Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, 2 farklı uzmanlık alanında eğitim gören diş hekimlerinin, 3. molar diş pozisyonlarının sınıflandırılması hakkındaki bilgi düzeylerini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmaya 12 ağız, diş ve çene radyolojisi (Grup 1) ile 18 ağız, diş ve cerrahisi uzmanlık alanından (Grup 2) olmak üzere toplam 30 gönüllü diş hekimi dâhil edildi. Katılımcılar, 46 soruluk anket formunu cevaplandırdı. Anket formunun 1. bölümünde bilgi soruları, 2. Bölümünde görsel sorular yer aldı. Görsel sorularda, 3. molar dişlerin Pell ve Gregory ile Winter sınıflamasına göre ait oldukları pozisyonlar soruldu. İlk aşamada görsel sorularda, sınıflamalara ait gerekli düzlem çizimleri/açı ölçümleri yoktu. İkinci aşamada aynı görüntüler üzerinde gerekli düzlem çizimleri/açı ölçümleri yapılarak karışık bir sıra ile tekrar soruldu. Anket sorularına verilen doğru cevaplar Pearson ki-kare testi ve eşleştirilmiş t-testi ile istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Alt 3. molar diş pozisyonlarının, gerekli düzlem çizimleri yapılmadan önceki ve yapıldıktan sonraki verilen doğru cevap sayısında Pell ve Gregory sınıflamasına ait ramus ilişkisine göre 2 grup arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulundu (p<0,05). Sonuç: Bu sınıflamalar en çok bilinen ve kullanılan sınıflamalar olmakla birlikte, gerekli düzlemler çizimleri ve açı ölçümleri yapılarak 3. molar diş pozisyonlarına karar verilmelidir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Üçüncü molar diş; pozisyon; radyografi
Objective: The aim of this study to evaluate the knowledge levels of dentists trained in two different specialties about the classification of third molar tooth positions. Material and Methods: Totally 30 volunteer dentists, including 12 oral and maxillofacial radiologists (Group 1), 18 oral and maxillofacial surgeon (Group 2), were included in the study. The participants were answered the 46-question survey form. Information questions were included in the first part, and visual questions in the second part of the survey form. In the visual questions, the positions of third molar teeth belonging to Pell and Gregory and Winter classification were asked. In the first stage, visual questions were asked without drawing the planes/measuring angle valid in these classifications. In the second stage, the same images were asked again in a mixed order by making the necessary plane drawings/angle measurements. The correct answers were statistically analyzed by Pearson chi-square test and paired t-test. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between two groups in the number of correct answers given before and after the required plane drawings of the lower third molar tooth positions, according to the ramus relationship of the Pell and Gregory classification (p<0.05). Conclusion: Although these classifications are the most known and used classifications, third molar tooth positions should be decided by making necessary plane drawings and angle measurements.
Keywords: Third molar teeth; classification; radiography
- Garn SM, Lewis AB, Bonne B. Third molar formation and its development course. Angle Orthod. 1962;32(4):270-9. [Link]
- Lima CJ, Silva LC, Melo MR, Santos JA, Santos TS. Evaluation of the agreement by examiners according to classifications of third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17(2):e281-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Vilela EM, Vitoi PA. Study of position and eruption of lower third molars in adolescents. RSBO. 2011;8(4):390-7. [Link]
- Ayaz H, Rehman A. Pattern of impacted mandibular third molar in patients reporting to Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Khyber College of Dentistry, Peshawar. J Khyber Coll Dent. 2012;2(2):50-3. [Link]
- Ades AG, Joondeph DR, Little RM, Chapko MK. A long-term study of the relationship of third molars to changes in the mandibular dental arch. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97(4):323-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Punjabi SK, Khoso NA, Butt AM, Channar KA. Third molarimpaction: evaluation of symptoms and pattern of impaction of mandibular third molar teeth. JLUMHS. 2013;12(1):26-9. [Link]
- Lysell L, Rohlin M. A study of indications used for removal of the mandibular third molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;17(3):161-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Laskin DM. Evaluation of the third molar problem. J Am Dent Assoc. 1971;82(4):824-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Stanley HR, Alattar M, Collett WK, Stringfellow HR Jr, Spiegel EH. Pathological sequelae of "neglected" impacted third molars. J Oral Pathol. 1988;17(3):113-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gay-Escoda C, Pi-era-Penalva M, Valmaseda-Castellon E. Cordalesincluidos. Exodonciaquirúrgica. En: Gay-Escoda C, Berini-Aytés L, eds. Tratado de Cirugia Bucal. Tomo I. Madrid: Ergon; 2004. p. 403-72. [Link]
- Kruger E, Thomson WM, Konthasinghe P. Third molar outcomes from age 18 to 26: findings from a population-based New Zealand longitudinal study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92(2):150-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chaparro-Avenda-o AV, Pérez-García S, Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Morbidity of third molar extraction in patients between 12 and 18 years of age. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2005;10(5):422-31. [PubMed]
- Fuster Torres MA, Gargallo Albiol J, Berini Aytés L, Gay Escoda C. Evaluation of the indication for surgical extraction of third molars according to the oral surgeon and the primary care dentist. Experience in the Master of Oral Surgery and Implantology at Barcelona University Dental School. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008;13(8):E499-504. [PubMed]
- Juodzbalys G, Daugela P. Mandibular third molar impaction: review of literature and a proposal of a classification. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2013;4(2):e1. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Pell GJ, Gregory BT. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified technique for removal. The Dent Digest. 1933;39(9):330-8. [Link]
- Winter GB. Impacted mandibular third molars. St Louis: American Medical BookCo.; 1926. p.241-79. [Link]
- Goyal S, Verma P, Raj SS. Radiographic evaluation of the status of third molars in sriganganagar population-a digital panoramic study. Malays J Med Sci. 2016;23(6):103-12. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Almendros-Marqués N, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Evaluation of intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement on classifying lower third molars according to the systems of Pell and Gregory and of Winter. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(5):893-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Vlijmen OJ, et al. The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(8):834-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 20Matzen LH, Christensen J, Hintze H, Schou S, Wenzel A. Influence of cone beam CT on treatment plan before surgical intervention of mandibular third molars and impact of radiographic factors on deciding on coronectomy vs surgical removal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(1):98870341. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Cortell-Ballester I, Almendros-Marqués N, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Validation of a computer-assisted system on classifying lower third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16(1):e68-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List