Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı polisaj tekniklerinin nanohibrid kompozit rezinlerin yüzey pürüzlülüğü üzerine etkisini araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Üç farklı nanohibrid kompozit rezin kullanılarak, 120 numune (4 mm derinliğinde, 8 mm çapında) hazırlanmıştır: Tokuyama Estelite® Sigma Quick (TESQ), Clearfil MajestyTM Esthetic (CME) ve HarmonizeTM. Polimerizasyonun ardından her grup için polisaj işlemi uygulanmayan 10 örnek, kontrol grubu olarak belirlenmiştir. Her bir kompozit rezin grubu için örnekler Opti1StepTM Polisher, SwissFlex® Discs, IdentoflexTM Composite Polisher+Ultradent® Diamond Polish 0,5 µm mint elmas polisaj patı olarak rastgele 3 polisaj sistemi grubuna ayrılmıştır (n=10). Örneklerin yüzey pürüzlülükleri profilometre kullanılarak ölçülmüştür. İstatistiksel analiz, tek yönlü ANOVA ve Kruskal-Wallis testleri kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Bulgular: CME ve TESQ grupları için polisaj sistemleri arasında yüzey pürüzlülükleri açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmamaktadır (p>0,05). HarmonizeTM grubu için en düşük yüzey pürüzlülük değeri, Opti1StepTM polisaj lastiği grubunda bulunmuştur (p≤0,05); kontrol, IdentoflexTM Composite Polisher+Ultradent® Diamond Polish 0,5µm mint elmas polisaj patı ve SwissFlex® disk grupları arasında yüzey pürüzlülüğü açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark yoktur. Çalışmada kullanılan kompozit rezinler, polisaj sistemlerine göre karşılaştırıldığında yüzey pürüzlülükleri açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark görülmemiştir. Sonuç: Kompozit rezinlerin polisajında uygulanan tek aşamalı sistemler ve polisaj lastiği+pat kullanımı, yüzey pürüzlülüğü açısından çok aşamalı sistemlerle benzer sonuçlar verebilir ve klinik olarak hekimler tarafından tercih edilebilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Nanohibrid kompozit; polisaj sistemleri; yüzey pürüzlülüğü
Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resins. Material and Methods: 120 samples (4 mm in deep, 8 mm in diameter) were prepared using three different nanohybrid composite resin groups: Tokuyama Estelite® Sigma Quick (TESQ), Clearfil MajestyTM Esthetic (CME) and HarmonizedTM. After polymerization 10 samples without polishing from each group were determined as control group. For each composite resin group, the samples were randomly divided into three groups: Opti1StepTM Polisher, SwissFlex® Discs, IdentoflexTM Composite Polisher+Ultradent® Diamond Polish 0,5 µm mint diamond polishing paste (n=10). The surface roughness of the samples was measured using a profilometer. Statistical analysis was performed using oneway ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: For CME and TESQ groups, there is no statistically significant difference between polishing systems in terms of surface roughness (p>0.05). The lowest surface roughness value for the HarmonizedTM group was found in the Opti1StepTM polishing tire group (p≤0.05); There is no statistically significant difference between the control, IdentoflexTM Composite Polisher (Kerr)+Ultradent® Diamond Polish 0.5µm mint diamond polishing paste and SwissFlex® disk groups in terms of surface roughness. When the composite resins used in the study are compared with polishing systems, there is no statistically significant difference in terms of surface roughness. Conclusion: The use of one-step systems and polishing rubber+paste for composite resins can give similar results with multi-step systems in terms of surface roughness and can be clinically preferred by physicians.
Keywords: Nanohybrid composite; polishing systems; surface roughness
- Antonson SA, Yazici AR, Kilinc E, Antonson DE, Hardigan PC. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent. 2011;39 Suppl 1:e9-17.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Blum IR, Lynch CD, Wilson NHF. Factors influencing repair of dental restorations with resin composite. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2014;17(6):81-7.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Daud A, Gray G, Lynch CD, Wilson NHF, Blum IR. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy. J Dent. 2018;71:25-30.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(10):1382-90.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Scheibe KG, Almeida KG, Medeiros IS, Costa JF, Alves CM. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(1):21-6.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Barakah HM, Taher NM. Effect of polishing systems on stain susceptibility and surface roughness of nanocomposite resin material. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(3):625-31.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Br Dent J. 2004;196(1):42-5; discussion 31.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Aytac F, Karaarslan ES, Agaccioglu M, Tastan E, Buldur M, Kuyucu E. Effects of novel finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness and morphology of nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016;28(4):247-61.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Biçer CÖ, Öz FD, Attar N, Korkmaz Y. [Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of esthetic composite resins]. Acta Odontol Turc. 2017;34(2):77-80.[Link]
- Zimmerli B, Lussi A, Flury S. Operator variability using different polishing methods and surface geometry of a nanohybrid composite. Oper Dent. 2011;36(1):52-9.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jefferies SR. Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: a state-of-the-art review. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51(2):379-97, ix.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mitchell CA, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. Iatrogenic tooth abrasion comparisons among composite materials and finishing techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88(3):320-8.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- O'Brien WJ. Abrasion, Polishing and Bleaching/ edited by William J. O'Brien. Dental Materials and Their Selection. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintescence Books; 2002. p.156-64.
