Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go Test, Functional Reach Test in individuals with stroke and to compare the distinctive sensitivity and specificity of these scales and tests for falling and non-falling individuals. Material and Methods: The 83 stroke individuals participated in the study. The balance level and risk of falling were evaluated with Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go Test and Functional Reach Test. To evaluate the differentiation of Berg Balance Scale, Timed up and Go Test and Functional Reach Test between falling and non-falling individuals with stroke, receiver operating characteristic analysis was used and the area under the curve was calculated. Results: According to the history of falling, we compared values of the Berg Balance Scale, Timed up and Go Test, and Functional Reach Test. It was seen that the individuals with the history of falling had lower Berg Balance Scale and Functional Reach Test values and higher the Timed Up and Go Test score (p˂0.05). The clinical cut-off points for the Berg Balance Scale, Timed up and Go Test, Functional Reach Test was calculated as 45.5 points (area under the curve=0.731), 15.22 sec (area under the curve=0.707), 22.25 cm (area under the curve=0.714), respectively. Conclusion: As a result of this study, it was found that all tests identified individuals who fell and did not fall; however, the Berg Balance Scale was more sensitive in determining the risk of falling. Our results are important in terms of showing reference values for clinicians working in neurological rehabilitation.
Keywords: Stroke; postural balance; falling; cut-off point
Amaç: Çalışmamızın amacı, inmeli bireylerde Berg Denge Ölçeği, Zamanlı Kalk ve Yürü Testi, Fonksiyonel Uzanma Testi'ni incelemek ve bu ölçek ve testlerin, düşen ve düşmeyen bireyler için ayırt edici duyarlılığını ve özgüllüğünü karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya, 83 inmeli hasta katıldı. Denge seviyesi ve düşme riski Berg Denge Ölçeği, Zamanlı Kalk ve Yürü Testi ve Fonksiyonel Uzanma Testi ile değerlendirildi. Berg Denge Ölçeği, Zamanlı Kalk ve Yürü Testi, Fonksiyonel Uzanma Testinin, inmeli hastalarda düşen ve düşmeyen hastaları ayırt ediciliğini değerlendirmek amacıyla alıcı işletim karakteristiği eğrisi analizi yapıldı ve eğri altında kalan alan hesaplandı. Bulgular: Berg Denge Ölçeği, Zamanlı Kalk ve Yürü Testi, Fonksiyonel Uzanma Testi değerlerini düşme öyküsüne göre karşılaştırdığımızda, düşme öyküsü olan bireylerin daha düşük Berg Denge Ölçeği ve Fonksiyonel Uzanma Testi değerlerine sahip oldukları ve Zamanlı Kalk ve Yürü Testi sürelerinin daha yüksek olduğu görüldü (p˂0,05). Berg Denge Ölçeği, Zamanlı Kalk ve Yürü Testi, Fonksiyonel Uzanma Testi için klinik kesme noktası sırasıyla 45,5 puan (eğri altında kalan alan=0,731), 15,22 sn (eğri altında kalan alan=0,707), 22,25 cm (eğri altında kalan alan=0,714) olarak belirlendi. Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonucunda tüm testlerin düşen ve düşmeyen bireyleri belirlediği, ancak Berg Denge Ölçeğinin düşme riskini belirlemede daha hassas olduğu bulundu. Sonuçlarımız, nörolojik rehabilitasyon alanında çalışan klinisyenlere referans değerleri göstermesi açısından önemlidir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: İnme; postüral denge; düşme; kesme puanı
- Mackintosh SF, Hill KD, Dodd KJ, Goldie PA, Culham EG. Balance score and a history of falls in hospital predict recurrent falls in the 6 months following stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(12):1583-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kerse N, Parag V, Feigin VL, McNaughton H, Hackett ML, Bennett DA, et al; Auckland Regional Community Stroke (ARCOS) Study Group. Falls after stroke: results from the Auckland Regional Community Stroke (ARCOS) Study, 2002 to 2003. Stroke. 2008;39(6):1890-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Andersson AG, Kamwendo K, Appelros P. Fear of falling in stroke patients: relationship with previous falls and functional characteristics. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008;31(3):261-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Batchelor FA, Hill KD, Mackintosh SF, Said CM, Whitehead CH. Effects of a multifactorial falls prevention program for people with stroke returning home after rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(9):1648-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ashburn A, Hyndman D, Pickering R, Yardley L, Harris S. Predicting people with stroke at risk of falls. Age Ageing. 2008;37(3):270-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hyndman D, Ashburn A, Stack E. Fall events among people with stroke living in the community: circumstances of falls and characteristics of fallers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(2):165-70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Handelzalts S, Gray G, Steinberg-Henn F, Soroker N, Melzer I. Characteristics of proactive balance and gait performance in subacute stroke patients demonstrating varying reactive balance capacity: a research study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2020;46(4):491-500. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Blum L, Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008;88(5):559-66. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Alenazi AM, Alshehri MM, Alothman S, Rucker J, Dunning K, D'Silva LJ, et al. Functional reach, depression scores, and number of medications are associated with number of falls in people with chronic stroke. PM R. 2018;10(8):806-16. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- An SH, Park DS, and Lim JY. Discriminative validity of the timed up and go test for community ambulation in persons with chronic stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;6(4):176-81. [Crossref]
