Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the intraoperative parameters, postoperative pain, surgical parameters, complication rates, and stone-free rates in patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) under spinal anaesthesia (SA) versus general anaesthesia (GA). Material and Methods: A total of 100 patients treated with RIRS under SA (50) and GA (50) for renal stones were compared prospectively. The operative and postoperative outcomes of both groups were then analysed prospectively. Results: The demographic data was comparable between the two groups in terms of patient age, gender, and American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) score as well as the size, lateralization, and location of the stones. And also, the mean operative times, fluoroscopy times, hospitalization times, and stone free rates were similar between the two groups. Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores-measured only two hours after surgery-and rescue analgesia need were found statistically significantly lower in the SA group when compared with the GA group. Minor complication (Clavien 1-3) rates were 18% and 12% for the SA and GA group, respectively (p > 0.05). Conclusion: RIRS with SA can be performed safely and effectively to manage kidney stones, producing the same stone free rate (SFR) and complication rates when compared to GA.
Keywords: Anesthesia, spinal; kidney calculi; ureteroscopy
Amaç: Bu çalışmada, spinal anestezi (SA) ve genel anestezi (GA) altında RIRS uygulanan hastalarda intraoperatif parametreleri, postoperatif ağrı skorlarını, cerrahi parametreleri, komplikasyon oranlarını ve taşsızlık oranlarını karşılaştırmak amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Böbrek taşı olan toplam 100 hasta SA (50) ve GA (50) altında RIRS uygulandı ve her iki grup prospektif olarak karşılaştırıldı. Her iki grubun per-operatif ve postoperatif sonuçları prospektif olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Her iki grup demografik veriler açısından karşılaştırıldığında yaş, cinsiyet, boyut, taraf, taş yerleşimi ve hastaların ASA skorları açısından benzerdi. Ayrıca ortalama ameliyat süreleri, floroskopi süreleri, hastanede yatış süreleri ve taşsızlık oranları iki grup arasında benzerdi. Post op 2. saatteki VAS skorları ve kurtarma analjezi gereksinimi SA grubunda GA grubuna göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede düşük bulundu. Minör komplikasyon (Klavien 1-3) oranları SA ve GA grubu için sırasıyla%18 ve %12 idi (P> 0.05). Sonuç: SA ile yapılan RIRS, GA ile karşılaştırıldığında aynı taşsızlık ve komplikasyon oranlarına sahip olup, böbrek taşı tedavisinde güvenli ve etkili bir yöntemdir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Anestezi, spinal; böbrek taşları; üreteroskopi
- Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):475-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Geraghty R, Abourmarzouk O, Rai B, Biyani CS, Rukin NJ, Somani BK. Evidence for Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Fragmentation (URSL) for large renal stones in the modern era. Curr Urol Rep. 2015;16(8):54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wiesenthal JD, Ghiculete D, D'A Honey RJ, Pace KT. A comparison of treatment modalities for renal calculi between 100 and 300 mm2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy equivalent? J Endourol. 2011;25(3):481-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sari S, Ozok HU, Cakici MC, Ozdemir H, Bas O, Karakoyunlu N, et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of renal stones? >2 CM. Urol J. 2017;14(1):2949-54.
- Kamal M, Sharma P, Singariya G, Jain R. Feasibility and complications of spinal anaesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: our experience. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(6):UC08-UC11. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Zheng C, Yang H, Luo J, Xiong B, Wang H, Jiang Q. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment for renal stones 1-2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(6):549-56. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V, Laopaiboon M. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(4):CD007044. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kumar A, Kumar N, Vasudeva P, Kumar Jha S, Kumar R, Singh H. A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience. J Urol. 2015;193(1):160-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Shi X, Peng Y, Li X, Wang Q, Li L, Liu M, et al. Propensity score-matched analysis comparing retrograde intrarenal surgery with percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large stones in patients with a solitary kidney. J Endourol. 2018;32(3):198-204. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Warner MA, Shields SE, Chute CG. Major morbidity and mortality within 1 month of ambulatory surgery and anesthesia. JAMA. 1993;270(12):1437-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000;321(7275):1493. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Schulz-Stübner S. The critically ill patient and regional anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;19(5):538-44. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Caskurlu T, Atis G, Arikan O, Pelit ES, Kilic M, Gurbuz C. The impact of body mass index on the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery. Urology. 2013;81(3):517-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Resorlu B, Unsal A, Ziypak T, Diri A, Atis G, Guven S, et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones. World J Urol. 2013;31(6):1581-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zeng G, Zhao Z, Yang F, Zhong W, Wu W, Chen W. Retrograde intrarenal surgery with combined spinal-epidural vs general anesthesia: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Endourol. 2015;29(4):401-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Karabulut I, Koc E, Yilmaz AH, Ahiskali EO, Keskin E, Adanur S, et al. Could spinal anesthesia be a choice for retrograde intrarenal surgery. Urologia. 2018;85(4):169-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Oztekin U, Caniklioglu M, Selmi V, Kantekin CU, Atac F, Gurel A, et al. Do anesthesia methods in retrograde intrarenal surgery make difference regarding the success of ureteral access and surgical outcomes? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020;30(3):273-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Baran O, Aykac A, Sari S, Ates A, Ozok U, Sunay M. [Retrograde intrarenal surgery for stone disease under spinal anaesthesia, a minimally invasive technique. A retrospective analysis of 1,467 cases]. Actas Urol Esp. 2019;43(5):248-53. [Crossref]
- Kwon O, Lee JM, Park J, Cho MC, Son H, Jeong H, et al. Influence of anesthesia methods on surgical outcomes and renal function in retrograde intrarenalstone surgery: a prospective, randomized controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19(1):239. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: Process List