Objective: This study aimed to examine electronic nursing care plans for patients who received treatment due to the diagnosis of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in the intensive care units of a hospital. Material and Methods: The sample of this descriptive and retrospective study consisted of the electronic nursing care plans of 429 patients who received treatment due to the diagnosis of COVID-19 in the intensive care units of a hospital between 15 March, 2020 and 15 March, 2022. Data were collected between June and July 2022 using a descriptive characteristics form, a patient care plan evaluation form, and the quality measurement tool for nursing diagnosis, interventions, and outcomes. Results: The nurses were found to use 27 different nursing diagnoses in their care plans and they mostly preferred the nursing diagnoses of risk for infection (n=608), risk for ineffective breathing pattern (n=282), and risk for ımpaired oral mucous membrane integrity (n=233). The nurses labeled 87.66% of the nursing diagnosis correctly and identified 72.78% of the related factors and descriptive characteristics and 58.04% of the goals at an adequate level, 74.77% of the nursing interventions feasibly, and 47.26% of the evaluation at an adequate level. The mean score of the nurses for the quality measurement tool for nursing diagnosis, interventions, and outcomes was 51.82±6.89. Conclusion: It was seen that the nurses were sufficient in the electronic nursing process they prepared for the patients treated with the diagnosis of COVID-19, except for the evaluation, and the quality of the nursing process was above the average. It is recommended to provide training to nurses, especially for the evaluation stage of the nursing process.
Keywords: COVID-19; intensive care unit; nursing care planning; nursing process
Amaç: Bu çalışma, bir hastanenin yoğun bakım ünitesinde koronavirüs hastalığı-2019 [coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)] tanısı ile tedavi görmüş hastaların elektronik hemşirelik bakım planlarının incelenmesi amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Tanımlayıcı ve retrospektif türde yürütülen çalışmanın örneklemini, 15 Mart 2020-15 Mart 2022 tarihleri arasında yoğun bakım ünitelerinde COVID-19 tanısı ile tedavi görmüş 429 hastanın elektronik hemşirelik bakım planları oluşturdu. Veriler, tanımlayıcı özellikler formu, hasta bakım planı değerlendirme formu, hemşirelik tanıları, girişimleri ve sonuçları için kalite ölçüm aracı ile Haziran-Temmuz 2022 tarihleri arasında toplandı. Bulgular: Hemşirelerin bakım planlarında 27 farklı hemşirelik tanısı kullandıkları, en çok enfeksiyon riski (n=608), solunum fonksiyonlarında etkisizlik riski (n=282) ve oral mukoz membranda bozulma riski (n=233) hemşirelik tanılarını tercih ettikleri görüldü. Hemşirelik tanı etiketlerinin %87,66'sının doğru, ilişkili olduğu faktör ve tanımlayıcı özelliklerin %72,78'i ve hedeflerin %58,04'ünün yeterli, hemşirelik girişimlerinin %74,77'sinin uygun ve değerlendirmenin %47,26'sının yeterli olduğu belirlendi. Hemşirelik tanıları, girişimleri ve sonuçları için kalite aracı puan ortalamasının 51,82±6,89 olduğu saptandı. Sonuç: Hemşirelerin COVID-19 tanısı ile tedavi gören hastalar için hazırladıkları elektronik hemşirelik sürecinde, değerlendirme dışındaki aşamalarda yeterli oldukları ve hemşirelik süreci kalitesinin ortalamanın üzerinde olduğu görüldü. Hemşirelere, hemşirelik sürecinin özellikle değerlendirme aşamasına yönelik eğitimlerin planlanması önerilmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: COVID-19; yoğun bakım üniteleri; hemşirelik bakım planı; hemşirelik süreci
- Berman A, Snyder SJ, Frandsen G. Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing, Concepts, Process, and Practice. 10th ed. Harlow, Essex: Pearson; 2016.
- Vicdan AK, Karabacak BG, Ecevit Alpar S. Classification of 2012-2014 NANDA-I nursings using the Nursing Model Based on Activities of Living. IJHS. 2015;12(2):1626-36. [Crossref]
- Pérez Rivas FJ, Martín-Iglesias S, Pacheco del Cerro JL, Minguet Arenas C, García López M, Beamud Lagos M. Effectiveness of nursing process use in primary care. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2016;27(1):43-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Johnson L, Edward KL, Giandinoto JA. A systematic literature review of accuracy in nursing care plans and using standardised nursing language. Collegian. 2018;25(3):355-61. [Crossref]
- Tsai CH, Eghdam A, Davoody N, Wright G, Flowerday S, Koch S. Effects of electronic health record implementation and barriers to adoption and use: a scoping review and qualitative analysis of the content. Life (Basel). 2020;10(12):327. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Häyrinen K, Lammintakanen J, Saranto K. Evaluation of electronic nursing documentation--nursing process model and standardized terminologies as keys to visible and transparent nursing. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(8):554-64. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- McCarthy B, Fitzgerald S, O'Shea M, Condon C, Hartnett-Collins G, Clancy M, et al. Electronic nursing documentation interventions to promote or improve patient safety and quality care: a systematic review. J Nurs Manag. 2019;27(3):491-501. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Göçmen-Baykara Z, Eyüboğlu G. Nursing care in the COVID-19 pandemic [COVID-19 pandemisinde hemşirelik bakımı]. Gazi Journal of Health Sciences. 2020;special um:9-17. [Link]
- Tosun H, Tosun A, Ödül Özkaya B, Gül A. The most commonly determined nursing diagnoses according to NANDA-I taxonomy and difficulties using the nursing process in COVID-19 outbreak. Clin Nurs Res. 2022;31(3):395-403. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Moorhead S, Macieira TGR, Lopez KD, Mantovani VM, Swanson E, Wagner C, et al. NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC linkages to SARS-Cov-2 (Covid-19): part 1. Community response. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2021;32(1):59-67. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Cengiz D, Furuncu S, Çoban F, Katran HB, Çavuşlu M, Erten N, et al. COVID-19 tanısı ile kök hücre tedavisi yapılan hastaların hemşirelik bakım planlarının değerlendirilmesi [Examination of nursing care plans of intensive care patients with stem cell transplant in the COVID-19 pandemic]. Yoğun Bakım Hemşireliği Dergisi. 2021;25(3):160-8. [Link]
