Objective: To compare the ocular surface changes following Femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (Femto-LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Material and Methods: TThis prospective study included 74 eyes of 37 patients: 34 were in the Femto-LASIK group, and 40 were in the PRK group. Schirmer test, tear break-up time, and conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) were used to determine ocular surface changes before and 1 month, and 3 months after PRK or Femto-LASIK. Results: There were no significant differences between PRK and LASIK group in mean CIC scores in the first month (p > .05, for each). However, a significant difference observed at goblet cell density (GCD) at the third month between PRK and LASIK group (p =0.008). Comparing of the CIC scores between first month and the third month of PRK group showed significant improvements in the GCD and epithelial cell sheet (p =0.005, p =0.001, respectively). However, no significant changes occurred in the FemtoLASIK group between first month and the third month (p > .05, for each). Conclusion: We observed histopathological changes in the perilimbal conjunctiva in the PRK and LASIK groups at the first month after surgery. It was observed that these changes continued in the 3rd postoperative month. Although GCD improved significantly in the PRK group, it was still lower than preoperatively. We can say that these changes play a primary role in the pathogenesis of dry eye and even cause a more severe course of DED in LASIK patients.
Keywords: Conjunctival impression cytology; Femto-LASIK; PRK; Schirmer test; Tear break-up time
Amaç: emtosaniye lazer in situ keratomileusis (Femto-LASIK) ve fotorefraktif keratektomi (PRK) sonrası oküler yüzey değişikliklerini karşılaştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu prospektif çalışmaya Femto-LASIK grubunda 34, PRK grubunda 40 olmak üzere toplam 37 hastanın 74 gözü dahil edildi. PRK veya Femto-LASIK öncesi, 1. ay ve 3. aydaki oküler yüzey değişikliklerini belirlemek için Schirmer testi, gözyaşı kırılma zamanı ve konjonktival impresyon sitolojisi (KİS) kullanıldı. Bulgular: PRK ve LASIK grubu arasında, ortalama KİS skorlarında birinci ayda anlamlı fark yoktu (her biri için p > .05). Ancak üçüncü aydaki goblet hücre dansitesinde (GHD) PRK ve LASIK grubu arasında anlamlı bir fark gözlendi (p =0.008). PRK grubunun birinci ay ile üçüncü ay arasındaki KİS skorlarının karşılaştırılması, GHD ve epitel hücre tabakasında anlamlı iyileşmeler gösterdi (sırasıyla p = 0.005, p = 0.001). Ancak Femto-LASIK grubunda birinci ay ile üçüncü ay arasında anlamlı bir değişiklik olmadı (her biri için p >.05). Sonuç: Ameliyat sonrası 1. ayda PRK ve LASIK gruplarında perilimbal konjonktivada histopatolojik değişiklikler gözlemledik. Ameliyat sonrası 3. ayda bu değişikliklerin devam ettiği görüldü. GHD, PRK grubunda önemli ölçüde iyileşmesine rağmen, yine de preoperatif dönemden daha düşüktü. Bu değişikliklerin kuru göz patogenezinde birincil rol oynadığı ve hatta LASIK hastalarında kuru göz hastalığının daha ağır seyretmesine neden olduğu söylenebilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Konjonktival impresyon sitolojisi; Femto-LASIK; PRK; Schirmer testi; gözyaşı kırılma zamanı
- Shortt AJ, Allan BD, Evans JR. Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(1):CD005135. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sauvageot P, Julio G, Alvarez de Toledo J, Charoenrook V, Barraquer RI. Femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis versus photorefractive keratectomy: Effect on ocular surface condition. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(2):167-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Garcia-Zalisnak D, Nash D, Yeu E. Ocular surface diseases and corneal refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25(4):264-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Toda I. Dry eye after LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(14):DES109-DES115. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dohlman TH, Lai EC, Ciralsky JB. Dry eye disease after refractive surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2016;56(2):101-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rodriguez AE, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Hamdi IM, Galal A, Awadalla M, Alio JL. Comparison of goblet cell density after femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome in LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(6):2570-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ryan DS, Bower KS, Sia RK, Shatos MA, Howard RS, Mines MJ, et al. Goblet cell response after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(8):1181-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Nelson JD, Havener VR, Cameron JD. Cellulose acetate impressions of the ocular surface. Dry eye states. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101(12):1869-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Haller-Schober EM, Schwantzer G, Berghold A, Fischl M, Theisl A, Horwath-Winter J. Evaluating an impression cytology grading system (IC score) in patients with dry eye syndrome. Eye (Lond). 2006;20(8):927-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Nelson JD, Craig JP, Akpek EK, Azar DT, Belmonte C, Bron AJ, et al. TFOS DEWS II Introduction. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):269-75. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yu EY, Leung A, Rao S, Lam DS. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on tear stability. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(12):2131-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- De Paiva CS, Chen Z, Koch DD, Hamill MB, Manuel FK, Hassan SS, et al. The incidence and risk factors for developing dry eye after myopic LASIK. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(3):438-45. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Denoyer A, Landman E, Trinh L, Faure JF, Auclin F, Baudouin C. Dry eye disease after refractive surgery: comparative outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(4):669-76. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Stephenson CG, Gartry DS, O'Brart DP, Kerr-Muir MG, Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy. A 6-year follow-up study. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(2):273-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rajan MS, Jaycock P, O'Brart D, Nystrom HH, Marshall J. A long-term study of photorefractive keratectomy; 12-year follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(10):1813-24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Linna TU, Vesaluoma MH, Pérez-Santonja JJ, Petroll WM, Alió JL, Tervo TM. Effect of myopic LASIK on corneal sensitivity and morphology of subbasal nerves. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(2):393-7. [PubMed]
- Donnenfeld ED, Ehrenhaus M, Solomon R, Mazurek J, Rozell JC, Perry HD. Effect of hinge width on corneal sensation and dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(4):790-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Albietz JM, Lenton LM, McLennan SG. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia on tear film and ocular surface. J Refract Surg. 2002;18(2):113-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Albietz JM, McLennan SG, Lenton LM. Ocular surface management of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2003;19(6):636-44. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Boira Cabre MM, Duch Mestres F, Tresserra F. Citología de impresión y LASIK [Impression cytology and LASIK]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2003;78(10):555-9. Spanish. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ozdamar A, Aras C, Karakas N, Sener B, Karacorlu M. Changes in tear flow and tear film stability after photorefractive keratectomy. Cornea. 1999;18(4):437-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Siganos DS, Popescu CN, Siganos CS, Pistola G. Tear secretion following spherical and astigmatic excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(11):1585-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lee JB, Ryu CH, Kim J, Kim EK, Kim HB. Comparison of tear secretion and tear film instability after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(9):1326-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Konomi K, Chen LL, Tarko RS, Scally A, Schaumberg DA, Azar D, et al. Preoperative characteristics and a potential mechanism of chronic dry eye after LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(1):168-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Shin SY, Lee YJ. Conjunctival changes induced by LASIK suction ring in a rabbit model. Ophthalmic Res. 2006;38(6):343-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Salomão MQ, Ambrósio R Jr, Wilson SE. Dry eye associated with laser in situ keratomileusis: Mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(10):1756-60. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Barequet IS, Hirsh A, Levinger S. Effect of thin femtosecond LASIK flaps on corneal sensitivity and tear function. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(9):897-902. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List