Objective: This study was conducted to determine the effect of patients' relatives' empathy level on their perception of cancer. Material and Methods: This study was designed as descriptive research. It was carried out at a university hospital located east of Turkey. The universe of the research was constituted by patient relatives at the aforementioned hospital and other healthy individuals. Data were collected using the Personal Introduction Form, the Questionnaire for Measuring Attitudes Toward Cancer (Cancer Stamp)-Community Version, and the Empathy Level Scale designed by the researchers of this study 1,006 relatives of patients constitute the sample of the study. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, correlation, regression, and Cronbach's alpha reliability analysis. The results of the analysis of the data collected for this study were evaluated within a 95% confidence interval, and significance was determined as p<0.05. Results: It was found that participants had positive perceptions of cancer, that their empathy scores were high, and that their cognitive empathy was higher than their social skills and emotional response. The presence of family members and the degree of relationship with them were important determinants for the questionnaire measuring attitudes toward cancer (cancer stigma) community version. Conclusion: In this study, a significant negative correlation was found between empathy and cancer-related perceptions. Respondents' attitudes toward cancer were found to change positively as empathy increased.
Keywords: Empathy; cancer perceptions; patient relative
Amaç: Bu çalışma, hasta yakınlarının empati düzeylerinin, kanserin algılanışına olan etkisinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışma, tanımlayıcı araştırma olarak tasarlanmıştır. Araştırma Türkiye'nin doğusunda bulunan bir üniversite hastanesinde yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın evrenini söz konusu hastanedeki hasta yakınları ve diğer sağlıklı bireyler oluşturmuştur. Veriler, bu çalışmanın araştırmacıları tarafından tasarlanmış olan Kişisel Tanıtım Formu, Kansere İlişkin Tutumları Ölçme Anketi (Kanser Damgası)- Toplum Versiyonu ve Empati Düzeyi Belirleme Ölçeği aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Çalışmanın örneklemini 1.006 hasta yakını oluşturmaktadır. Verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistikler, bağımsız örneklem t-testi, korelasyon analizi, regresyon analizi ve Cronbach's alfa güvenirlik analizi kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışmada toplanan verilerin analiz sonuçları %95 güven aralığında değerlendirilmiştir ve anlamlılık p<0,05 olarak belirlenmiştir. Bulgular: Katılımcıların kansere yönelik algılarının olumlu, empati düzeylerinin yüksek, bilişsel empati düzeylerinin ise sosyal beceri ve duygusal tepki düzeylerinden yüksek olduğu saptanmıştır. Aile üyelerinin varlığı ve onlarla olan ilişki derecesinin, Kansere İlişkin Tutumları Ölçme Anketi (Kanser Damgası)-Toplum Versiyonu için önemli bir belirleyici olduğu saptanmıştır. Sonuç: Çalışmada, empati ve kansere ilişkin algı arasında güçlü negatif korelasyon saptanmıştır. Bireylerin empati düzeyleri arttıkça kansere karşı tutumlarının olumlu yönde değiştiği bulunmuştur.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Empati; kanser algısı; hasta yakını
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- World Cancer Research Funda International [Internet]. [Cited: April 23, 2022]. Worldwide cancer data 2022. Available from: [Link]
- Robb KA, Simon AE, Miles A, Wardle J. Public perceptions of cancer: a qualitative study of the balance of positive and negative beliefs. BMJ Open. 2014;4(7):1-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Cho J, Choi EK, Kim SY, Shin DW, Cho BL, Kim CH, et al. Association between cancer stigma and depression among cancer survivors: a nationwide survey in Korea. Psychooncology. 2013;22(10):2372-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yılmaz M, Dişsiz G, Göçmen F, Usluoğlu AK, Alacacıoğlu A. The study Turkish version of validation and reliability of a questionnaire for measuring attitudes toward cancer (cancer stigma)-community version. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences. 2017;20(2):99-106. [Link]
