Amaç: Tip 1 diabetes mellituslu çocuklarda statik ve dinamik pupilla yanıtlarını araştırmak ve bu sonuçları sağlıklı çocuklardan elde edilen verilerle karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu ileriye dönük çalışmaya, retinopatisi olmayan iyi kontrollü Tip 1 diabetes mellituslu çocuklar (diabetes mellitus grubu) ve benzer yaş ve cinsiyetteki sağlıklı çocuklar (kontrol grubu) dâhil edildi. Statik ve dinamik pupilla yanıtları otomatik, kantitatif pupillometri cihazı (MonPack One, Vision Monitor System, Metrovision, Fransa) kullanılarak yapıldı. Statik pupillometri ölçümlerinden skotopik, mezopik, düşük fotopik ve yüksek fotopik pupil çapları kaydedildi. Dinamik pupillometri ölçümlerinden ise dinlenme çapı, pupil kontraksiyon amplitüdü, pupil kontraksiyon latansı, pupil kontraksiyon süresi, pupil kontraksiyon hızı, pupil dilatasyon latansı, pupil dilatasyon süresi ve pupil dilatasyon hızı değerleri kaydedildi. Bulgular: Çalışmada toplam 83 hastanın 83 gözü incelendi: 43 hasta diabetes mellitus grubunu, 40 hasta ise kontrol grubunu oluşturdu. Diabetes mellitus ve kontrol grubunda yaş ve cinsiyet açısından istatistiksel anlamlı fark izlenmedi. Diabetes mellitus grubunda skotopik, mezopik, düşük fotopik ve yüksek fotopik ortamlardaki pupil çapları kontrol grubuna göre düşükse de bu farklar istatistiksel anlamlı düzeye ulaşamadı. Dinamik pupillometri ölçümlerinden sadece pupil kontraksiyon amplitüdü değerleri diabetes mellitus grubunda kontrol grubuna göre istatistiksel anlamlı düzeyde düşük idi. Sonuç: Retinopatisi olmayan iyi kontrollü Tip 1 diabetes mellituslu çocuklarda, pupil kontraksiyon amplitüdü değerleri benzer yaştaki sağlıklı olgulara göre anlamlı düzeyde düşüktür. Bu değişiklik, subklinik diyabetik otonom nöropati ile ilişkili olabilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Tip 1 diabetes mellitus; pupil
Objective: To investigate the static and dynamic pupillary responses of children with Type 1 diabetes mellitus and to compare these results with data obtained from healthy children. Material and Methods: This prospective study included well-controlled Type 1 diabetes mellitus children without retinopathy (diabetes mellitus group) and healthy children of similar age and gender (control group). Static and dynamic pupillary responses were performed using automatic, quantitative pupillometry device (MonPack One, Vision Monitor System, Metrovision, France). Scotopic, mesopic, low-photopic and high-photopic pupil diameters were recorded from static pupillometry measurements. Dynamic pupillometry measurements including resting diameter, amplitude of pupil contraction, latency of pupil contraction, duration of pupil contraction, velocity of pupil contraction, latency of pupil dilation, duration of pupil dilation, and velocity of pupil dilation were also recorded. Results: In this study, 83 eyes of 83 patients were examined: 43 cases were in diabetes mellitus group and 40 cases were in control group. There was no statistically significant difference between diabetes mellitus and control groups in terms of age and gender. The pupil diameters in scotopic, mesopic, low-photopic and high-photopic conditions were lower in diabetes mellitus group, than control group, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. Only amplitude of pupil contraction values among dynamic pupillometry measurements were found to be significantly lower in diabetes mellitus group compared to control group. Conclusion: In children with well-controlled Type 1 diabetes mellitus without retinopathy, amplitude of pupil contraction values are significantly lower than those of healthy children. This change may be associated with subclinical diabetic autonomic neuropathy.
Keywords: Type 1 diabetes mellitus; pupil
- Keskinbora HK. [The pupil]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Surg Med Sci. 2006;2(14):59-70.
