Objective: The purpose of this study is to present a holistic analysis of published items in Ophthalmic Epidemiology Journal (OEJ). Material and Methods: The data used in this study were obtained from the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection. WoS enabled the extensive details of documents published in OEJ between 2002-2019 including countries, institutions, authors, citations and keywords. Scientometric network maps of keywords and country and institution co-authorships were created. Country contributions to the OEJ were shown on a graphic. Results: The search query revealed a total of 991 documents. Most of the documents were original articles (90.11%). The peak year when the maximum number of the documents (86) and total number of citations (1687) occurred was 2018. The hindex of the literature published in OEJ was 49. The average citations per item was 13.9. USA was the leading country by producing 40.42% of all documents followed by UK, Australia, India and China. The London University was the most contributing institution (5.25%) followed by London School of Hygiene Tropical Medicine and Johns Hopkins University. The most used keywords were 'Acuity', 'Survey' and 'Child'. Conclusion: Beneficial information about dynamic and trending search topics in ophthalmic epidemiology field may be obtained by this study.
Keywords: Bibliometrics; medical informatics; ophthalmology
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı Oftalmik Epidemiyoloji Dergisi'nde (OED) yayınlanan makalelerin bütüncül bir analizini sunmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada kullanılan veriler Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanından elde edilmiştir. WoS kullanarak 2002-2019 yılları arasında OED'de yayınlanan belgelerin ülkeler, kurumlar, yazarlar, alıntılar ve anahtar kelimeler dahil olmak üzere kapsamlı ayrıntıları elde edilmiştir. Anahtar kelimelerin, ülke ve kurumlar ile ortak yazarlıklarının bilimsel ağ haritaları oluşturuldu. OED'ye ülke katkıları bir grafikte gösterildi.Bulgular: Arama sorgusunda toplam 991 belge bulundu. Belgelerin çoğu orijinal makalelerdi (%90.11). Maksimum belge sayısı (86) ile toplam atıf sayısının (1687) gerçekleştiği yıl 2018 idi. OED'de yayınlanan literatürün h-endeksi 49'du. Makale başına ortalama alıntı 13.9'du. Tüm makalelerin %40.42'sini Amerika Birleşik Devletleri kaynaklı iken, onu sırayla İngiltere, Avustralya, Hindistan ve Çin takip etmişti. Londra Üniversitesi en çok katkıda bulunan kurum olurken (%5.25) onu Londra Hijyen Tropikal (Hygiene Tropical) Tıp Okulu ve Johns Hopkins Üniversitesi izledi. En çok kullanılan anahtar kelimeler "Keskinlik", "Anket" ve "Çocuk" idi. Sonuç: Bu çalışma ile oftalmik epidemiyoloji alanındaki dinamik ve yükselen değerdeki arama konuları hakkında faydalı bilgiler elde edilebilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Bibliyometri; tıbbi bilgi; oftalmoloji
- Hood WW, Wilson CS. The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics. 2001;52(2):291-314.[Crossref]
- Şenel E. Health and ancient beliefs: a scientometric analysis of health literature related to shamanism, paganism and spirituality. J Relig Health. 2019;58(6):2019-35.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Vijayakumar P, Sivasubramaniyan G, Rao MS. Bibliometric analysis of Indian journal of nuclear medicine. 2019;9(1):122-7.
- Kendall SJ. LibGuides: PubMed, Web of Science, or Google Scholar? A behind-the-scenes guide for life scientists.: So which is better: PubMed, Web of Science, or Google Scholar. 2016:05-2.
- GunnMap. GunnMap 2. [Available from: http://lert.co.nz/map/
- Vosviewer. VOSviewer - Visualizing scientific landscapes. Available from: http://www.vosviewer.com/
- Stead S. Epidemiology in ophthalmology. Can J Ophthalmol. 1980;15(1):2-3.[PubMed]
- Wilson MR. Epidemiology in ophthalmology. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(9):1374-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Broadus RN. Toward a definition of "bibliometrics". Scientometrics. 1987;12(5-6):373-9.[Crossref]
- Liu L, Li Y, Zhang GS, Wu JY, Majithia S, Tham YC, et al. Top 100 cited articles in ophthalmic epidemiology between 2006 and 2016. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;18;11(12):1994-8.[PubMed]
- Fan JC, McGhee CNJ. Citation analysis of the most influential authors and ophthalmology journals in the field of cataract and corneal refractive surgery 2000-2004. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;36(1):54-61.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Boudry C, Baudouin C, Mouriaux F. International publication trends in dry eye disease research: a bibliometric analysis. Ocul Surf. 2018;16(1):173-9.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Schoonbaert D, Roelants G. Impact takes precedence over interest. Nature. 1998;15;391(6664):222. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rezaei L, Mohammadi M. Scientometric analysis of Iranian scientific productions in the field of Ophthalmology. Journal of Clinical and Basic Research. 2018;2(4):23-32.[Crossref]
- Gershoni A, Vainer I, Reitblat O, Mimouni FB, Livny E, Blumenthal EZ, et al. Research productivity across different ophthalmic subspecialties in the United States. BMC Health Services Research. 2019;19(1):1-9.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Dai W, Tham YC, Chee ML, Majithia S, Poh S, Tan AG, et al. Systemic medications and cortical cataract: the Singapore epidemiology of eye diseases study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(3):330-5.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tao Y, Tham YC, Chee ML, Majithia S, Thakur S, Soh ZD, et al. Profile of retinal nerve fibre layer symmetry in a multiethnic Asian population: the Singapore epidemiology of eye diseases study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(6):836-41.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tham YC, Chee ML, Dai W, Lim ZW, Majithia S, Siantar R, et al. Profiles of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in a multi-ethnic Asian population: the Singapore epidemiology of eye diseases study. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(8):1064-76. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List