Objective: To evaluate the effects of photochromic contact lenses (CL) on contrast sensitivity, aberrations and pupillary diameter in indoor environments. Material and Methods: Contrast sensitivity of the participants was measured and their pupillography under scotopic, mesopic and photopic illumination and topography were taken. Transparent senofilcon A (Acuvue Oasys hydraLuxe) CL was inserted to one eye of the subjects and photochromic senofilcon A (Acuvue Oasys with transitions) CL was inserted to the other eye. Subsequently, contrast sensitivity of subjects was measured, pupillography and topography were taken again over the CL. Aberration values were obtained from the topography. In terms of occurred changes, the eye with photochromic CL was compared with the other eye. Results: Before CL insertion, there was no significant difference between the photochromic side and the other side in terms of all parameters examined (for all; p>0.05). After CL insertion, there was no significant change in scotopic, mesopic and photopic pupil diameters on both the photochromic and transparent sides compared to the pre-CL condition (for all; p>0.05), high order aberrations increased (p0.05). Conclusion: Using the photochromic CL in indoors does not lead to different results than the transparent CL in terms of visual quality and pupil diameters. Both lenses cause a decrease in contrast sensitivity at high frequencies.
Keywords: Photochromic contact lens; contrast sensitivity; pupillary diameter; high-order aberrations
Amaç: Fotokromik kontakt lenslerin (KL) iç ortamlarda kontrast duyarlılık, aberasyonlar ve pupilla çapı üzerine etkilerini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Katılımcıların kontrast duyarlılıkları ölçülüp topografileri ve skotopik, mezopik ve fotopik aydınlatmada pupillografileri çekildi. Bireylerin rastgele bir gözlerine şeffaf senofilcon A KL (Acuvue Oasys hydraLuxe) diğer gözlerine ise fotokromik senofilcon A (Acuvue Oasys with transitions) KL takıldı. Daha sonra bireylerin tekrar kontrast duyarlılığı ölçülüp KL üzerinden topografi ve pupillografileri çekildi. Topografiden aberasyon değerleri elde edildi. Meydana gelen değişiklikler açısından fotokromik KL takılan göz ile diğer göz karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: KL takılmadan önce fotokromik taraf ile diğer taraf arasında incelenen bütün parametreler açısından anlamlı bir fark yok idi (hepsi için; p>0,05). KL takıldıktan sonra hem fotokromik hem de şeffaf tarafta KL öncesi duruma göre skotopik, mezopik ve fotopik pupil çaplarında anlamlı bir değişiklik olmadı (hepsi için; p>0,05), yüksek sıralı aberasyonlar arttı (p0,05). Sonuç: İç mekânlarda çalışmamızda değerlendirilen fotokromik veya şeffaf KL'nin kullanılması görme kalitesi ve pupil çapları açısından farklı sonuçlara yol açmamaktadır. Her iki KL de yüksek frekanslarda kontrast duyarlılıkta düşüşe yol açmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Fotokromik kontakt lens; kontrast duyarlılık; pupilla çapı; yüksek sıralı aberasyonlar
- Hammond BR, Johnson BA, George ER. Oxidative photodegradation of ocular tissues: beneficial effects of filtering and exogenous antioxidants. Exp Eye Res. 2014;129:135-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Renzi-Hammond LM, Hammond BR Jr. The effects of photochromic lenses on visual performance. Clin Exp Optom. 2016;99(6):568-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Aslam TM, Haider D, Murray IJ. Principles of disability glare measurement: an ophthalmological perspective. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(4):354-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dada VK, Sinha R. Textbook of Contact Lenses. 5th ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd; 2017.
- Renzi-Hammond L, Buch JR, Cannon J, Hacker L, Toubouti Y, Hammond BR. A contra-lateral comparison of the visual effects of a photochromic vs. non-photochromic contact lens. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(3):250-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sayre RM, Dowdy JC, Poh-Fitzpatrick M. Dermatological risk of indoor ultraviolet exposure from contemporary lighting sources. Photochem Photobiol. 2004;80:47-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Renzi-Hammond LM, Buch JR, Hacker L, Cannon J, Hammond BR Jr. The Effect of a photochromic contact lens on visual function indoors: a randomized, controlled trial. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97(7):526-30. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Öner Ö, Akça Bayar S, Oto S, Gökmen O, Tekindal MA. Contrast Sensitivity in microtropic and anisometropic eyes of successfully treated amblyopes. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2017;47(2):74-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Prakash G, Srivastava D, Suhail M, Bacero R. Assessment of bilateral pupillary centroid characteristics at varying illuminations and post-photopic flash response using an automated pupillometer. Clin Exp Optom. 2016;99(6):535-43. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Buch JR, Sonoda L, Cannon JL. Lens fitting and subjective acceptance of senofilcon A with photochromic additive on a neophyte population. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021;44(4):101369. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Glavas IP, Patel S, Donsoff I, Stenson S. Sunglasses- and photochromic lens-wearing patterns in spectacle and/or contact lens-wearing individuals. Eye Contact Lens. 2004;30(2):81-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Park HM, Ryu YU, Park IJ, Chu BS. Can tinted lenses be used to manipulate pupil size and visual performance when wearing multifocal contact lenses? Clin Optom (Auckl). 2020;12:27-35. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Demir M, Kurna SA, Sengor T, Atakan TG, Sahin T. Assessment of aberrations and visual quality differences between myopic and astigmatic eyes before and after contact lens application. North Clin Istanb. 2015;2(1):1-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Cox I, Holden BA. Soft contact lens-induced longitudinal spherical aberration and its effect on contrast sensitivity. Optom Vis Sci. 1990;67(9):679-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Buch JR, Toubouti Y, Cannon J. Randomized crossover trial evaluating the impact of senofilcon a photochromic lens on driving performance. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97(1):15-23. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Montés-Micó R, Belda-Salmerón L, Ferrer-Blasco T, Albarrán-Diego C, García-Lázaro S. On-eye optical quality of daily disposable contact lenses for different wearing times. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013;33(5):581-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Roberts B, Athappilly G, Tinio B, Naikoo H, Asbell P. Higher order aberrations induced by soft contact lenses in normal eyes with myopia. Eye Contact Lens. 2006;32(3):138-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dietze HH, Cox MJ. Correcting ocular spherical aberration with soft contact lenses. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2004;21(4):473-85. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- López-Gil N, Castejón-Mochón JF, Benito A, Marín JM, Lo-a-Foe G, Marin G, et al. Aberration generation by contact lenses with aspheric and asymmetric surfaces. J Refract Surg. 2002;18(5):S603-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Nichols JJ, King-Smith PE. The effect of eye closure on the post-lens tear film thickness during silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. Cornea. 2003;22(6):539-44. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ho A. Aberration correction with soft contact lens: is the postlens tear film important? Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29(1 Suppl):S182-5; discussion S190-1, S192-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Maldonado-Codina C, Efron N. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the clinical performance of hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81(6):442-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Efron S, Efron N, Morgan PB. Optical and visual performance of aspheric soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(3):201-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Aydın Kurna S, Demir M, Altun A, Şengör T. The evaluation of the effects of differently-designed toric soft contact lenses on visual quality. Turk J Ophthalmol 2013;43:253-7. [Crossref]
.: Process List