- Işıkay CT. [Pupillary functions and disorders]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Neurol-Special Topics. 2011;4(1):48-55.
- Ozer A. [Diabetes and pupillary]. Ret-Vit Özel Sayı. 2014;22:179-84.
- Tesfaye S, Boulton AJ, Dyck PJ, Freeman R, Horowitz M, Kempler P, et al. Diabetic neuropathies: update on definitions, diagnostic criteria, estimation of severity, and treatments. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(10):2285-93. [Crossref ] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Vinik AI, Erbas T. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy: diagnosis and management. Curr Diab Rep. 2006;6(6):424-30. [Crossref ] [ PubMed]
- Pittasch D, Lobmann R, Behrens-Baumann W, Lehnert H. Pupil signs of sympathetic autonomic neuropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(9):1545-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ferrari GL, Marques JL, Gandhi RA, Emery CJ, Tesfaye S, Heller SR, et al. An approach to the assessment of diabetic neuropathy based on dynamic pupillometry. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:557-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tekin K, Sekeroglu MA, Kiziltoprak H, Doguizi S, Inanc M, Yilmazbas P. Static and dynamic pupillometry data of healthy individuals. Clin Exp Optom. 2018;101(5):659-65. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Schöder S, Chaschina E, Janunts E, Cayless A, Langenbucher A. Reproducibility and normal values of static pupil diameters. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28(2):150-6. [Crossref ] [PubMed]
- Zele AJ, Feigl B, Smith SS, Markwell EL. The circadian response of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. PLoS One. 2011;6(3): e17860. [Crossref ] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Mabed IS, Saad A, Guilbert E, Gatinel D. Measurement of pupil center shift in refractive surgery candidates with caucasian eyes using infrared pupillometry. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(10):694700. [Crossref ] [PubMed]
- Olgun G, Newey CR, Ardelt A. Pupillometry in brain death: differences in pupillary diameter between paediatric and adult subjects. Neurol Res. 2015;37(11):945-50. [Crossref ] [PubMed]
- Park JC, Moss HE, McAnany JJ. The pupillary light reflex in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(1):23-9. [PubMed]
- Dimitropoulos G, Tahrani AA, Stevens MJ. Cardiac autonomic neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes. 2014;5(1):1739. [Crossref ] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ferrari GL, Marques JL, Gandhi RA, Heller SR, Schneider FK, Tesfaye S, et al. Using dynamic pupillometry as a simple screening tool to detect autonomic neuropathy in patients with diabetes: a pilot study. Biomed Eng Online. 2010;9:26. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Yuan D, Spaeth EB, Vernino S, Muppidi S. Dis proportionate pupillary involvement in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Clin Auton Res. 2014;24(6):305-9. [Crossref ] [PubMed]
- Maguire AM, Craig ME, Craighead A, Chan AK, Cusumano JM, Hing SJ, et al. Autonomic nerve testing predicts the development of complications: a 12-year follow-up study. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(1):77-82. [Crossref ] [ PubMed]
- Park JC, Chen YF, Blair NP, Chau FY, Lim JI, Leiderman YI, et al. Pupillary responses in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44987. [Crossref ] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Jain M, Devan S, Jaisankar D, Swaminathan G, Pardhan S, Raman R. Pupillary abnormalities with varying severity of diabetic retinopathy. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):5636. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Feigl B, Zele AJ, Fader SM, Howes AN, Hughes CE, Jones KA, et al. The post-illumination pupil response of melanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in diabetes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(3):e230-4. [Crossref ] [PubMed]
- Ortube MC, Kiderman A, Eydelman Y, Yu F, Aguilar N, Nusinowitz S, et al. Comparative regional pupillography as a noninvasive biosensor screening method for diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(1):9-18. [Crossref ] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Karavanaki K, Davies AG, Hunt LP, Morgan MH, Baum JD. Pupil size in diabetes. Arch Dis Child. 1994;71(6):511-5. [Crossref ] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: Process List