Amaç: Bu araştırmada, dil ve konuşma terapistlerinin (DKT), kekemeliği olan çocukların maruz kalabileceği akran zorbalığına yönelik algı ve uygulamalarının incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Araştırmaya, Türkiye'nin farklı şehirlerinde hizmet veren 104 DKT katılmıştır (yaş ortalaması=24, 77±2,2). Araştırmacılar tarafından ilgili alanyazın taranarak oluşturulan bir anket, veri toplama aracı olarak kullanılmıştır. Anketin ilk kısmı, 7 maddeden oluşmakta ve katılımcıların özelliklerini tanımlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Anketin 2. bölümü 16 maddedir. Bu bölüm, kısa hikâyeler ve bu hikâyelerdeki durumu değerlendirmeye yönelik maddelerden oluşmaktadır. Anket içerisinde kullanılan kısa hikâyeler, daha önce Blood ve ark. tarafından yürütülen çalışmada kullanılan kısa hikâyeler temel alınarak oluşturulmuştur. Bulgular: DKT'lerin anlatılan akran zorbalığı durumunu önemseme düzeyleri ve duruma ilişkin müdahale etme olasılıkları, akran zorbalığı ile ilgili ders alma, eğitim ya da seminere katılma ve okuma ya da araştırma yapma durumlarından etkilenmemektedir. Ayrıca çalışmaya katılan DKT'ler, belirli bir zorbalık türünü diğerlerine kıyasla daha önemli ya da daha çok müdahale edilmesi gereken bir durum olarak algılamamaktadırlar. 'Danışan ile duyarsızlaşma çalışmaları yapma' (%26,9), 'Çocuk ile psikolojik dayanıklılık, problem çözme ve baş etme stratejileri üzerine çalışma' (%13,5) ve 'Aile, öğretmen bilgilendirmesi ile birlikte çocuk ile de çalışma' (%11,5) yanıtları ise DKT'lerin, akran zorbalığına maruz kalan kekeleyen danışanlarına yönelik en sık belirttikleri uygulamalar olmuştur. Sonuç: DKT'lerin, kekemeliği olan çocuklara yönelik akran zorbalığı müdahalesi konusunda klinik uygulamalarını zenginleştirmeleri önerilmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Akran zorbalığı; akran zorbalığı müdahalesi; kekemelik; okul çağı kekemelik
Objective: It was aimed to examine the perceptions and practices of language and speech therapists (SLT) towards peer bullying that children with stuttering may be exposed to. Material and Methods: A total of 104 SLTs serving in different cities of Turkey participated in this research (average age=24, 77±2.2). A questionnaire prepared by the researchers by scanning the relevant literature was used as a data collection tool. The first part of the questionnaire consists of 7 demographic items. The second part of the questionnaire consists of 16 items. This section consists of short stories and items to evaluate the situation in these stories. The stories used in the questionnaire prepared by based on the stories that previously published by Blood et al. Results: The level of caring of the SLTs about the described bullying situation and their probability of intervening in the situation are not affected by taking a course, attending a training or seminar, reading or doing a research about the bullying. In addition, SLTs did not perceive a certain type of bullying as more important than others or as a situation that needs more intervention. 'Doing desensitization studies with the client' (26.9%), 'Working with the child on psychological resilience, problem solving and coping strategies' (13.5%) and 'Working with the child together with the family and the teacher' (11.5%) were most frequently stated practices of SLTs for their stuttering clients. Conclusion: It is recommended that SLTs enrich their clinical practice in the intervention of bullying for children with stuttering.
Keywords: Peer bullying; peer bullying intervention; stuttering; school-age stuttering
- Gürhan N. Her yönü ile akran zorbalığı [All aspects of the bullying]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Psychiatr Nurs-Special Topics. 2017;3(2):175-81. [Link]
- Olweus D. Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do. 1st ed. Malden: Blackwell Publishing; 1993.
- Berger KS. Update on bullying at school: science forgotten? Developmental Review. 2007; 27(1):90-126. [Crossref]
- Tapper K, Boulton MJ. Victim and peer group responses to different forms of aggression among primary school children. Aggressive Behavior. 2005;31(3):238-53. [Crossref]
- Xie H, Swift DJ, Cairns BD, Cairns RB. Aggressive behaviors in social interaction and developmental adaptation: a narrative analysis of interpersonal conflicts during early adolescence. Social Development. 2002;11(2): 205-24. [Crossref]
- Tokunaga RS. Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior. 2010;26(3):277-87. [Crossref]
- Smith PK. Bullying: definition, types, causes, consequences and intervention. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2016;10(9): 519-32. [Crossref]
- Hughes S. Bullying: what speech-language pathologists should know. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2014;45(1):3-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Guitar B. Stuttering: An Integrated Approach to Its Nature and Treatment. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. p.19-20.