- Barioni EMS, Nascimento CDSD, Amaral TLM, Ramalho Neto JM, Prado PRD. Clinical indicators, nursing diagnoses, and mortality risk in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2022;56:e20210568. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tuğrul E, Denat Y, Karaçam Z, Şahbaz M. Hemşirelik tanıları, girişimleri ve sonuçları için kalite ölçüm aracının Türkçe formu: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Turkish form of the quality measurement tool for nursing diagnosis, interventions and outcomes: validity and reliability study]. Medical Sciences. 2021;16(2):106-21. [Crossref]
- Cortinhal V, Pereira A, Correia S, Deodato S. Responses presented by adult patients with COVID-19, based on the formulated nursing diagnoses: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(10):6332. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Struyf T, Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, Takwoingi Y, Davenport C, Leeflang MM, et al; Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group. Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;5(5):CD013665. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Allande-Cussó R, Fernández-García E, Barrientos-Trigo S, Rapela-Sánchez-Campa MÁ, Porcel-Gálvez AM. Implementing holistic care in isolated patients during COVID-19 pandemic: a case study using nursing outcomes (NOC) and interventions (NIC) classifications. Holist Nurs Pract. 2021;35(6):326-31. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Sánchez-Almagro CP, Romero-Sánchez JM, White-Ríos M, González Del Pino CA, Paloma-Castro O. NANDA International nursing diagnoses in the coping/stress tolerance domain and their linkages to Nursing Outcomes Classification outcomes and Nursing Interventions Classification interventions in the pre-hospital emergency care. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(10):3273-89. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Bahramnezhad F, Asgari P. Spiritual care for COVID-19 patients: a neglected necessity. Infect Dis Clin Pract. 2021;29(1):e63. [Crossref]
- Ackley BJ, Ladwig GB, Makic MBF. Nursing Diagnosis Handbook: An Evidence-Based Guide To Planning Care.11th ed. Missouri: Elsevier; 2016.
- Büyükyılmaz F, Kaya H. Elektronik hemşirelik kayıtlarının yapılandırılması: sistematik literatür incelemesi [Structuring electronic nursing records: systematic literature review]. Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2016;24(2):106-17. [Link]
- Çakar S, Avşar G. Determining the problems of clinical nurses about the use of nursing process. Journal of Midwifery and Health Sciences. 2020;3(3):203-13. [Link]
- Taghavi Larijani T, Saatchi B. Training of NANDA-I nursing diagnoses (NDs), nursing ınterventions classification (NIC) and nursing outcomes classification (NOC), in psychiatric wards: a randomized controlled trial. Nurs Open. 2019;6(2):612-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Demiray T, Babaoğlu E. Examination of nurses' views on care plans applied in electronic environment: a qualitative study. Journal of Nursing Science. 2021;4(1):11-7. [Link]
- Saraswasta IWG, Hariyati RTS. The implementation of electronic-based nursing care documentation on quality of nursing care: a literature review. Int J Nurs Health Serv. 2018;1(2):19-31. [Crossref]
- Teuly JF, Barrios CJC, Garrido M, Tallarita AD, Boyardi V, Cisneros MCE. Quality of the clinical nursing records of a neonatal-intensive care unit. Enferm Glob. 2022;21(3):476-87. [Crossref]
- Benezech A, Bouvier M, Vitton V. Faecal incontinence: current knowledges and perspectives. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2016;7(1):59-71. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Condon M, Mannion E, Molloy DW, O'Caoimh R. Urinary and faecal incontinence: point prevalence and predictors in a university hospital. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(2):194. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Fischer D, Snider SB, Barra ME, Sanders WR, Rapalino O, Schaefer P, et al. Disorders of consciousness associated With COVID-19: a prospective multimodal study of recovery and brain connectivity. Neurology. 2022;98(3):e315-25. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Knaus ME, Ahmad H, Metzger GA, Beyene TJ, Thomas JL, Weaver LJ, et al. Outcomes of a telemedicine bowel management program during COVID-19. J Pediatr Surg. 2022;57(1):80-85. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Boehme AK, Doyle K, Thakur KT, Roh D, Park S, Agarwal S, et al. Disorders of consciousness in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: the role of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Neurocrit Care. 2022;36(1):89-96. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Lopes Jde L, de Barros AL, Michel JL. A pilot study to validate the priority nursing interventions classification interventions and nursing outcomes classification outcomes for the nursing diagnosis "excess fluid volume" in cardiac patients. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2009;20(2):76-88. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yom YH, Chi SA, Yoo HS. Application of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes to patients undergoing abdominal surgery in Korea. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2002;13(3):77-87. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Taşdemir G, Kızılkaya M. Investigation of NANDA nursing diagnoses in the clinical practice of mental health and diseases nursing course of SYO students. International Journal of Human Sciences. 2013;10(1):246-57. [Link]
- Wang N, Yu P, Hailey D. The quality of paper-based versus electronic nursing care plan in Australian aged care homes: a documentation audit study. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84(8):561-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Akhu-Zaheya L, Al-Maaitah R, Bany Hani S. Quality of nursing documentation: paper-based health records versus electronic-based health records. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(3-4):e578-89. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List