Amaç: Bu çalışmada, adölesan sporcuların çok boyutlu kaygı düzeylerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla geliştirilen Spor Kaygı Ölçeği-2 [Sport Anxiety Scale-2 (SAS-2)]'nin yapı geçerliğinin, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile test edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Araştırmaya, 91 kız ve 97 erkek olmak üzere 10 farklı spor branşından toplam 188 (Xyaş=13,3; SS=2,7) adölesan sporcu katılmıştır. On beş madde, 4'lü Likert tipi değerlendirmeye sahip olan SAS-2; her biri 5 maddeden oluşan somatik kaygı, endişe ve konsantrasyon bozukluğu alt boyutlarından oluşmaktadır. Sporculara, SAS-2 ile birlikte 'kişisel bilgi formu', 'Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri', 'Sporcu Tükenmişlik Ölçeği' ve 'Adölesanlar İçin Fiziksel Benlik Algısı Envanteri-Çok Kısa Form' uygulanmıştır. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliği için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi; eş zaman ve yakınsak-ıraksak geçerlik için Pearson çarpım momentler korelasyon analizi; yakınsak ve ıraksak geçerlikleri ayrıca test etmek için ortalama açıklanan varyans [average variance extracted (AVE)], maksimum paylaşılan varyansın karesi [maximum shared squared variance (MSV)] ve paylaşılan varyansın karesinin ortalaması [average shared squared variance (ASV)], bileşik güvenirlik [composite reliability (CR)] değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Ölçeğin güvenirliğini sınamak için Cronbach alfa iç tutarlılık ve CR katsayıları hesaplanmıştır. Bulgular: Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre ölçekte yer alan maddelerin faktör yükleri ,71-,90 aralığında değişmekte ve modelin iyi uyum indeks değerlerine sahip olduğu (χ2 /sd=1,57; RMSEA=0,06; IFI=0,98; GFI=0,91; CFI=0,98; TLI=0,97) görülmektedir. Bunun yanı sıra SAS-2 ile Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri, Sporcu Tükenmişlik Ölçeği, Adölesanlar İçin Fiziksel Benlik Envanteri-Çok Kısa Form arasındaki korelasyonlar, envanterin eş zaman ve yakınsak-ıraksak geçerliğini desteklemektedir. Ayrıca hesaplanan MSV, ASV ve AVE değerleri, ölçeğin yakınsak ve ıraksak geçerliğini; Cronbach alfa ve CR katsayıları ise envanterin güvenirliğini desteklemektedir. Sonuç: Elde edilen bulgular, SAS-2'nin adölesan sporcularda çok boyutlu kaygının değerlendirilmesi için geçerlik ve güvenirlik koşullarını sağladığını ortaya koymaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Spor kaygı ölçeği; çok boyutlu kaygı; adölesan sporcular; doğrulayıcı faktör analizi; güvenirlik ve geçerlik
Objective: The purpose of this study was to test the construct validity of the Sport Anxiety Scale-2 (SAS-2) for measuring multidimensional anxiety levels of adolescent athletes with confirmatory factor analysis. Material and Methods: 188 (Mage=13.3; SD=2.7) adolescent athletes in total including 91 girls and 97 boys from 10 different sports branches participated in the study. SAS-2 has 15 items and 4 Likert type evaluations; it consists of somatic anxiety, worry and concentration disruption subscales. The athletes have been applied the with SAS-2 'personal information form'; 'Trait Anxiety Inventory'; 'Athlete Burnout Questionnaire'; 'Very Short form of the Physical Self-Inventory for Adolescents'. The confirmatory factor Analysis was used for the construct validity of the scale and Pearson Correlation Analysis was used for concurrent, convergent-divergent validity and average variance extracted (AVE), maximum shared squared variance (MSV), average shared squared variance (ASV) and composite reliability (CR) values were used in order to separately test the convergent and divergent validity. Cronbach alpha internal consistency and CR coefficients were used in order to test the reliability. Results: The factor loads of the items included in the scale ranges between .71 and .90 according to the results of confirmatory factor analysis and it is seen that the model has good compliance index values (χ2 /df=1.57, RMSEA=0.06, IFI=0.98, GFI=0.91, CFI=0.98, TLI=0.97). Correlations between the scales of SAS-2 and Trait Anxiety Inventory, Athlete Burnout Questionnaire, Very Short form of the Physical Self-Inventory for Adolescents supported concurrent, divergent-convergent validity of the inventory. In addition, calculated MSV, ASV and AVE values are the convergent and divergent validity of the scale; Cronbach's alpha and CR coefficients supported reliability of the inventory. Conclusion: The findings obtained reveal that the SAS-2 ensure the validity and reliability conditions for evaluation of multidimensional anxiety in adolescent athletes.
