Amaç: Bruksizm diş sıkma ve/veya diş gıcırdatma ile karakterize bir parafonksiyonel alışkanlıktır. Bruksizm uyku sırasında veya uyanıkken ortaya çıkabilir. Erişkin popülasyonda yaygın olarak karşılaştığımız için klinik açıdan önemli bir olgudur. Bruksizmin nedenleri hakkındaki görüşler çok sayıda ve çok çeşitlidir. Malokluzyon, uyku bozuklukları, sempatik veya parasempatik sinir sistemi aktivasyonu, alkol, tütün, ilaç, parafonksiyonel alışkanlıklar, temporomandibular eklem bozuklukları, yüksek anksiyete düzeyi, psikiyatrik bozukluklar ve stres olası etiyolojik faktörler arasında sayılmaktadır. Bruksizmin sonuçlarında ise diş aşınması, ağrı gibi etkiler dışında diş hareketi, ağız yumuşak dokuları ve çene kemiğinde yaptığı değişiklikler de yer alabilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, bruksizmin çiğneme kaslarının tutunma yeri olan mandibula antegonial ve gonial bölgelerindeki etkilerini panoramik radyografik görüntüler kullanarak değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmamıza 106'sında bruksizm olan; 132'sinde bruksizm olmayan toplam 238 kişi dâhil edildi. Panoramik radyogramlarda Image J programı kullanılarak mandibula sağ ve solda gonial açı, antegonial açı ve antegonial derinlik ölçüldü. Ayrıca gonial bölgede kemik apozisyonu varlığı değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Gonial açı, antegonial açı kadınlarda daha yüksekken; antegonial derinlik erkeklerde yüksekti. Gonial bölgede ekzostoz varlığı erkeklerde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derece daha fazlaydı. Bruksizmi olan gruptaki antegonial derinlik ölçümlerinin bruksizmi olmayan gruba göre anlamlı düzeyde daha düşük olduğu görüldü. Bruksizmi olan ve olmayan bireyler arasında gonial bölgede kemik apozisyonu açısından anlamlı bir farlılık bulunmadı. Sonuç: Çalışmamız, alt çenede bruksizme göre bir yeniden şekillenme olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu yeniden şekillenme bölgeye özgü görülmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Antegonial açı; antegonial derinlik; bruksizm; gonial açı; panoramik radyograf
Objective: Bruxism is a parafunctional habit characterized by clenching and/or grinding the teeth. Bruxism can occur during sleep or while awake. It is a clinically important phenomenon because we commonly encounter it in the adult population. Opinions about the causes of bruxism are many and varied. Malocclusion, sleep disorders, sympathetic or parasympathetic nervous system activation, alcohol, tobacco, medication, parafunctional habits, temporomandibular joint disorders, high anxiety level, psychiatric disorders and stress are among the possible etiological factors. The consequences of bruxism, in addition to effects such as tooth wear and pain, may also include changes in tooth movement, oral soft tissues and jaw bone. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of bruxism on the antegonial and gonial regions of the mandible, which are the attachment points of the chewing muscles, using panoramic radiographic images. Material and Methods: A total of 238 people, 106 of whom had bruxism and 132 of whom did not have bruxism, were included in our study. In panoramic radiograms, gonial angle, antegonial angle and antegonial depth were measured on the right and left sides of the mandible using the Image J program. Additionally, the presence of bone apposition in the gonial region was evaluated. Results: While gonial angle and antegonial angle were higher in women; antegonial depth was higher in males. The presence of exostosis in the gonial region was statistically significantly higher in men. It was observed that the antegonial depth measurements in the group with bruxism were significantly lower than in the group without bruxism. There was no significant difference in bone apposition in the gonial region between individuals with and without bruxism. Conclusion: This study shows that there is a remodeling in the lower jaw according to bruxism. This reshaping appears to be specific to the region.
Keywords: Antagonial angle; antagonial depth; bruxism; gonial angle; panoramic radiograph
- Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Raphael KG, Wetselaar P, Glaros AG, Kato T, et al. International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45(11):837-44. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Jensen R, Rasmussen BK, Pedersen B, Lous I, Olesen J. Prevalence of oromandibular dysfunction in a general population. J Orofac Pain. 1993;7(2):175-82. [PubMed]
- Fernandes G, Franco AL, Siqueira JT, Gonçalves DA, Camparis CM. Sleep bruxism increases the risk for painful temporomandibular disorder, depression and non-specific physical symptoms. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(7):538-44. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ferreira-Bacci Ado V, Cardoso CL, Díaz-Serrano KV. Behavioral problems and emotional stress in children with bruxism. Braz Dent J. 2012;23(3):246-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Feu D, Catharino F, Quintão CC, Almeida MA. A systematic review of etiological and risk factors associated with bruxism. J Orthod. 2013;40(2):163-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Misch CE. The effect of bruxism on treatment planning for dental implants. Dent Today. 2002;21(9):76-81. [PubMed]
- Gulec M, Tassoker M, Ozcan S, Orhan K. Evaluation of the mandibular trabecular bone in patients with bruxism using fractal analysis. Oral Radiol. 2021;37(1):36-45. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dutra V, Yang J, Devlin H, Susin C. Mandibular bone remodelling in adults: evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33(5):323-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Devlin H, Ferguson M. Aging and the orofacial tissues. In: Tallis R, Fillit H, eds. Brocklehurst's Textbook of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology. 5th ed. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2003. p.951-64.
