Objective: To evaluate the success of primary teeth root canal treatments (RCTs) and restorations, as well as the effects of these treatments on the development and eruption of permanent teeth. Material and Methods: A total of 119 patients who underwent RCT of the primary teeth were included in the study. If the primary teeth to which the RCT was applied, the success of the restoration was evaluated according to the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Root canal fillings were classified as overfilled, normal, or underfilled. The effect of the RCT on the eruption of permanent teeth was investigated. Results: The mean follow-up period was 40 months (range 12- 72 months). The loss percentage in primary teeth increased as the follow-up period (>48 months) increased (p<0.001). A statistically significant difference was observed among the 3 restorative materials (p=0.011). There was a statistically significant difference in the rates of RCTs on primary teeth applied between dentists and specialist dentists (p=0.003). There was no significant difference between the level of root canal filling and the presence of teeth in the dental arch (p>0.05). Among the USPHS criteria, less sensitivity was reported in restorations made with glass ionomers and compomers than in those made with composites in terms of postoperative sensitivity (p<0.001). Conclusion: The type of material used for restorations and the clinical experience and skill of the dentist are essential factors that affect the success of RCT in primary teeth. Furthermore, in the current study, primary teeth RCT had no effect on the development and eruption of permanent teeth.
Keywords: Primary teeth; pulpectomy; United States Public Health Service; root canal treatment; success
Amaç: Süt dişi kök kanal tedavilerinin (KKT) ve üst restorasyonlarının başarıları ile bu tedavilerin daimi dişlerin gelişim ve sürme sürecine etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya süt dişlerine KKT yapılmış 119 hasta dâhil edildi. KKT uygulanan süt dişi ağızda ise restorasyonun başarısı Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Halk Sağlığı Servisi [United States Public Health Service (USPHS)] kriterlerine göre değerlendirildi. Kök kanal dolguları taşkın, normal veya eksik dolum olarak gruplandırıldı. Uygulanan KKT'nin alttaki daimi dişlerin sürmesi üzerindeki etkisi araştırıldı. Bulgular: KKT uygulanan dişlerde ortalama takip süresi 40 ay (12-72 ay) olarak belirlendi. Takip süresi uzadıkça (>48 ay) süt dişlerinde görülen kayıp yüzdelerinin arttığı gözlemlendi (p<0,001). Üç farklı restoratif materyal arasında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı şekilde fark görüldü (p=0,011). Uzman diş hekimleri ile diş hekimleri arasında uygulanan süt dişi kök kanal tedavilerinin ağızda bulunma oranlarında istatistiksel olarak farklılık tespit edildi (p=0,003). Kök kanal dolgusunun seviyesi ile dişlerin ağızda bulunma oranları arasında anlamlı bir fark görülmedi (p>0,05). USPHS kriterleri arasında, postoperatif hassasiyet açısından cam iyonomer ve kompomer ile yapılan restorasyonlarda, kompozit ile yapılanlara kıyasla daha az hassasiyet bildirildi (p<0,001). Sonuç: Üst restorasyonlarda kullanılan materyalin çeşidi ile tedaviyi uygulayan hekimin klinik tecrübe ve becerisi, süt dişi kök kanal tedavisi uygulamalarında başarıyı etkileyen önemli faktörlerdendir. Ayrıca mevcut çalışmada, süt dişi KKT'lerinin daimi dişlerin gelişim ve sürme süreci üzerine etkisi gözlenmemiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Süt dişi; pulpektomi; Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Halk Sağlığı Servisi; kök kanal tedavisi; başarı
- Markovic D, Zivojinovic V, Vucetic M. Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2005;6(3):133-8. [PubMed]
- Moskovitz M, Yahav D, Tickotsky N, Holan G. Long-term follow up of root canal treated primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010;20(3):207-13. [PubMed]
- Tognetti VM, Toledo EDS, Alves TM, Rizzardi KF, Parisotto TM, Pascon FM. Effect of two irrigating solutions on antimicrobial activity and clinical and radiographic success after endodontic treatment in primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(1):81. [PubMed]
- Yu B, Zhao S. The evaluation of effective rate and pain intensity of root canal treatment in primary teeth-a retrospective study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024;48(2):88-92. [PubMed]
- El-Desouky SS, El Fahl BN, Kabbash IA, Hadwa SM. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of shaping ability of kedo-S square and fanta AF? baby rotary files compared to manual K-files in root canal preparation of primary anterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(6):340. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature-Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J. 2008;41(1):6-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sridhar N, Tandon S. Continued root-end growth and apexification using a calcium hydroxide and iodoform paste (Metapex®): three case reports. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010;11(5):063-70. [PubMed]
- Liao X, Chen C, Liao Z, Chang H, Yang G, Ding G. Survival analysis of pulpotomy versus pulpectomy in primary molars with carious pulp exposure: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1370. [Crossref]
- Stallaert KM, Sigal MJ, Titley KC, Andrews PB. A retrospective study of root canal therapy in non-vital primary molars. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2016;17(4):295-300. [PubMed]
- Mortazavi M, Mesbahi M. Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2004;14(6):417-24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Vishwanathaiah S, Maganur PCG. Clinical and radiographic success rate of the root canal filling materials used in primary teeth: a systematic review. Dent Med Probl. 2024;61(3):447-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Pulp Therapy for Primary and Immature Permanent Teeth. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago, IL: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2025. [Link]
- Subramaniam P, Gilhotra K. Endoflas, zinc oxide eugenol and metapex as root canal filling materials in primary molars--a comparative clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;35(4):365-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chen Z, Li M, Chen Y, Xie Y, Chen X, Qiu H, et al. Survival analysis of primary molars following pulpectomy performed under dental general anesthesia: a five-year retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1202. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Casas MJ, Kenny DJ, Johnston DH, Judd PL. Long-term outcomes of primary molar ferric sulfate pulpotomy and root canal therapy. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26(1):44-8. [PubMed]
- Kirzioglu Z, Gungor OE, Ciftci ZZ. Evaluation of the restoration success of endodontic therapy of the primary molars. Eur J Dent. 2011;5(4):415-22. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Sari S, Okte Z. Success rate of Sealapex in root canal treatment for primary teeth: 3-year follow-up. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105(4):e93-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Olczak-Kowalczyk D, Samul M, Góra J, Gozdowski D, Turska-Szybka A. Ferric sulfate and formocresol pulpotomies in paediatric dental practice. A prospective-retrospective study. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2019;20(1):27-32. [PubMed]
- Ibrahim AA, Fadlalla NB, Nory NF, Abu-bakr NH. Difficulties in performing root canal treatment among dental students in Sudan. Indian J Dent. 2012;3(4):196-200. [Link]
- Elsayed RO, Abu-Bakr NH, Ibrahim YE. Quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate dental students at the University of Khartoum, Sudan. Aust Endod J. 2011;37(2):56-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Stallaert KM. A retrospective study of root canal therapy in non-vital primary molars [Master thesis]. Ottawa: University of Toronto; 2011. [Cited: Novermber 15, 2024]. Available from: [Link]
- Bawazir OA, Salama FS. Clinical evaluation of root canal obturation methods in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2006;28(1):39-47. [PubMed]
.: Process List