Objective: Different mucoperiosteal flap designs are suggested throughout the extraction of the impacted lower third molar to decrease postoperative complications. The aim of the current study compare triangular flap and the envelope flap related to pain, trismus and edema on mandibular third molar extraction. Material and Methods: The present prospective split mouth study included 24 patients. Impacted third molar on one side of jaw was be extracted with a triangular flap, other side was be extracted with an envelope flap. In order to evaluate the edema and trismus, measurements were be made on the operation day, day 1, day 3 and day 7 with caliper. Patients marked on a 100 mm scale on the 1st, 3rd and 7th days after the operation to evaluate the pain and difficulty chewing in the postoperative period. Results: One of 24 patients were excluded from the study because vasovagal syncope developed during the procedure, and the study was completed with 23 patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the triangular and envelope flap groups in terms of edema and pain (p>0.05) (p>0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between 2 groups in terms of pain measurements and difficulty chewing on the 1st day, 3rd day, 7th days (p>0.05) (p>0.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, the current study observed that flap design had no effect on postoperative complications. According to the results of this study, flap design in the extraction of impacted wisdom teeth should be determined with the surgeon's preference.
Keywords: Impacted tooth; postoperative complications; morbidity
Amaç: Postoperatif komplikasyonları azaltmak için gömülü alt üçüncü azı dişinin çekimi sırasında farklı mukoperiosteal flep tasarımları önerilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, mandibular üçüncü molar diş çekiminde ağrı, trismus ve ödem ile ilişkili triangular flep ile zarf flebinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Mevcut prospektif split-mouth çalışmaya 24 hasta dâhil edildi. Çenenin bir tarafındaki gömülü üçüncü molar dişi triangular flep ile diğer tarafı ise zarf flebiyle çekilmiştir. Ödem ve trismusun değerlendirilmesi amacıyla operasyon günü, 1. gün, 3. gün ve 7. günde cetvel ile ölçümler yapıldı. Ameliyat sonrası dönemdeki ağrı ve çiğneme güçlüğünü değerlendirmek için hastalar ameliyat sonrası 1, 3 ve 7. günlerde 100 mm'lik bir ölçekte işaretlendi. Bulgular: İşlem sırasında vazovagal senkop gelişmesi nedeniyle 24 hastadan 1'i çalışmadan çıkarıldı ve çalışma 23 hasta ile tamamlandı. Triangular flep ve zarf flep grupları arasında ödem ve ağrı açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark yoktu (p>0,05) (p>0,05). 1. gün, 3. gün ve 7. gün ağrı ölçümleri ve çiğneme güçlüğü açısından 2 grup arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunamadı (p>0,05) (p>0,05). Sonuç: Sonuç olarak bu çalışmada, flep tasarımının postoperatif komplikasyonlar üzerinde hiçbir etkisinin olmadığı gözlemlendi. Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre gömülü 20 yaş dişlerin çekiminde, flep tasarımı cerrahın tercihine göre belirlenmelidir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Gömülü diş; postoperatif komplikasyonlar; morbidite
- Fonseca R, Frost D, Hersh E, Levin L. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Anaesthesia/Dentoalveolar Surgery/Office Management. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2001.
- Dolanmaz D, Esen A, Isik K, Candirli C. Effect of 2 flap designs on postoperative pain and swelling after impacted third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116(4):e244-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kirk DG, Liston PN, Tong DC, Love RM. Influence of two different flap designs on incidence of pain, swelling, trismus, and alveolar osteitis in the week following third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104(1):e1-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Baqain ZH, Al-Shafii A, Hamdan AA, Sawair FA. Flap design and mandibular third molar surgery: a split mouth randomized clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41(8):1020-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jakse N, Bankaoglu V, Wimmer G, Eskici A, Pertl C. Primary wound healing after lower third molar surgery: evaluation of 2 different flap designs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93(1):7-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Menziletoglu D, Guler AY, Basturk F, Isik BK, Erdur EA. Comparison of two different flap designs for bilateral impacted mandibular third molar surgery. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;121(4):368-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sandhu A, Sandhu S, Kaur T. Comparison of two different flap designs in the surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39(11):1091-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ku JK, Baik SH, Kim JY, Huh JK. Effect of a vertical incision on postoperative swelling after an impacted mandibular third molar extraction: two cases with split-mouth designed magnetic resonance imaging analysis. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;49(2):91-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Yurttutan ME, Sancak KT. The effect of kinesio taping with the web strip technique on pain, edema, and trismus after impacted mandibular third molar surgery. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23(9):1260-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kaplan V, Hasanoglu Erbasar GN, Cigerim L, Altay Turgut H, Cerit A. Effect of St. John's wort oil and olive oil on the postoperative complications after third molar surgery: randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(4):2429-38. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Atalay B, Güler N, Cabbar F, Şençift K. Mandibuler gömülü üçüncü molar dişlerin çekimi sonrası gelişen komplikasyonların insidansının ve hastaların yaşam kalitesinin belirlenmesi [Determination of incidence of complications and life quality after mandibular impacted third molar surgery]. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2014;48(1):31-46. [Link]
- Alqahtani NA, Khaleelahmed S, Desai F. Evaluation of two flap designs on the mandibular second molar after third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2017;21(2):317-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Chen YW, Lee CT, Hum L, Chuang SK. Effect of flap design on periodontal healing after impacted third molar extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46(3):363-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kleinheinz J, Büchter A, Kruse-Lösler B, Weingart D, Joos U. Incision design in implant dentistry based on vascularization of the mucosa. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(5):518-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Xie Q, Wei S, Zhou N, Huang X. Modified envelope flap, a novel incision design, can relieve complications after extraction of fully horizontal impacted mandibular third molar. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(2):718-22. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Suarez-Cunqueiro MM, Gutwald R, Reichman J, Otero-Cepeda XL, Schmelzeisen R. Marginal flap versus paramarginal flap in impacted third molar surgery: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;95(4):403-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Erdogan O, Tatlı U, Ustün Y, Damlar I. Influence of two different flap designs on the sequelae of mandibular third molar surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;15(3):147-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Torres-Lagares D, Serrera-Figallo MA, Romero-Ruíz MM, Infante-Cossío P, García-Calderón M, Gutiérrez-Pérez JL. Update on dry socket: a review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2005;10(1):81-5; 77-81. English, Spanish. [PubMed]
- Şimşek Kaya G, Yapıcı Yavuz G, Saruhan N. The influence of flap design on sequelae and quality of life following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A split-mouth randomised clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46(9):828-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Anisuzzaman MM, Alam MK, Afrin A. Comparative study between standard Ward's Incision and coma shaped incision and its postoperative outcome on impacted mandibular third molars extraction in Bangladeshi population. Pesqui. Bras. em Odontopediatria Clin. Integr. 2019;19:e4671. [Crossref]
- Jeong YK, Ku JK, Baik SH, You JS, Leem DH, Choi SK. Classification of postoperative edema based on the anatomic division with mandibular third molar extraction. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;43(1):4. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: Process List