Objective: The aim of this study was to reveal common unmet psychosocial needs and strategies of coping with unmet psychosocial needs of hospitalized individual with hematological cancers and family caregiver dyads. Material and Methods: The study had a qualitative descriptive design which was conducted 12 with hematological cancer patients and family caregiver dyads. The data were collected face to face by semi-structured interview method. Interviews were conducted with a semi-structured interview form and audio recorder. Data that are obtained from the semi-structured interviews were analyzed with Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Results: Thematic data analysis showed four main themes. 1) Shared difficult emotions: Under the theme, dyads expressed their worries and emotions. 2) Shared social needs: Concerning the theme, dyads reported experiencing social isolation and mentioned shelter needs of the caregivers. 3) Struggling to cope with unmet psychosocial needs: Under the theme, dyads use hiding their feelings and opinions from each other, and maladaptive coping strategies like taking alcohol. Also, they expect psychosocial support services. 4) Information needs: Concerning the theme, dyads reported their information needs during the hospitalization process and after discharge. Conclusion: Individual with hematological cancers and their caregiver dyads need holistic care especially interventions about information needs and coping strategies for suffering emotions. It can be recommended that nurses perform dyadic psychosocial interventions dealing with the dyads to fulfill their common needs.
Keywords: Caregiver; hematological neoplasms; need assessment; psychiatric nursing; qualitative research
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, hastanede yatan hematolojik kanserli birey ve bakım veren çiftlerin ortak karşılanmamış psikososyal bakım gereksinimlerini ve karşılanmayan psikososyal gereksinimleriyle baş etme stratejilerini ortaya koymaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Araştırma tanımlayıcı kalitatif desendedir. Araştırmanın örneklemini 12 hematolojik kanser tanılı birey ve bakım veren çifti oluşturmaktadır. Veriler, yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme yöntemi ile yüz yüze toplanmıştır. Görüşmeler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu ve ses kayıt cihazı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmelerden elde edilen veriler Braun ve Clarke'nin tematik analiz yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: Verilerin analizinde 4 ana temaya ulaşılmıştır. 1) Paylaşılan Zor Duygular: Bu tema altında çiftler zor duygularından ve endişelerinden bahsetmişlerdir. 2) Paylaşılan Sosyal Gereksinimler: Bu tema ile ilişkili, çiftler sosyal izolasyon ve bakım verenlerinin barınma ihtiyaçlarından bahsetmişlerdir. 3) Karşılanmamış Psikososyal Gereksinimlerle Başa Çıkma Mücadelesi: Bu tema altında, çiftler duygularını ve düşüncelerini gizleyerek, alkol alma gibi maladaptif baş etme stratejileri kullanarak baş ettiklerini ifade etmişlerdir. Psikolojik destek beklemektedirler. 4) Bilgi Gereksinimleri: Bu tema ile ilişkili, çiftler hastanede yatış ve taburculuk süreçlerine ilişkin bilgi ihtiyaçlarından bahsetmişlerdir. Sonuç: Hematolojik kanser tanılı birey ve bakım veren çiftlerinin özellikle bilgi ve acı verici duygularla baş etme konusunda desteğe ihtiyaçları bulunmaktadır. Hemşirelerin hasta ve bakım veren çiftlerinin ortak gereksinimlerini dikkate alarak diyadik müdahaleler gerçekleştirmesi önerilmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Bakım verici; hematolojik neoplaziler; gereksinim değerlendirmesi; psikiyatri hemşireliği; kalitatif araştırma
- The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society [Internet]. [Cited: August 10, 2022]. Facts and Statistics Overview 2021. Available from: [Link]
- NICE. Haematological cancers: Improving outcomes. NICE guideline. 2016. [Cited: March 25, 2021]. Available from: [Link]
- Clinton-McHarg T, Carey M, Sanson-Fisher R, Tzelepis F, Bryant J, Williamson A. Anxiety and depression among haematological cancer patients attending treatment centres: prevalence and predictors. J Affect Disord. 2014;165:176-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- LeSeure P, Chongkham-Ang S. The experience of caregivers living with cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. J Pers Med. 2015;5(4):406-39. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Meier C, Taubenheim S, Lordick F, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, Götze H. Depression and anxiety in older patients with hematological cancer (70+) - Geriatric, social, cancer- and treatment-related associations. J Geriatr Oncol. 2020;11(5):828-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gok Metin Z, Karadas C, Balci C, Cankurtaran M. The perceived caregiver burden among Turkish family caregivers providing care for frail older adults. J Transcult Nurs. 2019;30(3):222-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Pulte D, Jansen L, Brenner H. Most up-to-date long-term survival estimates for common hematologic malignancies using the boomerang method. Blood. 2016;128(22):2409. [Crossref]
