Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, çocuk diş hekimliğinde çürük temizleme işlemlerinde kullanılan döner aletler ile karşılaştırıldığında Er,Cr:YSGG lazerin çocuk hastalarda kabul edilebilirliğinin değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya, yaşları 9-12 arasında değişen 20 çocuk hastadan, 40 adet alt daimi 1. azı diş dâhil edildi. Dişler, uygulanan çürük temizleme yöntemlerine göre 2 gruba ayrıldı: Döner aletler (rotary grup) ve Er,Cr:YSGG lazer (lazer grup) grubu. Tedavi sırasında oluşan ağrı ve kaygının değerlendirilmesi için Çocuk Korku Değerlendirme Skalası-Dental Alt Ölçeği [Children Fear Survey Schedule Dental Subscale (CFSS-DS)] ve Görsel Analog Skala [Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)] kullanıldı. Ayrıca ağrı ve konfor, Yüz, Bacaklar, Hareket, Ağlama, Avutabilme Davranışsal Skalası [Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC)] ile değerlendirildi. Kavite preperasyon süreleri kaydedildi. Tedavilerin sonrasında hastaların lazer veya döner aletlerden ne kadar rahatsız olduklarını belirlemek için titreşim, koku, tat, ses ve görme gibi subjektif parametreleri değerlendiren bir anket uygulandı. Bulgular: Lazer ve rotary grubu karşılaştırıldığında; çürük temizleme işlem süresinin lazer grubuna kıyasla rotary grubunda daha kısa olduğu bulundu. CFSS-DS, VAS ve FLACC skorları, rotary grubunda lazer grubundan daha yüksekti. Lazer grubunda hastala¬rın %40'ı koku parametresi için 'çok rahatsız etti' cevabını verirken, tat parametresi için %40'ı 'rahatsız etti' cevabını verdi. Görüntü parametresi için lazer grubunda hastaların %80'i, rotary grubunda ise hastaların %90'ı 'hiç rahatsız etmedi' cevabını verdi. Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sınırlılıkları dâhilinde; dental lazer anksiyete seviyesi yüksek çocuk hastalarda çürük temizleme işlemlerinde bir tedavi alternatifi olabilir. Döner aletlerle karşılaştırıldığında, lazerle kavite temizlenmesinin objektif parametreler kullanarak kabul edilebilirliğini değerlendirmek için büyük örneklem sayısına sahip ileri çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Çocuk diş hekimliği; lazer tedavileri; çürük temizleme; subjektif kabul edilebilirlik
Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the acceptance of Er, Cr: YSGG laser compared with rotary instruments used for caries removal procedures in pediatric patients. Material and Methods: 40 first permanent lower molars from 20 pediatric patients between ages of 9-12 were included in the study. The teeth were separated into 2 group according to cavity preparation type; rotary instruments (rotary group) and Er,Cr:YSGG laser (laser group). Children Fear Survey Schedule Dental Subscale (CFSS-DS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate pain and anxiety during the cavity preparation. The pain and comfort were also evaluated with Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale. The cavity preparations time were recorded. After the caries removal, the patients asked a questionnaire to determine subjective parameters such as vibration, smell, taste, sound, and sight how comfortable they were with laser or rotary instruments. Results: When the laser and rotary groups are compared; it was found that the treatment time was shorter in the rotary group than laser group. CFSS-DS, VAS and FLACC scores were higher in rotary group. While 40% of the patients answered 'very uncomfortable' for the smell parameter; 40% of patients answered 'uncomfortable' for the taste parameter in laser group. For the sight parameter, 80% answered 'very comfortable' in laser group and 90% answered 'very comfortable' in the rotary group. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, dental laser could be a treatment alternative for caries removal in anxious pediatric patients. Further studies with large sample size are needed to determine the acceptability using objective parameters for cavity preparation with laser compared to rotary instruments.