- Kaptan A, Ünal M, Hürmüzlü F. [Bitirme ve parlatma sistemlerinin arka diş kompozitlerinin yüzey düzgünlüğüne etkisi]. SÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2010;19:9-14.
- Dayangaç GB. Kompozit Rezin Restorasyonlar. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi; 2000.
- Jefferies SR. Current technology and clinical appraoch estopolishing of dental restorations. In: Freedman GA, ed. Contemporary Esthetic Dentistry. 1st ed. Missouri: Elsevier; 2012. p.267-76.
- Jefferies SR. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 1998;42(4):613-27.[PubMed]
- Yadav RD, Raisingani D, Jindal D, Mathur R. A comparative analysis of different finishing and polishing devices on nanofilled, microfilled, and hybrid composite: a scanning electron microscopy and profilometric study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(3):201-8.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Aksoy G. The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. Oper Dent. 2008;33(1):44-50.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mei L, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC, Ren Y. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins. Dent Mater. 2011;27(8):770-8.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Rate of elution of leachable components from composite. Dent Mater. 1990;6(4):282-7.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Meniga A, Tarle Z, Ristic M, Sutalo J, Pichler G. Pulsed blue laser curing of hybrid composite resins. Biomaterials. 1997;18(20):1349-54.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kaizer MR, de Oliveira-Ogliari A, Cenci MS, Opdam NJ, Moraes RR. Do nanofill or submicron composites show improved smoothness and gloss? A systematic review of in vitro studies. Dent Mater. 2014;30(4):e41-78.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Da Costa J, Ferracane J, Paravina RD, Mazur RF, Roeder L. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(4):214-24; discussion 225-6.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Finishing/polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2004;29(3):275-9.[PubMed]
- St-Georges AJ, Bolla M, Fortin D, Muller-Bolla M, Thompson JY, Stamatiades PJ. Surface finish produced on three resin composites by new polishing systems. Oper Dent. 2005;30(5):593-7.[PubMed]
- Ereifej NS, Oweis YG, Eliades G. The effect of polishing technique on 3-D surface roughness and gloss of dental restorative resin composites. Oper Dent. 2013;38(1):E1-12.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Özel Y, Çelik Ç, Karabulut E. [The effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of composites.]. SÜ Dişhek Fak Der. 2008; 17: 39-43.
- Ozgünaltay G, Yazici AR, Görücü J. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth-coloured restoratives. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(2):218-24.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Moda MD, Godas AGL, Fernandes JC, Suzuki TYU, Guedes APA, Briso ALF, et al. Comparison of different polishing methods on the surface roughness of microhybrid, microfill, and nanofill composite resins. J Investig Clin Dent. 2018;9(1).[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yildiz E. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites. Eur J Dent. 2012;6(2):198-205.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Koh R, Neiva G, Dennison J, Yaman P. Finishing systems on the final surface roughness of composites. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008;9(2):138-45.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Uçtaşli MB, Arisu HD, Omürlü H, Eligüzeloğlu E, Ozcan S, Ergun G. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8(2):89-96.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gonulol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent. 2012; 40(2):64-70.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tuncer D, Halacoglu DM, Celik C, Arhun N. Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems On Surface Roughness of Different Types of Resin Composites. Yeditepe J Dent. 2016;12(2):25-30.[Crossref]
- Guler AU, Guler E, Yucel AC, Ertas E. Effects of polishing procedures on color stability of composite resins. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17:108-12.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Watanabe T, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Rikuta A, Ando S. Influence of polishing duration on surface roughness of resin composites. J Oral Sci. 2005;47:21-5.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ergucu Z, Turkun LS, Aladag A. Color stability of nanocomposites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2008;33:413-20.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Weitman RT, Eames WB. Plaque accumulation on composite surfaces after various finishing procedures. J Am Dent Assoc. 1975;91:101-6.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Shintani H, Satou J, Satou N, Hayashihara H, Inoue T. Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite resins. Dent Mater. 1985;1:225-7.[Crossref]
.: Process List