- Langevin M, Packman A, Onslow M. Peer responses to stuttering in the preschool setting. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009;18(3):264-76. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Franck AL, Jackson RA, Pimentel JT, Greenwood GS. School-age children's perceptions of a person who stutters. J Fluency Disord. 2003;28(1):1-15. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Blood GW, Blood IM. Preliminary study of self-reported experience of physical aggression and bullying of boys who stutter: relation to increased anxiety. Percept Mot Skills. 2007;104(3 Pt 2):1060-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Blood GW, Blood IM, Tramontana GM, Sylvia AJ, Boyle MP, Motzko GR. Self-reported experience of bullying of students who stutter: relations with life satisfaction, life orientation, and self-esteem. Percept Mot Skills. 2011; 113(2):353-64. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Davis S, Howell P, Cooke F. Sociodynamic relationships between children who stutter and their non-stuttering classmates. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002;43(7):939-47. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Hugh-Jones S, Smith PK. Self-reports of short- and long-term effects of bullying on children who stammer. Br J Educ Psychol. 1999;69 ( Pt 2):141-58. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kara İ, Karamete A. Kekemeliği olan yetişkinlerin okul çağındaki akran zorbalığı mağduriyetlerinin belirlenmesi: ön çalışma [Determining the effects of victimization by peer-bullying during school-age on adults who stutter: a preliminary study]. Journal of Language, Speech and Swallowing Research. 2018;1(1):50-61. [Link]
- Blood GW, Blood IM. Long-term consequences of childhood bullying in adults who stutter: social anxiety, fear of negative evaluation, self-esteem, and satisfaction with life. J Fluency Disord. 2016;50:72-84. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Iverach L, O'Brian S, Jones M, Block S, Lincoln M, Harrison E, et al. Prevalence of anxiety disorders among adults seeking speech therapy for stuttering. J Anxiety Disord. 2009;23(7):928-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Menzies RG, Onslow M, Packman A, O'Brian S. Cognitive behavior therapy for adults who stutter: a tutorial for speech-language pathologists. J Fluency Disord. 2009;34(3):187-200. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Murphy WP, Quesal RW. Strategies for addressing bullying with the school-age child who stutters. Semin Speech Lang. 2002; 23(3):205-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kikuchi Y, Umezaki T, Sawatsubashi M, Taura M, Yamaguchi Y, Murakami D, et al. Experiences of teasing and bullying in children who stutter. International Archives of Communication Disorder. 2019;2(2):1-4. [Crossref]
- Murphy WP, Yaruss JS, Quesal RW. Enhancing treatment for school-age children who stutter II. Reducing bullying through role-playing and self-disclosure. J Fluency Disord. 2007; 32(2):139-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yaruss JS, Reeves N, Herring C. How speech-language pathologists can minimize bullying of children who stutter. Semin Speech Lang. 2018;39(4):342-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Erim A, Uysal Aydın A. İlkokul öğretmenlerinin kekemelik ve akran zorbalığına yönelik farkındalık düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Examining the awareness levels of primary school teachers towards stuttering and peer bullying]. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi. 2021;4(1):86-107. [Crossref]
- Plexico LW, Plumb AM, Beacham J. Teacher knowledge and perceptions of stuttering and bullying in school‐age children. Perspectives on Fluency and Fluency Disorders. 2013; 23(2):39-53. [Crossref]
- Mallick R, Kathard H, Borhan ASM, Pillay M, Thabane L. A cluster randomised trial of a classroom communication resource program to change peer attitudes towards children who stutter among grade 7 students. Trials. 2018;19:1-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Nicolai S, Geffner R, Stolberg R, Yaruss JS. Retrospective experiences of cyberbullying and emotional outcomes on young adults who stutter. J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2018;11(1): 27-37. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Sevinç B. Survey araştırması yöntemi. Böke K, editör. Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. 5. Baskı. Ankara: Alfa Yayıncılık; 2017. p.245-83.
- Barter C, Renold E. The use of vignettes in qualitative research. Social Research Update. 1999;25(9):1-6. [Link]
- Blood GW, Boyle MP, Blood IM, Nalesnik GR. Bullying in children who stutter: speech-language pathologists' perceptions and intervention strategies. J Fluency Disord. 2010;35(2): 92-109. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Demirci S, Köseli M. İkincil veri ve içerik analizi. Böke K, editör. Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. 5. Baskı. Ankara: Alfa Yayıncılık; 2017. p.105-47.
- Blood GW, Blood IM, Coniglio AD, Finke EH, Boyle MP. Familiarity breeds support: speech-language pathologists' perceptions of bullying of students with autism spectrum disorders. J Commun Disord. 2013;46(2):169-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Blood GW, Decker KL, Raviotti KA, Leibig AM, Blood IM. Bullying in schools: speech language pathologists' responses to specific bullying incidents. Commun Disord Deaf Stud Hearing Aids. 2014;2(4):1-8. [Link]
- Jacobsen KE, Bauman S. Bullying in schools: school counselors' responses to three types of bullying incidents. Professional School Counsel. 2007;11(1):1-9. [Link]
- Pernice-Duca F, Taiariol J, Yoon J. Perceptions of school and family climates and experiences of relational aggression. J School Violence. 2010;9(3):303-19. [Crossref]
.: İşlem Listesi