Keywords: Sport anxiety measurement; multidimensional anxiety; adolescent athletes; confirmatory factor analyses; reliability and validity
- Weinberg RS, Gould D. Arousal, stress, and anxiety. Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2018. p.77-101.
- Tsopani D, Dallas G, Skordilis EK. Competitive state anxiety and performance in young female rhythmic gymnasts. Percept Mot Skills. 2011;112(2):549-60.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Morris RL, Kavussanu M. The role of approach-avoidance versus task and ego goals in enjoyment and cognitive anxiety in youth sport. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009;7(2):185-202.[Crossref]
- Schaefer J, Vella SA, Allen MS, Magee CA. Competition anxiety, motivation, and mental toughness in golf. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2016;28(3):309-20.[Crossref]
- Cremades JG, Wated G, Wiggins MS. Multiplicative measurements of a trait anxiety scale as predictors of burnout. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2011;15(3):220-33.[Crossref]
- Hamidi S, Besharat MA. Perfectionism and competitive anxiety in athletes. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2010;5:813-7.[Crossref]
- Carbonneau N, Vallerand RJ, Massicotte S. Is the practice of yoga associated with positive outcomes? The role of passion. J Posit Psychol. 2010;5(6):452-65.[Crossref]
- Cagle JA, Overcash KB, Rowe DP, Needle AR. Trait anxiety as a risk factor for musculoskeletal injury in athletes: a critically appraised topic. Int J Athl Ther Train. 2017;22(3):26-31.[Crossref]
- Gould D, Greenleaf C, Krane V. Arousal-anxiety and sport behavior. In: Horn TS, ed. Advances in Sport Psychology. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 2002. p.207-36.
- Smith RE, Smoll FL, Cumming SP, Grossbard JR. Measurement of multidimensional sport performance anxiety in children and adults: The Sport Anxiety Scale-2. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2006;28(4):479-501.[Crossref]
- Tenenbaum G, Eklund RC, Kamata A. Introduction to measurement in sport and exercise psychology. Measurement in Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1st ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2011.p. 3-7 https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=lu96DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Measurement+in+sport+and+exercise+psychology&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9ye3P-MXsAhXKQEEAHeYbDbkQ6AEwAHoECAUQAg#v=onepage&q&f=false
- Martin JJ, Gill DL. The relationships among competitive orientation, sport-confidence, self-efficacy, anxiety, and performance. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1991;13(2):149-59.[Crossref]
- Smith RE, Smoll FL, Schutz RW. Measurement and correlates of sport-specific cognitive and somatic trait anxiety: the sport anxiety scale. Anxiety Research. 1990;2(4):263-80.[Crossref]
- Martens R, Vealey RS, Burton D,Bump LA, Smith DE. Development and validation of the competitive state anxiety inventory-2. In: Martens R, Vealey RS, Burton D, eds. Competitive Anxiety in Sport. 1st ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1990. p.117-90.
- Verner-Filion J, Vallerand RJ, Donahue EG, Moreau E, Martin A, Mageau GA. Passion, coping and anxiety in sport: the interplay between key motivational and self-regulatory processes. Int J Sport Psychol. 2014;45(6):516-37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274735847_Passion_coping_and_anxiety_in_sport_The_interplay_between_key_motivational_and_self-regulatory_processes
- Grossbard JR, Smith RE, Smoll FL, Cumming SP. Competitive anxiety in young athletes: differentiating somatic anxiety, worry, and concentration disruption. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2009;22(2):153-66.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ramis Y, Torregrosa M, Viladrich C, Cruz J. [Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Sport Anxiety Scale SAS- 2 for young athletes]. Psicothema. 2010;22(4):1004-9.[PubMed]
- Jannes CR, De Pelsemaeker D, De Deken D, Van Damme D. Psychometric properties of the Flemish version of the Sport Anxiety Scale-2. 13th FEPSAC European Congress of Sport Psychology. 12-17 July 2011; Madeira. https://www.fepsac.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/ProceedingsBook_Madeira.pdf
- Sousa C, Gomes M, Torregrosa M, Viladrich C, Cruz J. Psychometric properties of the MCSYS, AGSYS and SAS-2: preliminary validation into Portuguese. 13th FEPSAC European Congress of Sport Psychology. 12-17 July 2011; Madeira. https://www.fepsac.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/ProceedingsBook_Madeira.pdf
- Karadağ D, Aşçı FH. The reliability and validity of the Sport Anxiety Scale-2 for adolescent athletes. 3rd International Exercise and Sport Psychology Congress Proceedings Book. 23-25 October, 2015. İstanbul, Turkey. p.54. http://dosya.marmara.edu.tr/etkinlik/sportspsyc2015/Congress_Proceedings.pdf