- Sant M, Minicozzi P, Mounier M, Anderson LA, Brenner H, Holleczek B, et al; EUROCARE-5 Working Group. Survival for haematological malignancies in Europe between 1997 and 2008 by region and age: results of EUROCARE-5, a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(9):931-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Serçe Ö, Günüşen NP. The interaction between hematological cancer patients and family caregivers and their life changes: a qualitative dyadic approach. Cancer Nurs. 2021;44(4):E201-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ernst J, Hinz A, Niederwieser D, Döhner H, Hönig K, Vogelhuber M, et al. Dyadic coping of patients with hematologic malignancies and their partners and its relation to quality of life-a longitudinal study. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017;58(3):655-65. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Bolks HN, Tuinstra J, Coyne JC. Distress in couples coping with cancer: a meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychol Bull. 2008;134(1):1-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Badr H, Bakhshaie J, Chhabria K. Dyadic interventions for cancer survivors and caregivers: state of the science and new directions. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019;35(4):337-41. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Sharma A, Saneha C, Phligbua W. Effects of dyadic interventions on quality of life among cancer patients: an integrative review. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2021;8(2):115-31. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Hu Y, Liu T, Li F. Association between dyadic interventions and outcomes in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(3):745-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Li Q, Loke AY. A systematic review of spousal couple-based intervention studies for couples coping with cancer: direction for the development of interventions. Psychooncology. 2014;23(7):731-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Capelan M, Battisti NML, McLoughlin A, Maidens V, Snuggs N, Slyk P, et al. The prevalence of unmet needs in 625 women living beyond a diagnosis of early breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2017;117(8):1113-20. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Watanabe K, Katayama K, Yoshioka T, Narimatsu H. Impact of individual background on the unmet needs of cancer survivors and caregivers - a mixed-methods analysis. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):263. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Niedzwiedz CL, Knifton L, Robb KA, Katikireddi SV, Smith DJ. Depression and anxiety among people living with and beyond cancer: a growing clinical and research priority. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):943. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-57. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Swash B, Hulbert-Williams N, Bramwell R. 'Haematological cancers, they're a funny bunch': a qualitative study of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patient experiences of unmet supportive care needs. J Health Psychol. 2018;23(11):1464-75. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. [Crossref]
- Pandey SC, Patnaik S. Establishing reliability and validity in qualitative inquiry: a critical examination. Jharkhand Journal of Development and Management Studies. 2014;12(1):5743-53.
- Shun SC, Chou YJ, Chen CH, Yang JC. Change of uncertainty in illness and unmet care needs in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma during active treatment. Cancer Nurs. 2018;41(4):279-89. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- van Roij J, Brom L, Youssef-El Soud M, van de Poll-Franse L, Raijmakers NJH. Social consequences of advanced cancer in patients and their informal caregivers: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(4):1187-95. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Karabekiroğlu A, Demir EY, Aker S, Kocamanoğlu B, Karabulut GS. Predictors of depression and anxiety among caregivers of hospitalised advanced cancer patients. Singapore Med J. 2018;59(11):572-7. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Koç MS, Aka BT. Doğruyol B, Curtiss J, Carpenter JK, Hofmann SG. Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the interpersonal emotion regulation questionnaire (IERQ). J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2019;41:294-303. [Crossref]
- Carlson LE. Mindfulness-based interventions for coping with cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016;1373(1):5-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kayser K, Acquati C, Reese JB, Mark K, Wittmann D, Karam E. A systematic review of dyadic studies examining relationship quality in couples facing colorectal cancer together. Psychooncology. 2018;27(1):13-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chircop D, Scerri J. Being diagnosed with cancer: the experiences of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(23-24):4899-904. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rood JA, Eeltink CM, van Zuuren FJ, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Huijgens PC. Perceived need for information of patients with haematological malignancies: a literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(3-4):353-69. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List