- Chung AH, Slater MD. Reducing stigma and out-group distinctions through perspective-taking in narratives. Journal of Communication. 2013;63(5):894-911. [Crossref]
- Topçu Ç, Baker-Erdur Ö, Çapa-Aydın Y. Turkish Adaptation of Basic Empathy Scale: Validity and Reliability Study. Turkish Journal of Psychological Counseling and Guidance. 2010;4(34):174-82. [Link]
- Jones KM, Ruthig JC. The impact of positive thinking, gender, and empathy on social attributions for cancer outcomes. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues. 2015;34(4):762-71. [Crossref]
- Özmen S, Erdem R. Damgalamanın kavramsal çerçevesi [Conceptual framework of the stigmatization]. Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences of Süleyman Demirel University. 2018;23(1):185-208. [Link]
- Steffen LE, Vowles KE, Smith BW, Gan GN, Edelman MJ. Daily diary study of hope, stigma, and functioning in lung cancer patients. Health Psychol. 2018;37(3):218-27. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Threader J, McCormack L. Cancer-related trauma, stigma and growth: the 'lived' experience of head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016;25(1):157-69. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wang QX, Bai Y, Lu GF, Zhang CY. Perceived health-related stigma among patients with breast cancer. Chinese Nursing Research. 2017;4(4):158-61. [Crossref]
- Merdin A, Avci F. Toplumsal kanser ve hematoloji bilinci [Cancer and hematology awareness of the community]. Turkish Journal of Oncology. 2013;28(4):150-3. [Crossref]
- Vachon ML. Targeted intervention for family and professional caregivers: attachment, empathy, and compassion. Palliat Med. 2016;30(2):101-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cho J, Smith K, Choi EK, Kim IR, Chang YJ, Park HY, et al. Public attitudes toward cancer and cancer patients: a national survey in Korea. Psychooncology. 2013;22(3):605-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lawrence EJ, Shaw P, Baker D, Baron-Cohen S, David AS. Measuring empathy: reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychol Med. 2004;34(5):911-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kaya B, Çolakoğlu Ö. Empati Düzeyi Belirleme Ölçeği (EDBÖ) Uyarlama Çalışması [Adaptation Study of the Empathy Level Determination Scale (EDI)]. Journal of İnönü University Faculty of Education. 2015;16(1):17-30. [Link]
- Akgün Şahin Z, Kardaş Özdemir F. Hemşirelerin iletişim ve empati beceri düzeylerinin belirlenmesi [Communication and empathi skill levels of nurses]. JAREN. 2015;1(1):1-7. [Crossref]
- Kongsuwan W, Chaipetch O. Thai Buddhists' experiences caring for family members who died a peaceful death in intensive care. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2011;17(7):329-36. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Goldsmith J, Ragan SL. Palliative care and the family caregiver: trading mutual pretense (empathy) for a sustained gaze (compassion). Behav Sci (Basel). 2017;7(2):19. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Yıldırım B, Erkul E. Meaning-Centered Group Study Among Cancer Patients. International Congress on Politic, Economic and Social Studies, Venedik, İtalya, 28-30 Haziran 2018.
- Gotay CC, Shimizu H, Muraoka M, Ishihara Y, Tsuboi K, Ogawa H. Cancer-related attitudes: a comparative study in Japan and the US. Psychooncology. 2004;13(9):665-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ersin F, Kissal A, Polat P, Benan D, Erdoğan M. Kadın sağlık personelinin servikal kansere yönelik algıları ve bunu etkileyen faktörler [Perceptions of female health personnel towards cervical cancer and factors affecting it]. HEMAR-G. 2016;18(2-3):31-43. [Link]
- Die Trill M. Anxiety and sleep disorders in cancer patients. EJC Suppl. 2013;11(2):216-24. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Jones KM. The Impact of Positive Thinking and Empathy Induction on Social Perceptions of Cancer [Ph.D.]. Ann Arbor: The University of North Dakota; 2016. (Date of access: 15.07.2018)
.: Process List