Index (PGI) and the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire was evaluated. Results: Thoracic Cobb value of the individuals was 27.9°±11.1° lumbar Cobb value was 24.4°±9.8°. Thoracic trunk rotation was 8.59°±4.52°, while lumbar rotation was 6.4°±3.06°. While there was no relationship between the thoracic Cobb angles and the thoracic rotations of the cases and their quality of life scores (p>0.05); there was a negative, moderate correlation between lumbar Cobb angles and SRS-22 total scores (r=-0.333 and p=0.044), between lumbar Cobb angles and PGI completed by parents (r=-0.375 and p=0.045) and between lumbar rotations and SRS-22 image scores (r=-0.348 and p=0.019). There was a moderate correlation between SAQ and SRS-22 ''pain'' (r=-0.396 and p=0.005), ''function'' (r=-0.424 and p=0.002), ''body image'' (r=-0.417 and p=0.003) subgroup scores and SRS-22 total score (r=-0.472 and p=0.001), but not with PGI (p>0.05). Conclusion: In this study, as the severity of the curve, trunk asymmetry and deformity increased especially in the lumbar region compared to the thoracic region; pain, function, body image and quality of life were found to be adversely affected. According to our study, in the rehabilitation of individuals with scoliosis, both their appearance and body image perception should be among the planned treatment targets in order to increase the success of the treatment.
Keywords: Physical appearance; scoliosis; quality of life
- Vasiliadis ES, Grivas TB, Kaspiris A. Historical overview of spinal deformities in ancient Greece. Scoliosis. 2009;4:6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Dayer R, Haumont T, Belaieff W, Lascombes P. Idiopathic scoliosis: etiological concepts and hypotheses. J Child Orthop. 2013;7(1):11-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Rolton D, Nnadi C, Fairbank J. Scoliosis: a review. J Paediatr Child Health. 2014;24(5):197-203. [Crossref]
- Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, Danielsson A, Morcuende JA. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet. 2008;371(9623):1527-37. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Karanki İ. İdiyopatik skolyozlu kız adölesanlarda beden algısı ve özsaygı düzeyinin yaşam kalitesi ve tedaviye gösterilen uyuma etkisi [Yüksek lisans tezi]. İstanbul: Haliç Üniversitesi; 2016. [Erişim tarihi: 25 Mayıs 2022]. Erişim linki: [Link]
- Altaf F, Gibson A, Dannawi Z, Noordeen H. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. BMJ. 2013;346:f2508. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Freidel K, Reichel D, Steiner A, Warschburger P, Petermann F, Weiss HR. Idiopathic scoliosis and quality of life. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;88:24-9. [PubMed]
- Parent S, Newton PO, Wenger DR. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: etiology, anatomy, natural history, and bracing. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:529-36. [PubMed]
- Lonstein JE. Scoliosis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;443:248-59. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Vasiliadis E, Grivas TB, Savvidou O, Triantafyllopoulos G. The influence of brace on quality of life of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;123:352-6. [PubMed]
- Fortin C, Grunstein E, Labelle H, Parent S, Ehrmann Feldman D. Trunk imbalance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J. 2016;16(6):687-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tones M, Moss N, Polly DW Jr. A review of quality of life and psychosocial issues in scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(26):3027-38. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Buchowski JM. Adult scoliosis: Etiology and classification. Semin Spine Surg. 2009;21(1):2-6. [Crossref]
- Asher MA, Burton DC. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects. Scoliosis. 2006;1(1):2. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Oğuz E, Ekinci Ş, Erşen Ö. Ergen idiopatik skolyozda radyolojik değerlendirme ve sınıflama sistemlerinin incelenmesi [Review of radiological assessment and classification systems of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis]. TOTBİD Dergisi. 2013;12(1):73-82. [Link]
- Miyanji F. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: current perspectives. Orthop Res Rev. 2014;6:17-26. [Crossref]
- Corona J, Sanders JO, Luhmann SJ, Diab M, Vitale MG. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(12):e86. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Langensiepen S, Semler O, Sobottke R, Fricke O, Franklin J, Schönau E, et al. Measuring procedures to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(11):2360-71. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Coelho DM, Bonagamba GH, Oliveira AS. Scoliometer measurements of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17(2):179-84. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yapar A. Spinal appearance questionnaire Türkçe çevirisi geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Tıpta uzmanlık tezi]. Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi; 2018. [29 Aralık 2020]. Erişim linki: [Link]
- Ruta DA, Garratt AM, Leng M, Russell IT, MacDonald LM. A new approach to the measurement of quality of life. The Patient-Generated Index. Med Care. 1994;32(11):1109-26. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Scheer JK, Keefe M, Lafage V, Kelly MP, Bess S, Burton DC, et al. Importance of patient-reported individualized goals when assessing outcomes for adult spinal deformity (ASD): initial experience with a Patient Generated Index (PGI). Spine J. 2017;17(10):1397-405. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Alanay A, Cil A, Berk H, Acaroglu RE, Yazici M, Akcali O, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(21):2464-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lonner B, Castillo A, Jain A, Sponseller P, Samdani A, Kelly M, et al. The patient generated index and decision regret in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2020;8(6):1231-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, Homel P, Merola AA, Grogan DP, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(14):1435-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Piątek E, Zawadzka D, Ostrowska B. Correlation between clinical condition of scoliosis and own body image perception among girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Physiotherapy. Q. 2018;26(3):34-8. [Link]
- Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, Manna B. Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(1):74-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Théroux J, Le May S, Hebert JJ, Labelle H. Back pain prevalence ıs associated with curve-type and severity in adolescents with ıdiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(15):E914-E9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Balagué F, Pellisé F. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and back pain. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2016;11(1):27. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Çalışkan İ. Adölesan idiyopatik skolyozlu hastalarda gövde kaslarının fonksiyonları ile yorgunluk düzeyi ve yaşam kalitesi arasındaki ilişki [Yüksek lisans tezi]. Ankara: Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2019. [10 Aralık 2020]. Erişim linki: [Link]
- Carreon LY, Sanders JO, Polly DW, Sucato DJ, Parent S, Roy-Beaudry M, et al; Spinal Deformity Study Group. Spinal appearance questionnaire: factor analysis, scoring, reliability, and validity testing. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(18):E1240-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Simony A, Carreon LY, Hansen KH, Andersen MO. Reliability and validity testing of a danish translated version of Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ) v 1.1. Spine Deform. 2016;4(2):94-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Matamalas A, Bagó J, D'Agata E, Pellisé F. Body image in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison study of psychometric properties between four patient-reported outcome instruments. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:81. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Carreon LY, Sanders JO, Diab M, Polly DW, Diamond BE, Sucato DJ. Discriminative properties of the spinal appearance questionnaire compared with the scoliosis research society-22 revised. Spine Deform. 2013;1(5):328-38. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List