- Akyol A, Altıntaş A, Sezer G, Aşçı FH. The construct validity and reliability of "Sport Anxiety Scale-2": confirmatory factor analysis. 14th International Sport Sciences Congress Book of Abstracts. 1-4 November, 2016. Antalya, Turkey. p.616. http://www.sporbilim.com/UserFiles/File/14%20SPOR%20Bilim%20kongre%20book.pdf
- Akyol A, Sezer G, Aşçı FH. Measuring multidimensional sport performance anxiety in Turkish athletes: the reliability and validity of the Sport Anxiety Scale-2. 3rd International Exercise and Sport Psychology Congress Proceedings Book. 23-25 October, 2015. İstanbul, Turkey. p.53. http://dosya.marmara.edu.tr/etkinlik/sportspsyc2015/Congress_Proceedings.pdf
- Cho S, Choi H, Eklund RC, Paek I. Validation and reliability of the Korean version of the Sport Anxiety Scale-2. J Hum Kinet. 2018;61:217-25.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Silva-Rocha VV, de Sousa DA, Osório FL. Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Sport Anxiety Scale-2. Front Psychol. 2019;10:806.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Erkuş A. [Problems encountered in scale development and adaptation studies]. Türk Psikoloji Bülteni. 2007;13(40):17-25. https://www.psikolog.org.tr/tr/yayinlar/dergiler/1031828/tpb134004.pdf
- Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; 2014. p.816.
- Raedeke TD, Smith AL. Development and preliminary validation of an athlete burnout measure. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2001;23(4):281-306.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kocadağ NH, Altıntaş A, Aşçı FH. The validity and reliability of athlete burnout questionnaire in adolescents athlete. 15th International Sport Sciences Congress Book of Abstracts. 15-18 November, 2017. Antalya, Turkey. p. 1493-1494. http://www.sporbilim.com/UserFiles/File/SBK2017.pdf
- Maïano C, Morin AJS, Ninot G, Monthuy-Blanc J, Stephan Y, Florent JF, Vallée P. A short and very short form of the physical self-inventory for adolescents: development and factor validity. Psychol Sport Exerc.2008;9(6):830-47.[Crossref]
- Aşçi FH, Maïano C, Morin AJS, Çağlar E, Bilgili N. Validity and reliability of the very short form of the physical self-inventory among Turkish adolescents. J Sports Sci. 2017;35(21):2060-6.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Öner N, Le Compte A. Durumluk Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri El Kitabı. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları No. 333. 1. Baskı. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları; 1983. p.26.
- Özusta HŞ. [Turkish standardization, reliability and validity of state trait anxiety ınventory for children]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. 1995;10(34);32-44. https://toad.halileksi.net/sites/default/files/pdf/cocuklar-icin-durumluk-surekli-kaygi-envanteri-toad.pdf
- Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. MPR-Online. 2003;8(2):23-74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251060246_Evaluating_the_Fit_of_Structural_Equation_Models_Tests_of_Significance_and_Descriptive_Goodness-of-Fit_Measures
- Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238-46.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidisciplinary J. 1999;6(1):1-55.[Crossref]
- Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı: İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum. 24. Baskı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi; 2018. p.214.[Crossref]
- de Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, de Brito Guirardello E. [Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity]. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017;26(3):649-59.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gomes AR, Faria S, Vilela C. Anxiety and burnout in young athletes: the mediating role of cognitive appraisal. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27(12):2116-26.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gliner JA, Morgan GA, Leech NL. Research Methods in Applied Settings: An Integrated Approach to Design and Analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge; 2017. p.598.
- Dale LP, Vanderloo L, Moore S, Faulkner G. Physical activity and depression, anxiety, and self-esteem in children and youth: an umbrella systematic review. Ment Health Phys Act. 2019;16:66-79.[Crossref]
- Coudevylle GR, Gernigon C, Ginis KAM. Self-esteem, self-confidence, anxiety and claimed self-handicapping: a mediational analysis. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2011;12(6):670-5.[Crossref]
- Hair Jr JF, Matthews LM, Matthews RL, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int J Multivar Data Anal. 2017;1(2):107-23.[Crossref]
- Alpar R. Spor Bilimlerinde Uygulamalı İstatistik. Nobel Yayın No. 221. 2. Baskı. İstanbul: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım; 2001. p.310.
.: Process List