Keywords: Pediatric dentistry; laser therapy; caries removal; subjective acceptance
- Alvesalo I, Murtomaa H, Milgrom P, Honkanen A, Karjalainen M, Tay KM. The dental fear survey schedule: a study with finnish children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1993;3(4):193-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- de Menezes Abreu DM, Leal SC, Mulder J, Frencken JE. Patterns of dental anxiety in children after sequen-tial dental visits. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2011;12(6):298-302. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Armfield JM. Towards a better understanding of dental anxiety and fear: cognitions vs. experiences. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118(3):259-64. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Raj S, Agarwai M, Aradhya K, Konde S, Nagakishore V. Evaluation of dental fear in children during dental visit using children's fear survey schedule-dental subscale. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;6(1):12-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Eitner S, Wichmann M, Paulsen A, Holst S. Dental anxiety--an epidemiological study on its clinical correlation and effects on oral health. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33(8):588-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Genovese MD, Olivi G. Laser inpaediatric dentistry: patient acceptance of hard and soft tissue therapy. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2008;9(1):13-7. [PubMed]
- Visuri SR, Walsh Jr JT, Wigdor HA. Erbium laser ablation of dental hard tissue: effect of water cooling. Laser Surg Med. 1996,18(3):294-300. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sarmadi R, Hedman E, Gabre P. Laser in caries treatment--patients' experiences and opinions. Int J Dent Hyg. 2014;12(1):67-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Belcheva A, Shindova M. Subjective acceptance of pediatric patients during cavity preparation with Er: YAG laser and conventional rotary instruments. IMAB. 2014;20(5):631-3. [Crossref]
- Korkut E, Gezgin O, Özer H, Sener Y. Evaluation of Er:YAG lasers on pain perception in pediatric patients during caries removal: a split- mouth study. Acta Odontologica Turcica. 2018;35(3):81-6. [Crossref]
- Eren F, Altinok B, Ertugral F, Tanboga I. The effect of erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) laser therapy on pain during cavity preparation in paediatric dental patients: a pilot study. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2013;12(2):80-4. [PubMed]
- Matsumoto K, Hossain M, Hossain MI, Kawano H, Kimura Y. Clinical assessment of Er, Cr: YSGG laser application for cavity preparation. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2002;20(1):17-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dogan MC, Seydaoglu G, Uguz S, Inanc By. The effect of age, gender and socio-economic factors on perceived dental anxiety determined by a modified scale in children. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2006;4(4):235-41. [PubMed]
- Walsh LJ. Anxiety prevention: implementing the 4S principle in conservative dentistry. Auxilliary. 2007;17(5):24-6. [Link]
- Matsumoto K, Wang X, Zhang C, Kinoshita J. Effect of a novel Er:YAG laser in caries removal and cavity preparation: a clinical observation. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007;25(1):8-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Liu JF, Lai YL, Shu WY, Lee SY. Acceptance and efficiency of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation in children. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006;24(4):489-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Aoki A, Ishikawa I, Yamada T, Otsuki M, Watanabe H, Tagami J, et al. Comparison between Er:YAG laser and conventional technique for root caries treatment in vitro. J Dent Res. 1998;77(6):1404-14. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Celiberti P, Francescut P, Lussi A. Performance of four dentine excavation methods in deciduous teeth. Caries Res. 2006.40(2):117-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Keller U, Hibst R, Geurtsen W, Schilke R, Heidemann D, Klaiber B, et al. Erbium:YAG laser application in caries therapy. Evaluation of patient perception and acceptance. J Dent. 1998;26(8):649-56. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- DenBesten PK, White JM, Pelino JE, Furnish G, Silveira A, Parkins FM. The safety and effectiveness of an Er: YAG laser for caries removal and cavity preparation in children. Med Laser Appl. 2001;16(3):215-22. [Crossref]
- Evans DJ, Matthews S, Pitts NB, Longbottom C, Nugent ZJ. Restorative dentistry: a clinical evaluation of an Erbium: YAG laser for dental cavity preparation. Br Dent J. 2000;188(12):677-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Muppa R, Bhupatiraju P, Duddu M, Penumatsa NV, Dandempally A, Panthula P. Comparison of anxiety levels associated with noise in the dental clinic among children of age group 6-15 years. Noise Health. 2013;15(64):190-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Olivi G, Genovese MD. Laser restorative dentistry in children and adolescents. Eur Arch of Paediatr Dent. 2011;12(2):68-78. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kornblit R, Trapani D, Bossù M, Muller-Bolla M, Rocca JP, Polimeni A. The use of Erbium:YAG laser for caries removal in paediatric patients following Minimally Invasive Dentistry concepts. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2008;9(2):81-7. [PubMed]
- Kato J, Moriya K, Jayawardena JA, Wijeyeweera RL. Clinical application of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation in children. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2003;21(3):151-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Johar S, Goswami M, Kumar G, Dhillon JK. Caries removal by Er, Cr: YSGG laser and air-rotor handpiece comparison in primary teeth treatment: an in vivo study. Laser Ther. 2019;28(2):116-22. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Zhang S, Chen T, Ge LH. [Evaluation of clinical outcomes for Er: YAG laser application in caries therapy of children]. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2013,45(1):87-91. [PubMed]
- Bohari MR, Chunawalla YK, Ahmed BMN. Clinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional, chemomechanical and laser technique: an in vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13(1):40-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List