Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of Pleth Variability Index (PVI) and distensibility of inferior vena cava (dIVC) in fluid responsiveness of patients with sepsis. Material and Methods: Forty patients over 18 years of age who underwent fluid replacement for sepsis in the intensive care unit were included in the study. In our study, the patients were divided into 2 groups as those who had less than 15% increase in cardiac output (CO), and those who had more than 15% increase in CO after fluid replacement (fluid responders and non-responders). Before fluid replacement, demographic data of the patients (age, weight, cause of sepsis, body surface area, SOFA score), vital parameters (systolic arterial pressure, diastolic arterial pressure, mean arterial pressue, heart rate) and measuredd values (maximum diameter of vena cava inferior, minimum diameter of vena cava inferior, central venous pressure, PVI, CO, and stroke volume) were recorded. After applying crystalloid in a dose of 10 mL/kg for 15 minutes, the recorded parameters were repeated at 15th minute. Results: When receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for dIVC, the area under the curve (AUC) was found to be 0.833 (0.739-0.926). The threshold value was found to be 17.52%, sensitivity was 77.5%, and specificity was 72.5%. When ROC analysis was performed for PVI, AUC was found to be 0.889 (0.817-0.962). The threshold value was found as 12.50%, sensitivity was 72.5%, and specificity was 92.5%. Conclusion: PVI was found to be more specific but less sensitive than dIVC. dIVC is less sensitive and less specific than central venous pressure. However, dIVC and PVI can give useful results in patients who have contraindication of an invasive technique.
Keywords: Sepsis; sıvı tedavisi; kardiyak output
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı Pleth Değişkenlik İndeksi (PVI) ve inferior vena kava distensibilitesinin (dIVC) sepsisli hastalarda sıvı yanıtını değerlendirmedeki duyarlılığını ve özgüllüğünü karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya, yoğun bakım ünitesindeki sepsis tanısı almış sıvı replasmanı uygulanacak 18 yaş üstü bireylerden 40 hasta dâhil edildi. Çalışmamızda hastalar, sıvı replasmanı sonrası 'kardiyak output'ta [cardiac output (CO)] %15'ten az ve %15'ten fazla artış olan (sıvıya cevap verenler ve vermeyenler) olarak 2'ye ayrıldı. Hastaların sıvı replasmanı öncesi demografik verileri (yaş, kilo, sepsis nedeni, vücut yüzey alanı, SOFA skoru), vital parametreleri (sistolik arter basıncı, diaystolik arter basıncı, ortlama arter basıncı, kalp atım hızı) ve ölçüm değerleri (vena cava inferior maksimum çapı, vena cava inferior minimum çapı, santral venöz basınç, PVI, CO, vuruş hacmi) kayıt edildi. Hastalara 15 dk boyunca 10 mL/kg kristaloid uygulandıktan sonra kayıt edilen parametreler tekrarlandı. Bulgular: dIVC için alıcı işletim karakteristiği [receiver operating characteristic (ROC)] analizi yapıldığında, eğri altında kalan alan [area under the curve (AUC)] 0,833 (0,739-0,926) bulunmuştur. Eşik değer %17,52 bulunmuş olup; duyarlılık %77,5, özgüllük %72,5 bulunmuştur. PVI için ROC analizi yapıldığında, AUC 0,889 (0,817-0,962) bulunmuştur. Eşik değer %12,50 bulunmuş olup; duyarlılık %72,5, özgüllük %92,5 bulunmuştur. Sonuç: PVI'nın, dIVC'den daha spesifik ancak daha az duyarlı olduğu bulundu. dIVC, santral venöz basınçtan daha az duyarlı ve daha az spesifik bulundu. Bununla birlikte dIVC ve PVI, invaziv bir teknik için kontrendikasyonu olan hastalarda faydalı sonuçlar verebilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Sepsis; fluid therapy; cardiac output
- Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008;134(1):172-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, Monnet X, Anguel N, Richard C, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(1):64-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Barbier C, Loubières Y, Schmit C, Hayon J, Ricôme JL, Jardin F, et al. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(9):1740-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Au SM, Vieillard-Baron A. Bedside echocardiography in critically ill patients: a true hemodynamic monitoring tool. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012;26(5):355-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Grocott MP, Dushianthan A, Hamilton MA, Mythen MG, Harrison D, Rowan K; Optimisation Systematic Review Steering Group. Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes after surgery: a Cochrane Systematic Review. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(4):535-48. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Benes J, Giglio M, Brienza N, Michard F. The effects of goal-directed fluid therapy based on dynamic parameters on post-surgical outcome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2014;18(5):584. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Şen G, Düger C, Avcı O, Gürsoy S, Kaygusuz K, Kol İÖ, et al. Total kalça cerrahisi operasyonunda non-invaziv PVI (Pleth Variability İndeks) monitörizasyonunun sıvı ve kan transfüzyonuna, intraoperatif hemodinami üzerine etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi [Investigation of the efficacy of PVI (Pleth Variability Indeks) monitorization on intraoperative fluid and blood transfusion, intraoperative hemodynamics in total hip surgeries]. Van Tıp Derg. 2018;25(2):138-45. [Crossref]
- Yüksek A. Utility of the Pleth Variability Index in predicting anesthesia-induced hypotension in geriatric patients. Turk J Med Sci. 2021;51(1):134-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- de Oliveira OH, Freitas FG, Ladeira RT, Fischer CH, Bafi AT, Azevedo LC, et al. Comparison between respiratory changes in the inferior vena cava diameter and pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in postoperative patients. J Crit Care. 2016;34:46-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Pişkin Ö, Öz İİ. Accuracy of pleth variability index compared with inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(47):e8889. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Moretti R, Pizzi B. Inferior vena cava distensibility as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2010;13(1):3-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kim J, Kim K, Lee H, Ahn S. Epidemiology of sepsis in Korea: a population-based study of incidence, mortality, cost and risk factors for death in sepsis. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2019;6(1):49-63. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Driessen RGH, van de Poll MCG, Mol MF, van Mook WNKA, Schnabel RM. The influence of a change in septic shock definitions on intensive care epidemiology and outcome: comparison of sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 definitions. Infect Dis (Lond). 2018;50(3):207-13. Erratum in: Infect Dis (Lond). 2018;50(3):245. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Adrie C, Alberti C, Chaix-Couturier C, Azoulay E, De Lassence A, Cohen Y, et al. Epidemiology and economic evaluation of severe sepsis in France: age, severity, infection site, and place of acquisition (community, hospital, or intensive care unit) as determinants of workload and cost. J Crit Care. 2005;20(1):46-58. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fleischmann C, Thomas-Rueddel DO, Hartmann M, Hartog CS, Welte T, Heublein S, et al. Hospital incidence and mortality rates of sepsis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016;113(10):159-66. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Opal SM, Girard TD, Ely EW. The immunopathogenesis of sepsis in elderly patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41 Suppl 7:S504-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Nasir N, Jamil B, Siddiqui S, Talat N, Khan FA, Hussain R. Mortality in sepsis and its relationship with gender. Pak J Med Sci. 2015;31(5):1201-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: Process List