Amaç: Badminton sporuna özgü çeviklik testleri ile ilgili yapılan araştırmalarda, testlerin geçerlik ve güvenirlikleri veya antrenmanla meydana gelen değişimler sıklıkla araştırılmıştır. Ancak hangi test bataryasının, sahada uygulanması açısından daha etkili olabileceği konusu tam olarak bilinmemektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, badmintona özgü çeviklik testlerinin, etki büyüklüklerinin incelenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Araştırmaya, 18-25 yaş aralığında 35 erkek gönüllü katılmıştır. Deney grubunu (yaş: 21,3±1,82 yıl; boy uzunluğu: 177,3±5,87 cm; vücut ağırlığı: 69±6,21 kg), ortalama 6,1 yıl antrenman geçmişine sahip ve düzenli olarak müsabakalara katılan 19 erkek badmintoncu oluşturmuştur. Kontrol grubu (yaş: 20,8±1,2 yıl; boy uzunluğu: 172,3±6,93 cm; vücut ağırlığı: 71,5±4,77 kg) ise herhangi bir spor geçmişi olmayan ve düzenli egzersiz yapmayan 16 katılımcıdan oluşturulmuştur. İlk olarak deney grubuna, 3 haftalık adaptasyon antrenman programı uygulanmıştır. Ardından tüm grupların antropometrik özellikleri ve genel çeviklik testi ölçümleri (t-testi) gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ayrıca deney grubuna badmintona özgü 'Walklate', 'Four corner' ve 'Sideways' çeviklik testleri uygulanmıştır. Testler sonrasında 6 hafta boyunca, haftada 3 birim olmak üzere ~30 dk çeviklik antrenman modülü uygulamaları gerçekleştirilerek, aynı test ölçümleri tekrar edilmiştir. Elde edilen verilerin, varyans homojenitesi Levene Testi ile belirlenmiş ve normal dağılıma uygun olup olmadığını değerlendirmek için ise Shapiro-Wilks testi uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen ön-test ve sontest değerleri arasındaki farklılıkların belirlenmesi için 'Sample Paired t-test', etki büyüklüklerinin belirlenmesi için 'Cohen d size effect' formülü kullanıldı. Bulgular: Badmintona özgü çeviklik testlerinin öntest ve son-test bulguları arasında anlamlı bir farklılık bulundu (p<0,01). Testlerin etki büyüklükleri, Sideways 1,46, Four corner 1,25 ve Walklate testi 0,70 olarak tespit edildi. Sonuç: Çalışma bulguları, badmintona özgü çeviklik antrenmanlarında Sideways çeviklik testinin antrenman modülü ve test bataryası olarak kullanılmasının, performans gelişimi ve takibi açısından daha etkili olacağını göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Badminton; çeviklik antrenmanı; yön değiştirme; etki büyüklüğü
Objective: In studies on agility tests specific to badminton sports, the validity and reliability of the tests or the changes that occur with training have been frequently investigated. However, it is not known exactly which test battery would be more effective in terms of its application in the field. The aim of this study is to examine the effect sizes of agility tests specific to badminton. Material and Methods: 35 male volunteers between the ages of 18-25 participated in the study. The experimental group (age: 21.3±1.82 years; height: 177.3±5.87 cm; weight: 69±6.21 kg) consisted of 19 male badminton players with an average training history of 6.1 years and regularly participating in the competitions. The control group (age: 20.8±1.2 yrs; height: 172.3±6.93 cm; weight: 71.5±4.77 kg) consisted of 16 participants who did not have any sports background and did not exercise regularly. Firstly, 3- week adaptation training program was applied to the experimental group. Then, the anthropometric characteristics and general agility test measurements (t-test) of all groups were carried out. In addition, agility tests specific to badminton Walklate, Four corner and Sideways were applied to the experimental group. After the tests, agility training modules were applied for ~ 30 minutes, 3 units per week, for 6 weeks and the same test measurements were repeated. The "Sample Paired t-test" formula was used to determine the differences between the obtained pre-test and post-test values, and the formula "Cohen d size effect" was used to determine the effect sizes. Results: A significant difference was found between pre-test and post-test findings of badminton-specific agility tests (p<0.01). The effect sizes of the tests were determined as Sideways 1.46, Four corner 1.25 and Walklate test 0.70. Conclusion: The study findings show that using the sideways agility test as a training module and test battery in agility training specific to badminton will be more effective in terms of performance development and tracking.