- Schlenstedt C, Brombacher S, Hartwigsen G, Weisser B, Möller B, Deuschl G. Comparing the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale with the Mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale to assess postural control in patients with Parkinson disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(2):218-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Pinto EB, Nascimento C, Marinho C, Oliveira I, Monteiro M, Castro M, et al. Risk factors associated with falls in adult patients after stroke living in the community: baseline data from a stroke cohort in Brazil. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014;21(3):220-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Smith PS, Hembree JA, Thompson ME. Berg Balance Scale and functional reach: determining the best clinical tool for individuals post acute stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(7):811-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sahin F, Yilmaz F, Ozmaden A, Kotevolu N, Sahin T, Kuran B. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Berg Balance Scale. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2008;31(1):32-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Liaw LJ, Hsieh CL, Lo SK, Chen HM, Lee S, Lin JH. The relative and absolute reliability of two balance performance measures in chronic stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(9): 656-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hiengkaew V, Jitaree K, Chaiyawat P. Minimal detectable changes of the Berg Balance Scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale, Timed "Up & Go" Test, gait speeds, and 2-minute walk test in individuals with chronic stroke with different degrees of ankle plantarflexor tone. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(7):1201-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. 1st ed. London: CRC Press; 1990. [Crossref]
- Jácome C, Cruz J, Oliveira A, Marques A. Validity, reliability, and ability to ıdentify fall status of the Berg Balance Scale, BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest in patients with COPD. Phys Ther. 2016;96(11):1807-15. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chiu AY, Au-Yeung SS, Lo SK. A comparison of four functional tests in discriminating fallers from non-fallers in older people. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;7;25(1):45-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Maeda N, Urabe Y, Murakami M, Itotani K, Kato J. Discriminant analysis for predictor of falls in stroke patients by using the Berg Balance Scale. Singapore Med J. 2015;56(5):280-3. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Simpson LA, Miller WC, Eng JJ. Effect of stroke on fall rate, location and predictors: a prospective comparison of older adults with and without stroke. PLoS One. 2011;29;6(4):e19431. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Tsang CS, Liao LR, Chung RC, Pang MY. Psychometric properties of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) in community-dwelling individuals with chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2013;93(8):1102-15. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Madhavan S, Bishnoi A. Comparison of the Mini-Balance Evaluations Systems Test with the Berg Balance Scale in relationship to walking speed and motor recovery post stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017;24(8):579-84. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Sahin IE, Guclu-Gunduz A, Yazici G, Ozkul C, Volkan-Yazici M, Nazliel B, et al. The sensitivity and specificity of the balance evaluation systems test-BESTest in determining risk of fall in stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;44(1):67-77. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Alghadir AH, Al-Eisa ES, Anwer S, Sarkar B. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of three scales for measuring balance in patients with chronic stroke. BMC Neurol. 2018;13;18(1):141. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Flansbjer UB, Blom J, Brogårdh C. The reproducibility of Berg Balance Scale and the single-leg Stance in chronic stroke and the relationship between the two tests. PM R. 2012;4(3):165-70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Phys Ther. 2000;80(9):896-903. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Whitney JC, Lord SR, Close JC. Streamlining assessment and intervention in a falls clinic using the Timed Up and Go Test and physiological profile assessments. Age Ageing. 2005;34(6):567-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Greene BR, Doheny EP, Walsh C, Cunningham C, Crosby L, Kenny RA. Evaluation of falls risk in community-dwelling older adults using body-worn sensors. Gerontology. 2012;58(5):472-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kojima G, Masud T, Kendrick D, Morris R, Gawler S, Treml J, et al. Does the timed up and go test predict future falls among British community-dwelling older people? Prospective cohort study nested within a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2015;3;15:38. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Carling A, Forsberg A, Nilsagård Y. "Berg balance scale" and "timed up and go" discriminates between fallers and non-fallers, in people with MS. In: 6th International Symposium on Gait and Balance in Multiple Sclerosis. Portland, OR, US; 2016: 9-10. [Link]
.: Process List