- Ohm E, Silness J. Size of the mandibular jaw angle related to age, tooth retention and gender. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26(11):883-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Casey DM, Emrich LJ. Changes in the mandibular angle in the edentulous state. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59(3):373-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Isman O. Evaluation of jaw bone density and morphology in bruxers using panoramic radiography. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(2):676-81. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Unal Erzurumlu Z, Sadik E, Gokkurt BN, Ozbey F, Erzurumlu K, Kasko Arici Y. Morphological evaluation of gonial and antegonial regions in bruxers on panoramic radiographic images. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):457. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Chole RH, Patil RN, Balsaraf Chole S, Gondivkar S, Gadbail AR, Yuwanati MB. Association of mandible anatomy with age, gender, and dental status: a radiographic study. ISRN Radiol. 2013;2013:453763. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Glaros AG, Rao SM. Effects of bruxism: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1977;38(2):149-57. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Montoya-Sanhueza G, Chinsamy A. Long bone histology of the subterranean rodent Bathyergus suillus (Bathyergidae): ontogenetic pattern of cortical bone thickening. J Anat. 2017;230(2):203-33. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Choi JW. Assessment of panoramic radiography as a national oral examination tool: review of the literature. Imaging Sci Dent. 2011;41(1):1-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Govindraju P, Kumar TM, Chandra P, Balaji P, Sowbhagya M. Panoramic radiomorphometric indices of mandible: biomarker for osteoporosis. In: Preedy V, ed. Biomarkers in Bone Disease. Biomarkers in Disease: Methods, Discoveries and Applications. 1st ed. Dordrecht: Springer; 2015. p.1-23. [Crossref]
- Tercanli Alkis H, Turker N. Retrospective evaluation of marginal bone loss around implants in a mandibular locator-retained denture using panoramic radiographic images and finite element analysis: A pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(6):1199-205. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Vazquez L, Nizamaldin Y, Combescure C, Nedir R, Bischof M, Dohan Ehrenfest DM, et al. Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(2):20110429. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Sarifah N, Hamdani R, Nurrahman T. Mandibular quality assessment in women aged 40-60 years using mandibular cortical index and antegonial index on panoramic radiographs. JRDI. 2022;6:95-100. [Crossref]
- Kiliaridis S. Masticatory muscle influence on craniofacial growth. Acta Odontol Scand. 1995;53(3):196-202. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Odman A, Mavropoulos A, Kiliaridis S. Do masticatory functional changes influence the mandibular morphology in adult rats. Arch Oral Biol. 2008;53(12):1149-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Padmaja Satheeswarakumar L, Elenjickal TJ, Ram SKM, Thangasamy K. Assessment of mandibular surface area changes in bruxers versus controls on panoramic radiographic images: a case control study. Open Dent J. 2018;12:753-61. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ghosh S, Vengal M, Pai KM, Abhishek K. Remodeling of the antegonial angle region in the human mandible: a panoramic radiographic cross-sectional study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15(5):e802-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Inoue M, Ono T, Kameo Y, Sasaki F, Ono T, Adachi T, et al. Forceful mastication activates osteocytes and builds a stout jawbone. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4404. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Aufa AA, Rikmasari R, Wulansari D. Differences in mandibular morphology between bruxism and non-bruxism patients based on the Levandoski analysis. Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia. 2023;8(3):161-8. [Crossref]
- Rahmi E, Rikmasari R, Soemarsongko T. The bone remodeling of mandible in bruxers. Int J Med Health Sci. 2017;19(10):515-8. [Link]
- Serafim I, Rode S, Lopes S, Oliveira W, Pinho S, Silva E, et al. Impact of bruxism on craniomandibular morphology: a cone-beam computed tomographic study. Cranio. 2022:1-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Türp JC, Simonek M, Dagassan D. Bone apposition at the mandibular angles as a radiological sign of bruxism: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):537. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Casazza E, Ballester B, Philip-Alliez C, Raskin A. Evaluation of mandibular bone density in bruxers: the value of panoramic radiographs. Oral Radiol. 2023;39(1):117-24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cianferotti L, Brandi ML. Muscle-bone interactions: basic and clinical aspects. Endocrine. 2014;45(2):165-77. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yilmaz S, Kurt MH, Durmaz Yilmaz OM, Karahan S, Canger EM. A new perspective for radiologic findings of bruxism on dental panoramic radiography. Oral Radiol. 2023;39(3):544-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Huumonen S, Sipilä K, Haikola B, Tapio M, Söderholm AL, Remes-Lyly T, et al. Influence of edentulousness on gonial angle, ramus and condylar height. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(1):34-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fish SF. Change in the gonial angle. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1979;6(3):219-27. [Crossref]
.: Process List