Keywords: Badminton; agility training; change of direction; effect size
- Hussain I, Arshad BM. Kinematic alanalysis of forehand and backhand smash in badminton. Innov Syst Des Eng. 2011;2(7):20-6. [Link]
- Todd MK, Mahoney CA. Determination of pre-season physiological characteristics of elite male squash players. T. Reilly, M. Hughes, A. Lees eds. Science and Racket Sports. 1st. London and New York: Taylor&Francis Group; 1995. p. 81-88. [Link]
- Phomsoupha M, Laffaye G. The science of badminton: game characteristics, anthropometry, physiology, visual fitness and biomechanics. Sports Med. 2015;45(4):473-95. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ooi CH, Tan A, Ahmad A, Kwong KW, Sompong R, Ghazali KA, et al. Physiological characteristics of elite and sub-elite badminton players. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(14):1591-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chen B, Mok D, Lee WC, Lam WK. High-intensity stepwise conditioning programme for improved exercise responses and agility performance of a badminton player with knee pain. Phys Ther Sport. 2015;16(1):80-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Middleton G, Bishop DC, Smith C, Gee TI. The Implementation of a Sports-Specific Resistance and Plyometric Training Programme for an Elite Junior Badminton Player. School of Sport and Exercise Science. 2013. [Link]
- Walklate BM, O'Brien BJ, Paton CD, Young W. Supplementing regular training with short-duration sprint-agility training leads to a substantial increase in repeated sprint-agility performance with national level badminton players. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(5):1477-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Madsen CM, Karlsen A, Nybo L. Novel speed test for evaluation of badminton-specific movements. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(5):1203-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hagemann N, Memmert D. Coaching anticipatory skill in badminton laboratory versus field based perceptual training. J Hum Mov Stud. 2006;50:381-98. [Link]
- Kuo KP, Tsai HH, Lin CY, Wu WT. Verification and Evaluation of a Visual Reaction System for Badminton Training. Sensors. 2020;20(23):6808. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Trappe S.W, Pearson DR. Effects of Weight Assisted Dry-Land Strength Training on Swimming Performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 1994;8(4):209-213. [Crossref]
- Wilson DB, Lipsey MW. The role of method in treatment effectiveness research: evidence from meta-analysis. Psychol Methods. 2001;6(4):413-29. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Young WB, McDowell MH, Scarlett BJ. Specificity of sprint and agility training methods. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(3):315-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Faude O, Meyer T, Rosenberger F, Fries M, Huber G, Kindermann W. Physiological characteristics of badminton match play. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;100(4):479-85. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Frederick M. Specific Movement Agility Testing System. Movement. Health exercise conference. 2014. [Link]
- de França Bahia Loureiro L Jr, Costa Dias MO, Cremasco FC, da Silva MG, de Freitas PB. Assessment of Specificity of the Badcamp Agility test for Badminton Players. J Hum Kinet. 2017;57(1):191-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Halouani J, Chtourou H, Gabbett T, Chaouachi A, Chamari K. Small-sided games in team sports training: a brief review. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(12):3594-618. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sarmento H, Clemente FM, Harper LD, Costa IT da, Owen A, Figueiredo AJ. Small sided games in soccer-a systematic review. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2018;18(5):693-749. [Crossref]
- Young W, Rogers N. Effects of small-sided game and change-of-direction training on reactive agility and change-of-direction speed. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(4):307-14. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cabello Manrique D, González-Badillo JJ. Analysis of the characteristics of competitive badminton. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(1):62-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Majumdar P, Khanna GL, Malik V, Sachdeva S, Arif M, Mandal M. Physiological analysis to quantify training load in badminton. Br J Sports Med. 1997;31(4):342-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: Process List